Jump to content

psg

Regulars
  • Posts

    3503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by psg

  1. I don't care if people like and own fancy cables, but I do care when I see posts trying to convince new people to spend a huge amount on wire when they are budgeting $1000 for a receiver and $2000 on speakers.  Spending any extra money on better speakers and using monoprice wire is money better spent IMHO.  People are free to believe anything, but when they try to convince others that these beliefs are facts if when I start debates.

  2. I noticed that my Audiseey set these things at 120hz for subwoofer crossover...lol.

     

    Not sure if this is due to the x curve or not.

     

    X-Curve is high frequency attenuation only.  It should not affect low frequency extension at all.

  3.  

    Any thoughts on how we could defeat the X-Curve. I could always take apart the speaker and post some more pics of the crossover if needed. I believe there were some crossovers where you could just add a jumper wire around a point and it would defeat???

     

     

    That's the case with my (older) KPT-100, but each crossover is different of course.

  4. The specs include the X-Curve high-frequency attenuation:

     

    70Hz-20kHz +/- 3dB per X curve 49Hz -10dB

     

    So they are not 3 dB down at 20 KHz...They are around 10 dB down.  There's a frequency response plot in the PDF spec sheet.  It would be great if the X-Curve EQ was defeatable through a switch.

     

    Other note:

     

    Four threaded inserts in the cabinet rear are in a bolt pattern width of 2.75” (6.985cm) by 5” (12.7cm) height and accept four included 1/4-20 x 1.125 UNC 2A screws for a mounting bracket attachment.

     

    I would attach a 1/2" piece of plywood to the back of the speaker using those screws, and secure the plywood to the wall using a metal french cleat. No need to drill any new holes in the speaker when doing that.

    • Like 1
  5. Plasma in your lifetime is like your dad coming home with an Edsel.

    Everyone knows what a 100watt light is, now just throw in 14 more, yes your average PLASMA is 1500 watts.

    When your PLASMA breaks down, power supply is the norm, $600 bucks, deal with it.

    My trade before i retired, was dealing with this chit, i come to a forum with life long learned advice, i, as you have PAID the price also.

    I junked $100K systems consisting of PLASMA displays for company's throughout America.

    PLASMA = Chit.

    :huh:

     

    Plasma is where it's at for affordable high-quality picture (uniform deep blacks and color accuracy).  LEDs just don't compare and OLEDs are not affordable.

    • Like 1
  6.  

    You say that the claim that the simplification 'the larger the wire, the lower the resistance, and the higher the conductivity' is bogus, then go on to talk about quality of a cable and not its conductivity.

     

    Jimjimbo did not quote the whole statement where he declared it bogus however the whole statement said "from the point of sound quality" and I believe the whole statement is what he was referring to as "bogus". There is more to a good speaker wire and good sound quality than just being a large gauge conductive wire.

     

    The exact quote that was omitted is: The biggest issue in speaker cables, from the point of view of sound quality, is simply conductivity

     

    Nothing bogus about that.  Conductivity is the biggest issue by far, and it is controlled mostly by gauge.

  7. Reason I asked about the 120" at 10' is due to theoretical THX recommendations, you're supposed to take the distance in inches times 0.84 to get the recommended screen size, which at 10' is 100", and their recommendations are larger than they used to be, which is significantly larger than the SMPTE recommendations.  I've seen a 120" that close but didn't get to watch it for more than a minute or two, everything I've watched much on so far is 96-106" so I'm not sure how fatiguing it is that close.  I will likely get 100" on mine.  Wish I had built my house larger but good lord, we had already stretched the budget as much as we possibly could and I did as much stuff myself as I possibly could.  

     

    http://www.cedia.org/blog/how-to-select-the-right-screen-size-for-your-room

     

    Note that my 120-icnch screen is 16x9... It's effectively a 113-inch screen when I watch 2.35:1 content.

    Strangely, two of the last 3 Blurays I rented were 16x9!

    • Like 1
  8.  

    The answer to keeping conductivity high is simple: the larger the wire, the lower the resistance, and the higher the conductivity-----courtesy of blue jeans cable---
     

     

    Well, sorry, this is basic bogus.  -----courtesy of blue jeans cable----is not a very smart statement-----Simply being a large cable does not equal a quality cable......Quality of a cable is born from a combination of factors, a few of which are purity of the wire, construction, shielding, and size (and that's not all). 

     

     

    You say that the claim that the simplification 'the larger the wire, the lower the resistance, and the higher the conductivity' is bogus, then go on to talk about quality of a cable and not its conductivity.

