Jump to content

Billzumwalt

Regulars
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Billzumwalt

  1. On 8/18/2017 at 2:16 PM, djk said:

    " When ever I use my Sansui 5000x I am in hurry to replace it.   "

     

    Back in the day I fixed a ton of those.

     

    The original design was such a POS that Sansui offered a completely new design board for replacement (rather than repair).

     The earlier 5000 and maybe 5000a did have a problematic driver board, The most of the 5000x's had a better driver board, like mine. 

  2. Oh well, same thing happened to me.  I heard a set of these when I bought the Cornwalls but the guy would not sell the crossovers. So I ordered a set and then he lets me know they are for sale !  Best thing ever for the Klipsch. I had the B3 klipsch crossovers and these made a dramatic improvement all across the board. And contrary to some opinions, they sound great at all volume levels, low , medium, and high. 

     

    IMG_8293.JPG

    IMG_8292.JPG

  3.  A set of AlK engineering  Crossover set. two ea. AP12-600,  and two ea. ES 5800 extreme slope. 

    • AP12-600 
    • This one is intended for the Belle Klipsch or the La Scala using squawker drivers or horns that will not safely go down to 500 Hz. The crossover is at 600 Hz.  This the preferred crossover for The Klipsch Cornwall, Cornwall II, and Corn Scala , Corn Altec etc.  These have the midrange level adjustable Autoformer 1 db steps.  These are $350 new plus fedex shipping .   
    • ES 5800  

      The 5800 Hz crossover is the recommended frequency for most applications. All versions uses ClarityCaps in the signal path to the tweeter EXCEPT the ES7500. Solen astCaps are used as ClarityCaps are not available in the required value for that crossover frequency.

      All have adjustable tweeter level settings of 0, -3, -5, -7 and -9 dB attenuation. Auto former . 

      The bi-amp version allows mid-range setting from 3 to 18 dB in 1 dB steps.      These are $ 420 new plus fedex 

    • I will sell both sets together  $700  fedex included to Continental/Contiguous USA

      call, text or email

      5one2 590 9234

      billzumwalt@hotmail.com

    •  

    IMG_8275.JPG

  4. The phono stage feeds into the line stage which goes into the phase invertor driver stage which feeds the power tubes. 

     Probably a slightly microphonic tube, could be a capacitor. I have even encountered microphonic wire. 

    Put some heat shrink tubing on the preamp tubes. It will damping the ringing a bit. Most tube phono stages have a bit of microphonics. 

  5. If the amplifier designer knew what they were doing it is best to use the type tube it was originally designed for. There are different bias requirements for each tube type. And different wiring requirements sometimes. There are different heater currents for different tubes even if all the other requirements are met. 

     An El34 can be swapped for a 6l6gc if the tube socket is wired to accept both, but the bias range is much different. Maybe the designer allowed enough range of adjustment. The heater current is nearly double in the el34 vs the 6l6. Maybe the design built in enough current capacity ?. 

     Grid load resistors are another variable , a 6l6 or el34 might use 220k but a 6550a or kt88 would be better with 50k. 

     I would stick with what the designer specified for the best performance. 

     Better quality tubes will make a difference, especially if the amplifier is very well designed and other associated components are of very high (revealing) quality. 

    • Like 1
  6. I have been using a pv12 and premier 11a for many years. 

     Have not heard better. 

    I am using all nos tubes and it made a big difference . 

     The most problematic tube is the 12au7 line stage in the pv12. 

    I found the rca clear tops to be the most rugged in that position. The amperex bugle boys are the best sounding though. The rca's are cheap and easy to find though and sound very good. I think cj did not use a grid stop resistor and it's makes the stage very fussy. 

     the second half is a cathode follower and they can be hard on the tube as well. 

     

    The phono one stage is wonderful and 3D with bugle boys. 

     

    Nos tubes are expensive but usually outlast and outperform modern tubes by a wide margin. 

     I have the same set of rca 6550a in the pr 11a for over ten years. Same for the small signal tubes. I have a combination of rca and tungsols .  There are no electrolytic caps in either of my amps just film caps even in the power supply. 

    • Like 2
  7. I have an identical set of cornwalls. 1983 with B3 crossovers , drivers all identical. 

    I went with the ALK AP12-600 and ES5800 crossovers, a marked improvement over the B3. 

     Crites are nicely made but no real improvement to stock except fresh capacitors.  If you stay stock just change the black square motor run cap and save up for the ALK's . 

  8. I recently did some work on a pair heresys from 1976. They had the oil caps. I expected to change them but I took the time to test them for value , leakage and esr.

     I found them to be spot on in all regards. So I left them. 

     The speakers sounded fine, balanced etc. there were some bad corroded connections and loose driver mounting screws. 

     

     I just spoke with the original owner and he says they sound as good as ever. 

     I know certain types of caps good bad , i.e. Most old NPE . I've replaced plenty with poly caps with big improvements. 

     

     But maybe those oil filled cans have a better life expectancy. 

  9. I've had the B3s before too.   They aren't that bad with a recap.

    K33 ported sounds much more snappy with ESN.

     The original B3 caps measure right on with my rebuilt Heathkit IT28.  I had previously installed a Stainless Steel screw thru the Coil as the original one was magnetic.

     

     ESN ?  extreme slope network ? 

     

     Been doing some more listening and I'll keep the ALK's. Its like now I just enjoy the music.

  10. I just installed a set of ALK AP12-600 and ES5800 crossovers into my Klipsch Cornwall's.

    I am using a Conrad Johnson PV12 and Premier 11a.

    The original crossovers were the Klipsch B3 type. These were not bad at all, at the lowest levels I usually listen too.

    But, I frequently listen at higher levels so I thought I'd try the ALK's.

    They are a very nice improvement indeed. I did set the tweeter level to -5 on the attenuator, it was set at -3 from ALK.

    I left the mid range set to -6 db .

    The bass seems to be firmer and a bit more defined. There seems to be a bit more snap to blues and jazz drumsets on the recordings I just listened too. The mid range has a bit more clarity and a bit less blare, I have the original Klipsch metal horn and ceramic driver, which I believe to be a klipsch made driver just after the Heppner series.

    The Tweeter is also a ceramic K77m metal horn. I actually find the tweeter to sound just fine, but my hearing is a bit compromised after all these years. I did a test with a signal generator and I can still hear to 17K.

    I do notice an improved sound stage as well. A bit more depth and locations are well defined, more layers to the instrument positions. At a few moments I felt the stage was wider and some sounds appeared to the out side of the speakers as well.

    My first impression was the B3 crossovers were fuller bodied , but upon further listening the ALK are the clear winner with better clarity, detail and imaging. At lower levels they sound fine. I was afraid after reading reviews, the lower levels would be compromised , but I do not think so.

    The B3 crossovers are congested at moderate levels and beyond, probably at lower levels too, its just not objectionable at the lowest levels.

    I paid as much for the crossovers as I did for the Cornwall, But I am well satisfied so far.

    billy z

×
×
  • Create New...