Jump to content

Travis In Austin

Moderators
  • Posts

    12518
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by Travis In Austin

  1. D, How are things at All Souls? What have you read lately you can recommend? Travis
  2. Cool, it is on Kindle, I will pick it up. Thanks for the tip Larry. Travis
  3. I first learned of the bastardization of records in 1975 when I was reading "Recording Engineer Magazine." It was obvious even then, that the engineers and the audiophiles were on different paths. But what I read then is mild compared to what Milner writes about in the book with today's methods. I wonder if buyers of today's pop music know that most singers can't hold a tune and need Auto-Tune to create a vocal track? Or that groups can no longer sing harmony? Or that most of the drums you hear are sampled? The entire production is a synthetic confection made on computers (Pro Tools) and once all the life has been sucked out, there is just nothing but spectacular noise remaining. A quote from Bruce Botnik: Sound since the 1960s has gone backwards instead of forwards, in my estimation. In the recordings that I do today for motion pictures, I use tube microphones, tube microphone pre-amps, and I try to bypass the solid-state consoles as much as possible. It's more open, it's rounder, it has more depth. I can give you an example. If you take a room that has some reverberation not a chamber, just good clear liveness and you put an earphone in the middle of the room with a click going through it, so you hear the “tick, tick, tick.” Plug up a good microphone, maybe a (Neumann) U-67 or something like that, split the signal so it goes into a tube microphone pre-amp, and then the solid-state pre-amp, bring them both up on the console, and switch back and forth, and listen. With the tube, you'll hear all the reverberation in the room; the solid-state will close down. Ten times out of 10. So that's somewhat what you're hearing. Even the equalizers back then were tube; we had Pultech EQ-P1A's.
  4. I don't think, as an American, I could agree to pay restitution to the descendants of slaves anymore than I could expect to receive a check from England for the abuses of King George to my ancestors. Me neither. One of the troubles with this is that no one is guilty. You can't find a guilty person anywhere in the country. Not in business, not in politics, not in the population. Everyone's innocent! Indeed, this is the way perception works. We have no sense of "class guilt" that anyone is willing to accept. And yet, we do have the crime. No one is going to wear Nixon's guilt, for instance. The source for any form of restitution has to be from the Federal Reserve. If they can use $3T to bail out bankers, both foreign and domestic, we can also use $3T to bail out the injured parties of the historical racism. I can't say it is cash payments, or land, or infrastructure, or what it really looks like. But, it can't be ZERO simply because no person will accept guilt. And, I am not speaking as the injured party, I am only speaking as the observer. You can't have massive crime and no restitution, and expect a good result. As we speak, and as I am trying to explain the existing racism, there are political activists all over the South (primarily) trying to dream up new clever ways to disenfranchise blacks. So, we can't even begin to find solutions when so many people are still creating new problems. As we speak, 1200 AM radio stations across the nation are blurting out a non-stop propaganda campaign designed to denigrate blacks and lift whites to new levels of Guilt Free Virtue. As we speak, cops all over the country are looking for more opportunities today, right now, to harass blacks, deny their rights, embarrass them with their families, beat them, and if needed, shoot them. As we speak, businessmen all over the country are dreaming new schemes to lower their wages, prey on their lack of financial sophistication, and further reduce their wealth in ways they wouldn't apply to whites. So, really, any kind of restitution talk is just hot air. We haven't ended the racism yet. Do you assign no blame to the black community for their current plight? Is it all the white conservatives fault? I doubt this country will outgrow its racial bias within the next 50 years on its own and it is near impossible to legislate the issue. Because you can't legislate how someone should feel about someone else. When crimes are committed, why should the victims take any blame? I don't think I have put all the blame on "white conservatives." I have said they are responsible for the propaganda, but the blame for the 500 years of exploitation belongs to the ruling class. And that class has only mild interest retail politics, their interest is money, property and wealth. They plot the strategies of economic oppression, racism and the like. They are not "conservatives" or "liberals" as such, just the establishment owners and decision makers. The barriers you speak of, I believe, do exist, in the form of institutional and environmental racism. Below, at the bottom, I have quoted an excerpt of an article on institutional racism by a professor at the University of Indiana School of Education, the full article can be found here: http://diverseeducation.com/article/64583/ She indicates the research confirms what Mark indicated about hiring practices. She asks questions in a way that most people don't think about. The reason we don't think about them, according to her, and many others, is because of institutional racism, whether intentional or not. We just don't pay attention to it because we are in the minority, at least I think that is the reason why. But in looking at the questions she poses, and answering them honestly, it does highlight some areas of concern where maybe none was in our mindset's before. She is careful to say it "may" be in indication of institutional racism, not that it exists. Redistricting is one form of institutional racism, it has occurred recently, and continues to occur. The Supreme Court found that Texas had violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in and they were forced to redraw the lines. A portion of that Act was invalidated last year and the Voting Rights Act