Jump to content

Schu

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    15340
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Schu

  1. that's a pretty short HF section... they are nearly physically aligned. I wonder if you couldn't just get away with two channels of amplification... I should have kept my 691's...
  2. Senior Coconuts Kraftwerk Tribute!
  3. Photos would be nice... interested in the Martinellis.
  4. I would like to see a miniaturized version LF doghouse added to a stand mounted Heresy with a 10"/12" driver... but that's not gonna happen. Probably not enough volume...
  5. Is that phase coherent diffusion on the front wall or some homemade curved panels?
  6. if you dont have dogs, like me, I suggest moving them on axis directly in front of the front beauty panel... You won't get 'smearing' by having them off axis like I do, but there is some small alignment mismatch... though it's fairly insignificant.
  7. Schu

    What I Got Today!

    more Art...
  8. Not only no... HELL no. works, of course... desired, not if quality is your goal. your mileage may vary
  9. I would use a multi-channel or 5.1/5.2 set up with multi channel processing for immersive sound. or you can just use 2-channel... with a hornloaded subwoofer
  10. not if you try and use your think meat and look at it in terms of class of product... direct radiating versus horn-loaded. don't you feel inadequate now?
  11. Ambient can be very cool... if it's 'processed' correctly. I enjoy ambient sound distribution... but not more than Stereo or 5.1
  12. without entering into a circular logic semantic debate, like I said... it's a Band-Aid. I think a lot of the issues for many can stem from implementation as opposed to the outright disdain of direct radiation... that being said, DR's are more alike than they are different from each other. One is just about as good as another.
  13. Not only yes... Hell yes. Once you learn what to/how to listen... Intermodulation distortion with its time variable is fairly distinct to a signal that is more linear.
  14. you should post photos of the condition of the cane...
  15. this is... ONCE AGAIN... an issue of Economics and not one of scientific relevance. If anyone wants to spend 500$ on a machined billet aluminum bracket when a 10$ stamped steel bracket can do the same work, why should we not be allowed to use Billet aluminum? Common mass mentality is that you've wasted 490$ when if fact you merely made a decision based on economics. if you want beautiful stranded and woven cables, by all means use them. in as far as 'expectation' bias... I have a different view point. if I am choosing to use something that costs me inordinately more to use, my 'Bias' is not one of justification, but one of criticality... In other words, I am actually going to be MORE CRITICAL of that item, not less critical.
  16. It STANDS TO REASON that if a poor wire/cable can make something sound worse, that a good/decent/reliable cable can make something sound better... both things MUST BE a truism in order for one of them to be the truth.
  17. this make me giggle out loud... for someone that can supposedly hear 1" MDF resonance.
  18. that would happen if you added a rounded flared that ends of that wall?
×
×
  • Create New...