Jump to content

DizRotus

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    11774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by DizRotus

  1. "p.s. I wont even bore you with how he "lost" my mint condition 1967 mustang back when I left for college!"

    All '67 Mustangs were "mint condition" when I left for college.

    That does date one as almost old.

    You can delete the "almost." I arrived at MSU in the fall of 1967. I'm OLD.
  2. I'd like to build one or two of these! Looks easy!

    after seeing your build images for the Tuba, this will be like a walk in the park for you. Plus, since most lumber I get in Mich. is all made in Canada, I'd like to think it's a few dollars cheaper for you since the truck ride is shorter. Je pense que c"est des bonnes nouvelles pour toi.

    I haven't been to his house yet, but Dr. Earl Geddes lives about 15 minutes from me. He is a speaker home theater guru and is all about oblate spheroid waveguides and compression drivers on the top, and MULTIPLE subwoofers (at least 3) for the bottom. From the reports from people who have been there and amazed, he has 3 subs tuned to different bands in different locations in the room to smooth out peaks and valleys in different listener positions.

    You may well end up doing the same, eh?

    The Gedlee site of Earl Geddes. No stranger to superlatives.

    http://www.gedlee.com/

  3. djk

    FWIW, I appreciate the satirical video at the web address above. It's something that deserves to be viewed and discussed.

    However, IMHO, this thread is not the best place for such a discussion. The service men and women, for whom appreciation is owed, are not the policy makers. Gratitude for their service ought to be apolitical.

  4. Thanks for the additional info.

    Glad to understand that you're not critical of sniping.

    I ONLY bid through a sniping service. The cost of 10 cents/winning bid is insignificant. My bids get placed with 5 seconds left in the auction. It's impossibvle for someone to raise my bid. A manual bid is too risky, IMO.

    You and the seller were lucky there was not a sniped bid with a max of $299. Your $180 bid would have been automatically raised to $185 (or whatever the bid increment). At two minutes, there was time for someone to manually raise your bid. If you tried to bid $190 at the close of the auction, a last second sniped bid with a max greater than $190 would have won.

  5. Exactly, I did not want to rip someone off on a single La Scala at one point. He had it mislabled on eBay and it could have been had for about $200. I did not want to rip the guy off. He made a mistake on the listing and could not pull it in the last 24 hours. Instead of letting someone snipe it, we worked out a deal where I bed $300 and if anyone beat it, he would take the money. If I won it, we would not make the transaction. He was extremely happy especially when two people tried snipe it at $150 and $175. So he was happy. He ended up making a good deal with a friend of mine in the area. It became a kind of "Pay It Forward" thing.

    First, I think you did a good thing, under the circumstances. But the person who "sniped" at $175, as well as eBay, would probably disagree. You probably volated eBay's rules regarding "straw bidders", but the spirit of your actions was well intended.

    Conversely, I wouldn't criticize anyone who feels the eBay seller sould have listed the item properly and set a reserve, if less than $300 was acceptable. An eBay user is not the wholly innocent widow at her garage sale.

    Did you put in an eBay maximum bid at $300, or a sniped bid with a $300 maximum? If neither, how did the otherwise high bid ($175?) not win the auction?

    Last, the way you use the term "snipe" suggests a negative view of sniped bids. In any case, please share your thoughts on the merits of sniping.

  6. In looking through all of the referenced threads, I found reasonable observations from both perspectives and did add my own perspective; however, while we can discuss the “theoretical” impact of each view, the actual impact from either view most likely cannot be isolated and quantified with any precision.

    I do see where the forum threads show up in search engines such as Google more rapidly than the actual advertisements on Craig’s list shows up on Google. I suppose that this incongruity eliminates any advantage that the dedicated forager has over the common "profiteers" and “flippers” of merchandise, hence taking all the fun out of the old scavenger hunt. However, I believe we cannot quantify how many of the "profiteers" and “flippers” have already scanned Craig’s list and found an item there first rather than a Google search.

    From what I have gathered by reading the various, expressed views on the referenced threads, I believe that there may be a much larger and immeasurable issue at hand.Sad

    Essentially, we may be finding out that the multitude of communication avenues available to us, as individuals with internet savvy, has made the “deal of the century” treasures more of the rare exception, rather than commonplace, and in the process we are exposed to more duplicitous people than ever before.Ick!