is in a state of flux. The Court continues to rule on a 5-4 idealogical split. That everything is equal and hunky dory in the United States, even on an issue as fundamental as voting, simply isn't the case, it is pure fantasy. There is a racial divide, disconnect, or whatever you want to call it. Here is a FACT that everyone is going to have to come to grips with, liberal, conservative, Democrat or Republican. Whites will become the minority of the population during the lifetime of most everyone here (estimates range from 2040 to 2044). In Texas whites are already the minority, 45%. It is effectively a Tea Party state currently (fact, not a political comment), however, at least one Hispanic congressional district was created after the last census, and by 2020 they are predicting major and fundamental shifts. The other states where whites are in currently in the minority are California, New Mexico, and Hawaii. States where the white population has fallen below 60% are Maryland, Georgia, Florida, Nevada, Arizona, New York, New Jersey, Mississippi and Louisiana. Minority children are now the majority in the following ten states: California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Mississippi, and Maryland. FACT: Minority children will be the MAJORITY in the ENTIRE US by 2019. My solution to the "problem," what ever that may be, is to invest in our children, of whatever color, religion, or economic background. Your children, and most certainly your grandchildren, will be governed by by the majority (which will be non-white). If it means cutting defense, cutting social security, cutting the pensions of senators and congress, raising taxes on estates, individuals and corporations I don't care what it is. WIth two wars to pay for it is going to be extremely difficult, but it can be done if it is a priority. If today's minorities perceive there is discrimination, racism, or injustice, it better get dealt with now because what "goes around, comes around." There is a solution to all of this and that is simply to just deal with, NOW, instead of saying it doesn't exist, or it was caused by prior generation(s), or ignoring it. Global warming may, or may not, happen, but the eventual transition of whites out of the majority, and eventually out of political control, will happen. It is matter of simple demographics. "They" will also ultimately control on the issues of immigration, citizenship requirements, pathway to citizenship, whether there is a free and open border to the North and South. The "we" and "them" and "those" can either start to evaporate now with a shift to WE are all in it together as "US." Or not, and eventually instead of being on the outside like "them" today, your children and your grandchildren will be on the outside. "We The People" BEGIN QUOTE Interestingly, there is a large body of research that clearly suggests that folks tend to hire and rehire folks who tend to act and look exactly themselves. So, exactly what do those organizations mean when they report embracing, celebrating and hiring a racially diverse pool of applicants? Given the statistics about who is typically hired at most organizations — let’s say Fortune 500 companies — I would say that it does not mean much, other than those organizations might just have a structural racism problem, given their hiring practices. How are the roots of structural and institutionalized racism formed? It’s subtle. It seems normal. It seems innocent. That is the way that institutionalized racism works; it is rooted in the core of one’s everyday existence yet it is easy to detect if we just look and assess. If you live in the United States and you have never been around anyone or very few people of color, you may just be a part of a structurally racist system. [You might also claim that some of your best friends are, but if you have to count, then there is still a problem] When buildings are erected in the name of someone and the someone is never a person of color, then you might be sending messages to everyone about folks who are powerful, smart and valued. That is how institutionalized racism works. When pictures of presidents, board members, award-winning whomevers are hung, and they do not depict a demography that matches that of the state, city or the country, then your organization might have an institutional racism problem. Look at the organizational structure to which you belong. If the organization is disproportionately White in all upper levels positions, and all of the folks in lower level positions are folks of color, then your organization may have an institutionalized racism problem. Take a look at the hires in your own department. If it is all White, then you may just have an institutional racism problem. In addition, if the department has hired one person of color, and claims or believes that diversity goals have been met, you still have a problem. When you and the administration can name the one or two folks of color who are routinely asked to reside on every committee in your organization, then you might have an institutionalized racism problem. [bTW, folks of color can name the one or two “usual suspects” in their organization.] If those same folks who serve are always the same ones — the “usual suspects” — you might ask why? Often times, the “usual suspects” are chosen to serve because there are few folks of color in the organization, yet sometimes, the “usual suspects” are chosen because administrators are most comfortable with some people of color. Everyone has a unique biography, consciousness and reaction to oppression. In fact, those “biographies,” one’s consciousness, and or dispositionality, can resonate with those in power. In other words, the “usual suspects” will often receive nominal gratuitous rewards — appointments to menial positions, important hiring committees and some even receive “awards” for keeping their mouths shut. So yes, you may have still have an institutional racism problem. Take a look at who receives highly honored awards in your organizations … and ask why they receive them? [For instance, regarding institutions of higher education, look at endowed chairs, chancellor’s professors, even teaching awards]. You may have an institutionalized racism