     

    That claim is far from bogus.

  9. my next goal is to purchase a blu-ray player.

     

    do I need to be looking for anything specific in the blu-ray player in terms of audio decoding

     

    Is it necessary to have the DVD player support as many of these formats or will the HDMI or digital coax cable "pass-through" to the AVR with decoding/processing capabilities?

     

    Should I just be concerned with the specs of the AVR rather than the blu-ray player?

     

    I'd hate to spend $800 on a blu-ray player if I didn't have to

     

     

    You said "DVD player" in the title and once in the post, but I assume you really want to play Blurays, right?

    If you are not (1) upscaling video, (2) video processing (e.g., Darbee) or (3) sending decoded audio through analog cables, then really any $50 Bluray player will work about the same.  Spending more gets you features (wifi, better wifi, more CPU processing for faster smart content interaction, better smart menu interface, extra USB slots including one in the front and one ot more in the back, more output options such as twin HDMI, optical and coax audio outputs, multi-channel analog outputs and better DACs, better build quality, longer warranty, better remote, maybe metal with backlighting).  The fancier Oppos just about qualify as pre-amp/processors, switching digital inputs and converting to analog with volume control to output directly to power amplifiers.

  10.  

     

    The worst part of the AT screen and the whole projector/screen in general. Is the work to make it nice. Its such a big job that its really easy to talk yourself out of it.

    Seems like retrofitting would be even worse, that's why I thought the EluneVision motorized would be nice. Just mount the center and pull this thing down in front of it. Done. Trim out the ends with big RF-7ii's.

     

     

    Our Seymour is motorized.  We didn't bother with curtains, masks, or special lights, etc.  It is mounted on the ceiling in a music room / library, which becomes a home theater at the push of a button.  We do have black-out shades on the windows. The screen descends grandly and just fits between our two Klipschorns.  We've thought of playing Thus Spake Zarathustra as this happens.  The Belle Klipsch center is raised so the tweeter is the same height as those of the Khorns, and the Belle is buried in the wall (there is a bump-out behind it, to make room); the screen comes down in front of it, about a foot from the wall.  The flush mounting of the Belle was expected to increase the bass a bit, and it does, producing a -3dB point below 40 Hz.  For movies, that doesn't make a difference because of crossing over to the sub.

     

    It takes three strong individuals to mount the screen on the ceiling.

     

     

    My elunevision is also motorized.

    It also descends grandly and just fits between two Klipschorns.

    My La Scala center is also buried in the wall (there is a bump-out behind it, to make room).

    The screen comes down in front of it, about 6 inches from the wall.

    It takes me two individuals to mount the screen on the ceiling.  Mine is slightly inset into the ceiling; photo:

     

    gallery_13595_23_15090.jpg

  11. I have an AT screen to hide just one speaker and it's worth it to me just to have it at eye level instead of pushing an opaque screen up next to the ceiling.  It drops about 6 inches in front of the speaker, but I did that for another reason and not to clear the speaker by that much.

     

    Mine is an electric elunevision audioweave: http://www.elunevision.com/audioweave-tab-tensioned.html

    • Like 1
  12. I don't disagree that 60-70 Hz hits you in the chest. I didn't know that resonance is the reason;  the wavelength is very long so that's not exciting any oscillations, so it has to be frequency (time domain).  Do organs internally bounce back from a hit at that frequency?

    The chart here http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/37543/does-the-human-body-have-a-resonant-fequency-if-so-how-strong-is-it shows lots of response at very low frequencies (around 10 Hz) and the chest wall does indeed show up at 50 to 100 Hz (a fairly wide margin, but higher than the 10 Hz range). 

     

    This paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9306739 has the resonance of standing humans at 12 to 13 Hz.

  13. I know what harmonic distortion is.  How do they play a roll in the chest thump sensation.  If your chest cavity resonated at 60-70 Hz, what difference do the 120-140 Hz distortion frequencies make in that sensation?

     

    Who says it's 60-70 Hz?  That's a wavelength of order 5 m...  It has to be much higher than that if we are talking resonance...

  14. I just saw "Gravity" on blu-ray and I am speechless.

     

    Not only was this movie an incredible story, everything else about it was unbelievable.

     

    Up to there, I was thinking the same as you...

    The story is incredible, as in impossible to believe.  The guy played by Clooney had basically stopped moving, yet he unties himself and it's like there's 'gravity' to pull him away.  Made no sense.  And then the impossible jumps, one after the other...

     

    The images were eye candy, but the story?

    Ah well...

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...