    Add ubiquitous shows like “antique road show,” “pawn shops,” “pickers” and “storage wars” to the equation and now everyone will want “top dollar” for every piece of “landfill scrap.”Zip it!

    Has the “big business and profits over everything else” mentality finally taken the fun out of the old scavenger hunt?Sad

    I agree that the dynamincs of selling used items has been seriously and permanently altered by the Internet, and the TV shows you mentioned. The balance of power seems to have shifted toward sellers. While it's harder to get a deal on a late husband's "ugly plywood boxes" (Las Scalas) that a widow wants hauled away, it's easier to eventually sell that windfall for a fair price.

    We all take turns being buyers or sellers. I'm willing to share information to the ultimate benefit of all, even if sweetheart deals for buyers go extinct. No one forces buyers, whether informed or ignorant, to pay more than the buyer feels an item is worth. Contrast that to the uninformed seller who sells way below market to an informed buyer who can then turn the item at a more treasonable market price. If shared knowledge results in more bilaterally fair sales, I'm willing to sacrifice the opportunity for the individual's windfall.

    Make no mistake, I'm not suggesting that a buyer doesn't have the right to score a great deal. But each person has to decide when a "great deal" for one party is unfair to the other party. Even Rick, on Pawn Stars, and Mike, on American Pickers, have offered sellers more than they were asking, when to do otherwise would have been unfair.

    For me, I wouldn't scalp an individual, such as the aforementioned widow. Conversely, I wouldn't hesitate to skin a professional re-seller who hadn't done the research to know the market value of the item being sold. My opinions only. You're free to disagree.

  7. I am a fan of the Tuba subs and intend to build one soon. They get usable output well into the teens.

    Dave

    Dave,

    Am I correct that a Danley is a tapped horn and Tuba sub is something else? If so, what are the differences and why do you prefer a Tuba over a tapped horn?

  8. LOL -as far as camera It was all I had on me at the time... will get some higher res shotsasap

    Mike,

    Glad you can take a joke. So far it looks like they're the real thing or excellent DIY efforts.

    Rcarlton said, "They look like the real thing to me...but...no badges?"

    "Badges? . . . We don't need no badges . . . "

    Please see the photos in the thread

    (http://forums.klipsch.com/forums/t/120479.aspx). Those were '54 & '56 Khorns with nary a badge in sight. Perhaps PWK wasn't into badges in the '50s.

  9. Bruce,

    I agree, but then I'm not into explosion movies on a regular basis. The gun shots (Open Range) and explosions (Master and Commander) in Glenn aka Picky's home theater are awsome and would not be the same without the subs, but I can still enjoy films without also having my organs (or my budget) shaken.

  10. Mike,

    Please get more photos of the cabinets, especially the bass bins. Do you have a camera that you can't also use to order pizza?[;)]

    I'm not yet convinced that these are DIY. The widow's recollection of "some assembly required" may be consistent with factory built.

    A tardy welcome!

  11. 1) Should I be concerned with the age of the wood?

    I wouldn't be. Absent water damage, the wood ages well.

    2) How do the these horns/mid driver fend against other combos?

    They do well. If the bass bins are DIY, their value as audio antiques is probably diminished. Also, it would then make less sense, IMO, to update them.

    3) When I auditioned them, they sounded incredible . . . How do I test the caps?

    Consider leaving well enough alone, except as to the caps. Don't bother testing 50+ y.o. caps, replace them. Contact Bob Crites, BEC on this forum

    4) During the audition she wasn't afaid to give em juice and like I said they sang.. They got way down low.. So as far as woofers would it be safe to say that have cloth surrounds?

    Yes. Whether Stephens, Jensen, University or EV, they should be fine. Cloth surrrounds were typical in the 50s; foam or rubber surrounds were not.

    Can you say Deja Vu? When I first met the woman referred to in the thread below, she'd already sold her late father's Mac tube gear and had been offered $800 for a similar pair of Khorns.

    http://forums.klipsch.com/forums/t/120479.aspx

    More photos will be nice. Your idea to include the seller is great. Perhaps a photo of the builder is also available. Enjoy the experience. Thanks for sharing.

×
×
  • Create New...