problem if there are few or no folks of color in the pool. Also note that if the award is granted for something diversity related, people of color tend to receive them. Again, see number 4 and ask whether the institution is rewarding the often accommodating “usual suspects.” Again, this may be an indication of a problem with institutionalized racism. When you are constantly looking for the “right fit,” and the “right fit” tends to always look like the rest of the folks that you have hired already, then you just might have an institutional racism problem. When given a chance to hire someone of color, but instead someone from your hiring committee or upper-level administration chooses to make a phone call to someone that they have known, and again, they tend to “fit” and look exactly like the majority of the institution, then your organization might have an institutionalized racism problem. Institutionalized racism occurs in a number of spaces and organizations. While I have made reference to employees, please know that students throughout the P-20 pipeline are the victims of institutionalized racism. Take a look at who is considered to be gifted and talented. Who is typically awarded advanced placement status? Who is most often referred to special education? Who is disproportionately expelled and suspended for minor infractions (if we must refer to an eye roll as an infraction. Sometimes I don’t know how I made it through high school given the number of eye rolls delivered on a daily basis.) Again, since racism is so deeply embedded in our culture, we cannot assume that those who benefit from a powerful system of privilege built on race will somehow learn to see or even want to see inequity and institutionalized systems of racism overnight. Yet, what messages do we send to younger human beings when everyone who resides in the neighborhood, attends school and other events, goes to the grocery store, or even attends worship service (which is by the way, the most segregated day of the week) is the same. Harrowing as it might seem (at least I think so), never exposing young folks to difference — any kind of difference — perpetuates the madness of institutionalized racism. However, if we think about it, and we truly want to end racism, then the first step is to recognize that we have a problem. Robin L. Hughes is an associate professor in higher education student affairs in the School of Education at Indiana University. She focuses on issues of race and sports in education and in society. END QUOTE
  5. Ditto... Walter Murch, won Academy Award for that work, and he was part of the group that came up with 5.1.
  6. Nice to hear that bhenry is recovering from the flood. So is that likely to occur again in that area?
  7. Quote from website below, so next year they will not send you a renewal notice like you got last year because they will not see a current inspection for you, they will send inspection renewal form. QUOTE Registration Renewal Process Here’s a more detailed overview of how renewing your vehicle’s registration will take place after March 1, 2015. Before issuing your registration renewal notice, TxDMV will check the state inspection records for your last inspection. If your inspection record cannot be found, is expired or failing, you will not receive a registration renewal notice. Instead, TxDMV will send you an Inspection and Registration Notice informing you that no record could be located. The notice will remind you that an inspection must be completed in order to renew your vehicle registration. END QUOTE Based on that I would say you are good. Congratulations, looks like you found a loophole.
  8. That's not the way I understand it. You still have to have your annual inspection but will not receive a sticker. The information will be sent electronically to Austin so they can verify that you have had an inspection prior to issuing your registration sticker when it's due. I agree but since I have been issued a registration sticker that is dated to expire in March 2016 I would only have to re-inspect prior to re-newal in 2016. According to some of the articles I have read the inspection cycle for a lot of folks will indeed be in excess of one year...the first year only (discounting the new vehicle rule with two years registration) Did they issue you a Feb 2016 sticker or a March 2016 sticker? March right?
  9. There is a calculator on that twostep site you can use. I entered March 2015 registration and February 2015 inspection sticker and it said you need to have a current inspection, however, I heard they don't start looking at inspection status until March 1st. That is consistent with what USNRET was able to do. I think technically you are supposed to have a current inspection with a March 2015 renewal date, but the system isn't checking yet. To me it seems like if they were able to check that for people who get stopped, like they can check the insurance status, they would issue a warning ticket. Of course, like you say, it is going to be a matter of who is stopping you. If you renew after March 1st, and have an inspection later in the year, September for example, you do not need to have an inspection until the following year. The calculator on the website confirms that, assuming the calculator is correct.
  10. That law is confusing. They are combining the inspection sticker with the registration sticker, so instead of two it will only be one. But some people's annual inspection date is out of synch with their registration date. In order to make it so people will not be required to have two inspections in one year (to get back in synch) people are allowed to delay their inspection one year in order to get back in synch. The key date, is if your registration renewal is on or after March of 2015. If you renewed in Jan. or Feb. of this year I believe you need to get synched up this year. Next year 2016 you have to bring in proof of your inspection with you need to have proof of inspection to renew because it is now a condition of registration whereas before it was a separate requirement. In other words, you could get your vehicle registered whether you had your vehicle inspected or not. This was passed in the last session and became effective 1/01/15.
