Jump to content

glens

Regulars
  • Posts

    2337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by glens

  1. Having a DAC with which you're already satisfied, I' d be inclined to opt for an optical transport of some kind which only  provides digital output.  There'd be no need, in my mind, to get a full-on "player" which merely duplicates something already downstream.  Sounds like it would be needless expenditure at any rate.

    • Like 1
  2. Hard to beat the utility of NAD C 338.  https://nadelectronics.com/product/c-338-classic-digital-dac-amplifier/

     

    I picked up a factory refurb from Crutchfield earlier this year.  It meets all my needs except for maybe a couple percent of the time lacking the ability to modify tonal balance.  As well, there are no means of inserting external signal processing equipment into the loop if you're considering doing that at all.

  3. On 9/20/2017 at 8:45 PM, buf said:

    ...

    They [Forte IIIs] are very close on most sonic parameters. Tonal balance and smoothness are about the same... Their general tonal character is no different from my Thiels.

    ...

    I use a sub with both my Thiels and Fortes...

     

    It's now been a year and change.  Still running the Fortes?  Has your impression of them altered appreciably?  

    • Like 1
  4. On my stupid phone at lunch so unable to provide a direct link, but am sure there's a "pro" model that's all but the forte iii and has a rotatable horn(s) panel for horizontal positioning.  Same horns/drivers I think, but is front-firing bass reflex.

     

    KI-362-SMA-II

×
×
  • Create New...