SWL Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'm curious to know how many of you guys are bi-amping........and how are you doing it with what kind of results? Also, guys that are active bi-amping......what kind of active crossovers are you using presently? Crossovers used in the past? Good ones.....Bad ones....and why? Thanks, Scott. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deang Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Less is more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest " " Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 currently using a DIY tube crossover. also have some op amp versions, but don't use them much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 yeah sure I bi-amp, even tri-amp my PA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNRabbit Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Let me share something different I tried recently with my Sunfire system & Carver AL-III speakers: I am now actively bi-amping (with stock AL-III crossovers still inplace) my AL-IIIs through my Sunfire Theater Grand-IV preamp by running the Mains with a150 hz crossover as small speakers out to two of my Sunfire Cinema Grand (400~7) channels andon to the RIBBONS ONLY. Then I run the Sub 2 & 3 output (below150 hz) to two more 400~7 channels and on to the WOOFERS ONLY. I have a Klipsch RT-12d sub running off the Sub 1 output from the TG-IV which I've adjusted down -12dB from reference, crossover set at 40 hz w/ a 48 db/octave slope. I'm running the woofer outputs on the TG-IV at -3 dB from reference. I'vebeen using this setup for about 2 weeks now and let me tell you it'sINCREDIBLE how much more headroom I've gotten out of this setup (at least 6dB). I can drive it to MUCH higher levels now with less distortion anddon't blow fuses as often as I used to. I can actually feel "puffs" ofair from the forward firing port of the woofers up to 15 feet away (over 20 feet with the cannons on SACD of 1812 Overture~)! Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWL Posted January 8, 2009 Author Share Posted January 8, 2009 Bi-amping solves some problems and introduces some new ones. Now you know where I'm coming from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I am currently in-transition and therefore without a system of any kind, but when I was set up I had a pair of Legacy Focus actively triamplified. Crossover was a Merlin ISP100 (great-granddaddy to the EV DX38) with both analog and digital inputs (according to type of source); amplifiers were ancient but wonderful-sounding GAS Grandson, Threshold SA100, conrad-johnson MV50. Crossover topology was my own design. Based upon the results, I'll never go back to passive. Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Richard Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'm tri-amping modified Khorns, currently with a Behringer analog xover and Crown power with Xtis on MF and HF and XLS on LF. The Xtis are used so that I can delay the horns for time alignment. This setup is working well for me, though in the future I may go to a DSP xover and other amps. Not in any hurry right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Islander Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 I'm running bi-amped JubScalas, with a 24-bit EV Dx38 processor feeding 2 Yamaha MX-D1 stereo power amps, one for the woofers, one for the tweeters. The Dx is the same processor that Roy Delgado uses and recommends with the Jubilee speakers. It's a pro unit with 26 parametric EQs in it, plus several delay units, of which I'm using two to delay the tweeters to time-align them with the much longer woofer horns. The EQs are set per Roy's lab-tested settings and allow updates to be easily done, as well as correcting the speakers' FR to a degree that's not possible with typical passives. The first settings were punched in last March, then in the fall I saved the latest (Sept 2008) settings on a separate program, so it's easy to switch back and forth to compare them. The new settings gave a noticeable improvement in the sound, and the Dx can save up to 30 user programs. Much simpler than swapping passive crossover components. I'm a newby to bi-amping, and I'm seeing benefits, but no drawbacks so far, other than expense and complication. Since the receiver/pre-amp and the power amps have 12V triggers, one button powers all three on and off, so no inconvenience there. I'm really happy with this setup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWL Posted January 8, 2009 Author Share Posted January 8, 2009 currently with a Behringer analog xoverWhat model Behringer x-over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Richard Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 currently with a Behringer analog xoverWhat model Behringer x-over? CX3400 2/3 way stereo, 4 way mono. 24 dB/oct Linkwitz-Riley slopes, phase inverting and mute switches on each output. I like it because it has knobs and I'm messing with different drivers and horns all the time. I can make quick adjustments on the fly and immediately hear the changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWL Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 currently with a Behringer analog xoverWhat model Behringer x-over? CX3400 2/3 way stereo, 4 way mono. 24 dB/oct Linkwitz-Riley slopes, phase inverting and mute switches on each output. I like it because it has knobs and I'm messing with different drivers and horns all the time. I can make quick adjustments on the fly and immediately hear the changes. I'm usng a CX2310. I'm finding that setting the input gains as low as possible (-6 in my case) has given me the least amount of noise and best results overall. I realize that by eliminating this link in the chain would probably yeild a cleaner sound........but being able to make these adjustments is giving me the sound I want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockOn4Klipsch Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 i was passive bi-amping for a while with my onkyo 805. I've since traded and no long bi-amp. I have them bi-wiried now, not sure if there's much difference but I had the wires hooked up already so I figured "why not". So i left them bi-wired with the new setup, sounds better than ever....I think most of it's the new components and not attributed to the bi-wire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clipped and Shorn Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Rane AC23 active crossover is good solution for my homebuilt Altec based 4-way tri-amp speaker system. JBL 2404H tweeter uses a passive. I enjoy the flexibility and instant control over a very wide range of vinyl recordings. Time delay feature allows for further alignment. I also enjoy other two channel systems using single amps with passive Xvr, and also an open baffle full range with simple L-pad for woofer. They all can be enjoyed in their own way. The primary system is the tri-amp with active crossover because I am hooked on the ability to control parameters on impulse as needed. Totally quiet. c&s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.