  11. We should start a seperate thread on Quality of Health Care in US so that we might get Larry to chime in. He is one of the most knowledgeable people I know about medicine fron a policy perspective. I too read the Commonwealth Fund's rankings when they come out and hope for a change (at least I think that is the source of Mark's rankings). Here is a link to their site, and a breakdown of the factors used in the rankings and where the US is on every factor. We are much better is some factors, and the UK is clearly the model according to them. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/jun/mirror-mirror It is surprising that we are at the forefront of medical research and equipment, yet are so far behind in medical information technology. Travis
  12. The law of supply and demand would cure that problem if only the AMA were not such an effective lobby. Increasing numbers of physicians equals better consumer prices. It is just that simple. More doctors = lower costs. The only problem with your Hypothesis is there still exists a shortage.... Roger Roger, Read the entire post. The AMA has been successful in restricting the number of physicians by limiting medical school enrollment. They argue tat hospitals can only accommodate so many students, hence the enrollment is artificially limited. I don't really like using Wikipedia as a source, but in this instance they seemed to have a well up to date matrix of the currently accredited medical and osteopathic schools in the U.S. They also have a list of schools that are awaiting accreditation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medical_schools_in_the_United_States The Liaison Committee on Medical Education is the entity that accredits medical schools, they are funded in part by the AMA. Here is a link to their website http://www.lcme.org/directory.htm There is a separate entity that accredits D.O. schools. It doesn't look like the number of medical schools are keeping up with with population increases. When I graduated in 1986 it was a pretty universal notion that the AMA had the largest and most influential lobby in Washington. I think that must have lessened slightly as osteopaths were able to go in and influence state legislatures to allow them to do anything that an M.D. could do, at least in the non-surgical context. My understanding is that they are now pretty much the same, you can go on and do whatever specialized training you want to do with a D.O. Also in the 1986 time frame, if I recall correctly, there was a major shortage of nurses in the U.S. Hospitals were bringing in nurses from other countries, specifically the Philippines. It does not seem like we do the same with physicians. What is the situation with nursing schools in the U.S.? It seems like we need to do more to get the number of doctors up. I have a sister in medicine, and a close cousin here in Texas in nursing (NP, Phd RN). My cousin was able to get advanced certifications and degrees with special programs that were sponsored by her hospital where a group of nurses studied together, while continuing to work. The UTMB is in Galveston and they live about 2 hours North of there. It seems like they drove down for one long weekend a month, or twice a month, and every six weeks they went down for a week. She of course did this after her kids were grown. Texas seems to be embracing the "tiered approach" fully. There are urgent care facilities inside our HEB grocery stores, staffed by an NP. They write scripts and I don't know what else. I don't know whether they have to have a physician as a medical director or not. I heard they were phasing into freestanding clinics that were going to be entirely NPs. I went to one for a really bad cold/flu, and I think she obtained a very detailed history and, what I considered, a through exam. I think it is entirely a case of supply and demand, and it appears that it is going to take a good long while for there to be the right number of doctors. I think this system of licensing nurses as NPs should be utilized more fully, if it isn't in the process already. Travis
  13. I just remembered, Ty Longley, lead gutairist for Great White, died in fire started by pyrotechnics at night club while band was performing, along with 100 fans, at The Station in Rhode Island.
  14. Candygram. What is that, I don't know. What the hell is that.
  15. That is really cool. Where was that? Did you see her perform a full set or does she do a couple of songs these days?
  16. Looks like a lot of snow and very cold.
  17. So did you go check it out? Pick up anything?
  18. Very well said. Special interests above "We the people."
  19. When you look at the action, and then you look at the rhetoric, you realize there is a disconnect. It doesn't take too long to discern that the rhetoric exists to get people elected, while the actions(and results) are what the people actually stand for. For example, conservatism and conservatives say they stand for small government, and lower taxes. When they actually run government, though, it grows by leaps and bounds. Like wise when they say they want to lower taxes, they actually lower taxes that benefit themselves, create more loopholes for the upper tier of taxpayers so they can pay less, and throw out a piece of cake that the relative poor will receive an added benefit of enjoying the trickle down crumbs of what accidentaly falls out of someone's pocket. What we end up with is larger government, less tax income and larger deficits, people trying to spin what conservatism IS, and more jobs created by expanding WEALTH where folks ask you whether you want your extra value meal supersized. It doesn't compute. I like this, very well stated. People take positions they think are liberal or conservative, but which are in fact the opposite.
  20. You are confusing what some conservatives want or have done with what conservatism IS.Roger I'm not confused, "conservative" politicians are confused. Read William F. Buckley, the father od modern conservatism is this country, a true conservative. He was a staunch supporter of civil rights, eliminating antisemitism, and advocated for the legalization of all drugs. Travis
×
×
  • Create New...