Jump to content

michaelwjones

Regulars
  • Posts

    602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by michaelwjones

  1. 44 minutes ago, babadono said:

      From the wiki article cited:

    Moreover, many audiophiles are willfully ignorant of the fallibility of human hearing.

     

    Somewhere is those cable articles was a statement that "hearing memory" of the prior sound has effectively dissipated in less than 30 seconds. Better switch fast...

    • Like 1
  2. A new smaller house is in the works, so it is with great regret I offer these Walnut La Scala IIs. They are “B” stock due to the mismatched veneer, but who cares when you view the entire speaker (and I seldom look at the sides of them)? I am somewhat OCD about audio equipment and the prior owner was just as “careful;" they are flawless. I keep a sheet over them when not in use (the gray sheets are included). These loudspeakers have no issues. They are as sonically & visually stunning as you would expect. I suspect there will be no WAF issues when they are viewed. The photographs really don't convey the total impact of the reddish tones and dark veining. They nearly match my 70th anniversary Heresys in color & veining. They are stunning in person (hyperbole until you sell them yourself).

     

    While I have the boxes, I will not ship them. That requires pallets & strapping. I sold my F-150 (no one needs a diesel right now) so delivery is not an option. I’m south of Nashville and north of DaveA, so make a country music weekend out of it. You are welcome to audition them (sorry, no SS; tubes rule) or just pick them up on the fly; your call.

     

    So to recap:

     

    -La Scala IIs

    -Walnut

    -Original Boxes

     

    Any questions? Please message me. Thanks!

    LS II 2 5.jpeg

    LS II 2 4.jpeg

    LS II 2 3.jpeg

    LS II 2  2.jpeg

    LS II 2.jpeg

    LS II 2 6.jpeg

    LS II Boxes - 1.jpeg

    LS II 2 7.jpeg

    • Like 7
  3. 1 hour ago, Dave A said:

    Ceramic tile will not unless you have tile with heavy iron content. 

     

    Now I'm hosed; I have a concrete floor in my listening room. Better excavate some of it to determine the iron content. Whoa; that means you too Dave. That rebar in our floors could interfere with the flow...   😂

    • Haha 1
  4. 7 hours ago, Steve. said:

     The only negative about the Horn Mono is it's screw down speaker terminals.

     

    While this is probably the designer's way of keeping the connections simple & cost effective, as well as steering us to use bare wires, I also found it annoying when I want to trade out speakers. I bought a pair of these "banana adapters" on fleabay for about $12. They work perfectly.

     

    As to the Horn amps themselves; dead quiet on my LSIIs. You have to spend three times their cost to get more resolution. No transformer noise, either. They have one design parameter: to power high efficiency horn speakers.  Stereophile concluded:

     

    The Quicksilver Horn Mono is very much my kind of amplifier: a solid, no-nonsense product singularly lacking in quirkiness, with design principles that involve no extravagant or controversial claims. Intended primarily for use with high-sensitivity loudspeakers—a purpose for which it is eminently suited—the Horn Mono can also work well with speakers of just slightly higher than normal sensitivity. 

    Although the Horn Mono doesn't offer the ultimate in every parameter of sonic performance, its presentation is always convincing in musical terms. I recommend it especially for audiophiles who can just stretch their budget to go for a pair of Avantgardes or other expensive horns

     

    https://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/581/index.html

     

    My experience tracks with that.

     

    And with only 3 tubes per amp its not terribly expensive to swap tubes from EL34s to KT88s. either.

     

    They have no WAF, by the way.

     

     

    terminal adapters.jpeg

  5. 1 minute ago, seti said:

     

    It's all fun till something catches fire.

     

     

    😂😂😂

     

    How true. I can't begin to describe my expression when 4 caps in a power supply let go at once. Eyes like saucers would be apt.

  6. I found this on the internet, so it must be true...

     

    Typical Rectifier Voltage Drops

     

    • 5Y3 – 60 volts @ 125 mA

    • 5U4GB – 50 volts @ 275 mA

    • 5U4 – 44 volts @ 225 mA

    • 5V4 – 25 volts @ 175 mA

    • 5AR4 – 17 volts @ 225 mA

     

    As a safety note – you can generally go “down” but not always “up”. This means you can generally put a 5U4 or 5Y3 in an amp that had a 5AR4, but it is not recommended to put a 5AR4 or 5U4 in an amp that had a stock 5Y3. The increase in voltages may be too much for the other components in the amplifier.

     

    Actually it came from a gear forum of guitar amps.

     

    I have a variety of rectifiers, some great others no so great, that would be interesting to roll. Let's assume the numbers in the above blurb have some basis in reality. Am I correct in reading you could (all other things being equal) run a rectifier of greater voltage drop in place of one with a lesser voltage drop? Thus, "down" means more voltage drop?  Yes, I understand that is pretty much exactly what it says, but I'd have a greater comfort level if some here chimed in.

     

    Thanks in advance.

  7. 1 hour ago, fourdogslong said:

     

    Anyway, how's tube life with the horn mono, how 's reliability / maintenance?

     

    Not sure, but QuickSilver has been around since 1981, far longer than PrimaLuna. I don't recall reading either is hard on tubes or prone to reliability issues.

     

    The key to the Horn amps is they were designed specifically for very high efficiency horn loudspeakers. They'll work in other applications, but horns are their target speakers.

