[quote user="Youthman"] Mine was used. No jumpers were included. Is Romex the correct thickness? I have some I could try. [/quote]I think some units had a back-panel switch connecting internal jumpers.

They have sweet little jumpsuits.

Audioquest makes, or used to make, a very handy very short little pair, which keeps the clutter way down. The sonic quality is very good, and, yes, quality can make a difference even as short as they are.

[quote user="Marvel"]I had a JVC that used jumpers between the pre and amp. They consisted of only the center pins, with no shield.[/quote]I believe those were widely used back then. The ones I saw were generic metal (I was told steel). The AQ's were a notable improvement in spite of the very short length, when I compared them.

[quote user="Youthman"]Larry, these are probably similar to what you are talking about. Several of them being sold on Ebay as well[/quote]Similar, except the ones I saw long ago really looked like steel, like big staples, and I know the Audioquests sounded better than those.

[quote user="wayfarer"] I live in townhouse and the only wall I could use is 11' wall I share with my neighbors which means woofers will be firing directly at them. Still may go for it. Have one full day to agonize over a decision.... [/quote]FWIW, my K's are in the corners of an 11' wall at one end of my living room. True, they don't couple well with the room, but that's what I have to work with, and I think they sound very good. There is adequate room between them

[quote user="Quiet_Hollow"]Sound-wise, I pit it up against reality, because that's what it sounds like with the right source material. [/quote] Good outcome! System synergy is so very hard to attain, sometimes takes several tries. I've heard more than a few spendy setups, some in stores, that don't have it.

Somewhere long ago, I saw two Klipsch mahogany designations -- M7 and M2. M7 was supposed to be dark, and M2 much lighter. Frzninvt on the forum probably knows.

[quote user="skonopa"]I've been hearing a lot of good things about that PureMusic. Since I got a new MacBook Pro earlier this spring, I still have my old one, and it works perfectly fine. I think I may "repurpose" it as a music server and try out this PureMusic. Granted, at $129, it is not exactly "cheap", but not to terribly expensive either.[/quote]I forgot to mention I also have PureMusic on my MacBook Pro, which is probably partly responsible for the fine sound

[quote user="CECAA850"]I've read a lot of positive reviews on the DRAGONFLY DAC .[/quote]Yeah, it really caught on in a hurry with reviewers, so I got one for my MacBook Pro. I used that combo with Pro-media 2.1's to play some of a Monteverdi Vespers DVD (recorded in the San Marco basilica) to a group of 150-200 in a large meeting room. It sounded gorgeous! The Dragonfly simply fits right in without taking up additional space, and that's very nice. I didn't do a Dragonfly