djbeatz

Well, here... I have updated my list. (Check the very top of this post to see my new list.) Please note that my list includes Near-Fields only! After extensive researching and inquiry, I've formed the assumtion that the JBL LSR 6300 & 4300 Series are the best Near-Field monitors currently available (that I'm aware of.) Not only is their frequency response wider than any of the other near-fields I know of, but they are also the flattest (in fact, they're "better" than flat, according to their company terminology.) I'm not gonna get into a "game of semantics" here, but I'm fully aware of what they mean by that. Basically they are touting the usefulness of the extensive EQ-ing options that their near-fields provide. I'd be gald to add other companies and/or product lines to my list. If anyone here believes anything else is worthy of inclusion, by all means, Please tell me! So whadya think? Any input you can gimme? Anyone?

The "Soundblaster X-Fi X-Treme Music" ...I hate that name so much... *shudders*

Good point! BTW, could there be any dangers using this approach?... Simply connect my monitors to the "Front L/R" channels on my soundcard, and connect the Promedia System (sub -AND- sats) to the "Rear L/R" channels. Then I could just turn off the Promedia system when mixing/mastering, and turn off the monitors when "referencing" the mix, to hear how it'd sound on an "average listener's" system.

I'm not arguing with you here, but I was told that it's best to use a sub to reproduce lower frequencies, because it takes the load off of the low-end drivers of the monitors. Someone once put it to me like this: "Just because a monitor's low-end driver can reproduce 35Hz, doesn't mean it SHOULD." Please let me know if there is any truth to this. It's not beneficial? Is that because multimedia subs aren't meant to sound "flat," so it defeats the purpose of using one?

thanx for the help, Dr. Who. I really appreciate it. BTW, when you say the Mackies can play louder and have a flatter freq. response than the Events, you are referring to: Mackie 824 vs. Event ASP8 Am I correct?

Pretty soon I will be buying studio monitors, which are pretty much the last thing I need to buy for my DIY studio. The models that I am considering are: JBL LRS 4328, Mackie HR824, Event ASP8, DynAudio BM15a, and DynAudio BM6a. I have 2 questions however: Could foam-filled cabinets (such as Mackie HR824s) ignite or overheat? Can any of the aforementioned studio monitors be paired with my Klipsch Promedia 2.1 or 5.1 sub?

...accidental double post, sorry.

I know, but I was just wondering why you pointed it out. You said: "Though the ASP's sound better, you're going to have a hard time trying to maximize the feeling of immersion on other systems." So I was just wondering if perhaps I used the term "immersive" incorrectly? I was also wondering if it's possible that the ASP8s might actually "exaggerate" the stereo width? If that is so, then I agree with you: it's an un-desirable trait, even though it may sound pleasing!

BTW, Dr. who... What do you mean by "feeling of immersion"? Could you ellaborate please?

Thanks Dr. Who, you are correct about that: I AM looking for monitors to produce the flattest, most transparent, most accurate playback possible. When I said that the Event "sounded better" what I meant was that they seem to have more extended high and low ranges in comparison with the other monitors. I should also thank you for your monitor suggestions which you made to me quite some time ago. It was your response to one of my previous threads, in which you suggeseted I try the following 3 monitors, that prompted me to visit Guitar Center and check them (and the others) out: ART SLM-1 Studio Monitors & SLA-1 Power Amp Package ($400) Event Tuned Reference 8 TR8 Active Monitors ($500) Mackie HR624 Active Studio Monitor ($450) (I'm sure there are high-end "pro-audio" places in my city, which probably sell studio monitors as well, but I haven't bothered to check yet.)

.

I have trimmed down my NEAR-FIELD ONLY monitor list to the 4 models I am considering most likely buying. In decsending order of quality (with #1 being the best, and therefore my most likely choice) ...here is my UPDATED list: #1. JBL LSR 4328P #2. Event ASP8 #3. DynAudio BM15a #4. Mackie HR824 A non-exhaustive list of criteria that determine whether or not models are elgible for inclusion in my monitor list above is included here... In no particular order: Price: Max Budget (approx. $1200) Price: Bang/Buck Freq. Response: Width Freq. Response: Uniformity Availability: Replacement Parts Availability: Retail Outlets Space Considerations Manufacturer Reputation Support Criteria that influenced my current opions are: Imaging Dynamics Frequency Response Volume Price: Bang/Buck Comparisons are based on the following info sources: Manufacturer's Specs Independant Spec verification (if available) Personal subjective testing Other's reviews ===================================== So... Can anyone give me their personal advice or opinion on my findings? I already have beginner's knowledge on the usage and setup of monitors, and I'm aware of a few companies who have rather outstanding reputations. Nevertheless, I'm always on the lookout for a good deal and hoping to learn even more about the recording industry and about studio monitor concepts and technology. I'd love to know if there are any other companies whose products should be taken into consideration for my list! I'd also like to know if there are any additonal criteria which I SHOULD HAVE included in my comparisons, or that I did not weigh heavily enough. Please let me know, CYA!

Can someone please tell me which Telarc recording of "1812 Overture" has the best/deepest/etc bass response? (I've read several negative reviews about one that used digital cannons, so apparently not all recordings of this piece are of equal quality.)

Can someone please explain how I go about setting which frequencies go to the sub and which go the sats when using a "real" subwoofer/amp enclosure (i.e. NOT a multimedia sub) ??? Also, could you please explain how to go about hooking up my promedia 2.1 sats to a "real" subwoofer/amp enclosure (i.e. NOT a multimedia sub) for home use? I've done research on home theater and bookshelf systems on google, but still I need help.

Forgive me if this question is stupid, but... What are the required and optional components for monitoring output in a recording studio? (This is assuming I'll be using my high-end PC soundcard.) I am a complete noob. If I understand correctly, the signal chain flows like so: 1.) Soundcard (3 discreet analog outputs; 1/8'' connectors) 2.) Control Pod (5.1s and Ultras use these) 3.) Amp (within sub enclosure or external) 4.) Cossover network (within sub enclosure; unchangeable in the case of PM 5.1 Ultras) 5.) Speaker-level output (to speakers/sub) I have 3 questions: 1.) How many components have I forgotten to list aove? 2.) Where would the pre-amp fit into this scheme? 3.) And what components would I need if I were setting up a DVD theatre/music-playback system, instead of a music studio recording/monitoring system?