  8. 12 hours ago, fourdogslong said:

    Do you think I would like the horn mono amp with the type of music I like.

    Yes; I listen to everything (except metal) and the Horns perform well on all genres. Its the absolute lack of background noise that make them so satisfying to me. I run them on my LaScala IIs and when placing my ear within an inch of the speaker there is no sound whatsoever. 

     

    For Heritage speakers, I stand by everything in my previous post. They are a great value even a full retail.

  9. 13 hours ago, babadono said:

    I want to make sure I understand...I bought a brand new pair of speakers for $5000 with money I already paid income taxes on. I enjoyed them for 10 years. Being a normal joe wage slave I could not write off any portion of this expense as capital acquisition or depreciate any of it over the years. I sell them for $2000 to some other normal joe and the $2000 is income to me? Sounds more like I had a $3000 loss.

     

    If you use PayPal Goods & Services to receive the $2000, you & the IRS will receive a 1099 showing $2000 income. You are no longer a normal joe wage slave: you are are now a self employed captain of industry!  At that point you need to have records to show the loss to offset the $2000. This is a pretty good recap of the issues involved:

     

    https://www.keepertax.com/posts/paypal-1099

     

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  10. 2 hours ago, RealMarkDeneen said:

    I haven't been describing my "risk" of using PPAL, I'm describing the risk to an open society represented by PPAL's authoritarian practices, and the lack of rigorous regulation by those we elect to carry out those duties for us. I don't mind saying that the worst possible people rushng in to fill that gaping void.

     

     

    Fascinating, but Dave's original post was "So, my question is what is the most popular alternative amongst my fellow Klipsch heads? Now that having been said I own nothing Apple nor want anything to do with them so Apple Pay is out. What are YOU using?"

  11. 36 minutes ago, RealMarkDeneen said:

    Individual self-appointed authorities who claim to be arbiters of mis-information have the burden to demonstrate the details of that process...

     

    In this purported instance, they did: PayPal’s sole discretion.

     

    Back in the day, we had a bumper sticker that read "A**, Gas or Grass: nobody rides for free" We used to think it was clever. Turns out it's true. There is no free lunch either. I can't think of anything that does not have some "terms of service." Even death has rules, but in the end, we don't have to care about that. Everyone has the right to pick up their marbles and find another game. But, none of this answers Dave's question.

     

    I'm using PayPal, in either mode, or cash. I have asked about MOs, but received "blank stares" in response. Most people are tied to the convenience of PP and plastic money and if I'm buying, it's their call how they want to be paid. If I am uncomfortable with that, my option is to not buy.

     

    I think the safest move is to decide what minimizes your risk, whatever that is. I am not aware of other peer to peer payment systems that offer PP's protection or convenience. Venmo, Zelle & wire transfers are one way streets; taking credit cards is an option, as are the old standbys of checks, money orders and cash.

  12. 3 minutes ago, Dave A said:

    No the big complaint is social credit scoring and policing of thoughts THEY don't like as self appointed moral authorities enforcing their desires in ways they think they can get away with.

     

    I understand, but its their sandbox... just like this is Klipsch's sandbox. 

    • Like 1
  13. 1 minute ago, Dave A said:

    Yes and the first amendment means I don't have to agree to their policing of my thoughts because a few in authority there don't like them.

    Absolutely. We just need to determine the best way to avoid what we find unconscionable. I find it annoying I now have to keep records for trying audio equipment, selling and moving on to the next piece. I'm not making a profit, but its still shows as income.

  14. Isn't what we are really complaining about is the IRS figured out we were transferring money willy nilly and a portion of that is, in reality, income? Now we either have to become good record keepers or find another manner of payments. I suggest we go back to money orders or accepting checks assuming they clear. Certainly this will take instantaneous gratification and impulse buying out of the picture, but it does offers some relief for tracking income. Of course, face to face and cash still work, too.

  15. 9 minutes ago, jjptkd said:

     

     If you google Paypal 2500 you'll see what all the hub bub is about.

     

     

    ""You may not use the PayPal service for activities that … involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials that, in PayPal’s sole discretion … promote misinformation.""

     

    I can live with that. And I could care less if Elon "freaks out." IMHO he's not too highly wrapped anyway.

     

    Everyone who does anything has a set of rules they act under. No returns without receipt; you must be this tall to ride, etc.  Its our choice who we interact with. If people have a problem with PayPal, there are other services for payment or even face to face. Most of us used money orders or checks before PP. They are still available for use.

     

    I thought a free market allowed these folks to make billions. Isn't that the cornerstone of the founding of the US? Why do you think the Dutch flocked here after they landed hundreds of years ago? To make money.

    • Like 1
  16. 51 minutes ago, RealMarkDeneen said:

     They fall into that basket of "billionaire-backed social re-engineering" firms that have already gained too much power over free-expression. 

     

    PayPal is a publicly traded entity. Vanguard (as in mutual funds) is the largest single shareholder. Private individuals own less than 7% of the company (less than Vanguard). In reality, they are a payment system that is morphing into banking. They own Venmo, BTW.

     

    https://money.cnn.com/quote/shareholders/shareholders.html?symb=PYPL&subView=institutional

     

    And how does the manner I pay for something impact "free-expression?"

     

    57 minutes ago, RealMarkDeneen said:

    These companies are flooding the zone...

     

    When I lived in a flood zone, I bought flood insurance... from the government.

×
×
  • Create New...