Jump to content

Alerts!

Want to alert forum members to sales you are not affiliated with on eBay, Craigslist, etc? Post in here.


9154 topics in this forum

    • 22 replies
    • 1.9k views
  1. La Scala

    • 1 reply
    • 580 views
    • 7 replies
    • 671 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.2k views
  2. KLF20

    • 0 replies
    • 442 views
  3. Belles

    • 0 replies
    • 442 views
    • 2 replies
    • 694 views
    • 8 replies
    • 920 views
  4. Klipsch Horn Tweeters

    • 0 replies
    • 397 views
    • 24 replies
    • 41k views
  5. Klipsch HIP in DFW - $750

    • 0 replies
    • 488 views
  6. Kaylyps Speakers ?

    • 5 replies
    • 892 views
    • 6 replies
    • 881 views
    • 0 replies
    • 499 views
    • 3 replies
    • 449 views
  7. Khorns in Hemet, CA

    • 12 replies
    • 520 views
  8. CL: LaScalas (Tampa)

    • 0 replies
    • 324 views
  9. Belles in DFW - $3,000

    • 2 replies
    • 723 views
    • 3 replies
    • 731 views
    • 2 replies
    • 372 views
    • 1 reply
    • 370 views
    • 2 replies
    • 579 views
    • 1 reply
    • 288 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.1k views
  10. CL: KLF-30 (Miami)

    • 2 replies
    • 441 views
  • Recent Posts

    • I had the predecessor of that one for a little while. The ATLP-5. It would not allow me to hook it up to a preamp like it stated it would. Maybe the newer model corrects that.   Not that particular cart, but it's a Microline and that is great! They operate with less weight because it fits the record groove better, don't wear out the LP like some rounded types actually do. I've preferred that brand for decades because of the clear separation of the high end, the clean bass and all around tonal qualities of Audio Technica. & I loved the chunky look of the ATLP-5!
    • Yessiree! It "keeps the sound" in!!
    • usps is baaaaad, m'kay? They mark stuff as delivered when it is not delivered! Like yesterday here! And a dozen times before.   They forged my signature once a couple years ago when I was in the ghettos of a sc swamp! That forgery was listed as an alias when I closed on my home!! I don't have aliases.    Not only baaaad but criminal. No, they're exempt but I did get my $300 back.   "There's no Place Like Home!" huh Dave? Updraft before the storm can be pretty bad, then you know what's coming! Glad you only got rocked and not rolled!  
    • I think you've got a good handle on it. Speakers that are easy to drive and present a benign load don't usually benefit from more watts. Now when I say "easy to drive", I don't mean speakers with less than 95 db sensitivity. I mean speakers like the Heritage series and comparable ones.    I still maintain what you are hearing is that you prefer the sound of the more powerful amp, and not because it's more powerful. Because it just sounds better. This may be for several reasons.   1) You like the sound of tubes over transistors   2) The Fisher has better parts and a better circuit design   3) The Fisher has a more robust power supply   Or some combination of all of the above. But I don't think output power is what you are hearing.    
    • Lot's of interesting comments and information here, but it isn't answering the question that is bugging me. I'll ask a different way...   It supposedly takes 1 watt of power from the amplifier to drive my Forte IIIs to an SPL of 98 dB at one meter on axis. A 8 wpc ACA has more than enough power to do that and a 28 wpc Fisher is not going to require more than that same 1 watt to achieve the same SPL. Someone please correct me if this is not true, but it seems to be a law of physics.   If this is correct, the question is, what is(are) the benefit(s) of the additional output power of higher output amp?   I'm not asking with the ulterior motive of suggesting no benefits exist. In fact, in my response to 82 Cornwalls above, I'm saying I can hear differences that I think of as beneficial...things I don't hear from the ACA at the same SPL. My desire is to understand why. Obviously, it is not all about SPL. Maybe the differences boil down to topology and the output power potential has nothing to do with it, but posts from others supporting the use of higher output amps suggests that is not the case.   I'm still curious.
    • Increases in gain don't equate to more power. This just means that the amp can be driven to clipping sooner or later depending on the output voltage of the source. Amps that are designed as a push/pull amp usually don't sound as good when switched to triode. Most manufacturers will agree. This just gives the owner more flexibility. Then again, as in most things audio, this is subjective. You may like a pentode amp better when switched into triode. My take is different.
    • I'm working on a trade deal... my speakers and cash.   At minimum I am looking at replacing the crossovers, a total cleaning, possibly new tweeter diaphragms and maybe new woofers (depending on their condition).   This looks like more of a project than I was led to believe... At this point I'm trying to decide what they are worth given their condition.   
    • Unfortunately, no difference because my caps were intact and looked good.
    • @mikebse2a3, thank you very much for doing that.  I did note the low contrast but did not have time to fix the old photo I had on my hard drive.  Regards.
    • Yes, the gain in switching produces more output from the amp and first perceptions are the the increases in volume/gain may be       laperceived as better but, longer listening ends with fatigue due to the Hi's im many cases.  Ultralinear delivers more power and promises no more. Tubes that are meant for pentode or beam triode will  work well in most systems.  All the ultralinear amp that I read and know about have more power in ultrilinear mode. The power tube is used entirely different than in tirode mode. The KT 88 pair can produce nearly 100 watts even pushing low ohm speakers..
×
×
  • Create New...