Jump to content

Crummy Sound on newer TV's?


artto

Recommended Posts

After finishing much of the current remodeling project I purchased several smaller flat screen LCD HDTV, a 19" Samsung, a 19" LG and a 23" LG that also can double as a computer monitor. All of these sets have absolutely TERRIBLE sound. I'm not expecting anything I could remotely call "high fidelity"from these sets but the sound is really bad. What's more interesting is that as the volume level is lowered (which is where I need it most of the time) the sound gets really "buzzy", almost Kazoo-like. I've changed all the audio settingsa number of times and it really doesn't make much difference. Anyone else experiencing this? And what's going on that the sound gets so bad at low volume levels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is, along with the ongoing cheapening for the "good enough for less" crowd, as well as flat panel tv's do not allow for the enclosure to double as space for proper sized speakers and the air space within, used to create a fuller sound.

However, even with my last CRT, while the internal speakers were quite good and even had licenced a BBE circuit, the output line from it was so noisy, it rendered it useless to chain through.

Now on my new Samsung LCD, while they have decent RCA outputs to connect to my pre, it doesn't do variable out, so I can't control the volume with my TV remote and last I checked a remote for the McIntosh C26, will never exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is, along with the ongoing cheapening for the "good enough for less" crowd, as well as flat panel tv's do not allow for the enclosure to double as space for proper sized speakers and the air space within, used to create a fuller sound.

However, even with my last CRT, while the internal speakers were quite good and even had licenced a BBE circuit, the output line from it was so noisy, it rendered it useless to chain through.

My experience too. I had a 27" WEGA Sony that had TERRIFIC sound, and, yes, there was plenty of room in that chassis for fine, fully baffled speakers and good, wide-range amps.

I replaced it with a 32" Hi-Def Bravia Sony, which has a thin flat LCD screen and small VERY shallow cavities at the bottom that can hardly hold more than automotive speakers. The sound was so AWFUL that I couldn't STAND it! I think it was mostly electronics distortion from terrible amplifiers. The baseline distortion level was so high I couldn't turn it down because the distortion made even voices unclear, and I couldn't turn it up because I couldn't stand the lousy, irritating quality.

The only solution I could find: a $990 pair of 13"-high Polk speakers (great sound, good deep bass) which I fastened to the wall next to the TV cabinet, and an Arcam integrated amp which was shallow enough to fit behind the TV.

Fortunately, the Bravia has remote-adjustable volume, so remotes work just fine. HT it ain't (I don't have room for surround speaks), but I'm quite happy with it. The Polks have a nice dark cherry wood, and black grill cloth and black plastic tops, so people don't notice them. They produce full frequency range by hanging only 1" away from the wall, as designed.

Too bad TV manufacturers put such a pathetic emphasis on quality sound. It's market manipulation IMO to force people to buy HT amps and speaks instead of putting all good innards into the TV chassis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just replace the old CRT television in my son's room with a Samsung LCD. Nice picture, weird sound. Sound and picture inputs "get there" via his receiver. Normally the sound is turned off/down and I just have the receiver provide the sound to the K'horns in the room. Well I tried to turn the TV sound up to "mimic" a center channel and it was very strange. There was a time delay and it sounded like I was in an empty football stadium! LOLOL!!! In any event, the volume on the TV was turned back down to "0".... By itself (receiver turned down), it's not too bad for watching his xbox game, etc., but when compared to old time TV speakers it is not, shall we say, up to any standard any more..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, yet another reason for me to hold off buying a new TV. The audio from my old JVC CRT is just fine (for a TV) and so is the sound from the bedroom Sony Vega TV, a flat-screen CRT. In both cases, I run audio from the TV Audio Out to the AV receiver and have no complaints. It's sometimes convenient to be able to just turn on the TV and use its speakers, without having to turn on the sound system.

With the bedroom TV, I only use the receiver when listening to music, or if I'm watching a show with music being performed (or watching a movie, of course), so most listening is with the TV's speakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is, along with the ongoing cheapening for the "good enough for less" crowd, as well as flat panel tv's do not allow for the enclosure to double as space for proper sized speakers and the air space within, used to create a fuller sound.

However, even with my last CRT, while the internal speakers were quite good and even had licenced a BBE circuit, the output line from it was so noisy, it rendered it useless to chain through.

My experience too. I had a 27" WEGA Sony that had TERRIFIC sound, and, yes, there was plenty of room in that chassis for fine, fully baffled speakers and good, wide-range amps.

I replaced it with a 32" Hi-Def Bravia Sony, which has a thin flat LCD screen and small VERY shallow cavities at the bottom that can hardly hold more than automotive speakers. The sound was so AWFUL that I couldn't STAND it! I think it was mostly electronics distortion from terrible amplifiers. The baseline distortion level was so high I couldn't turn it down because the distortion made even voices unclear, and I couldn't turn it up because I couldn't stand the lousy, irritating quality.

The only solution I could find: a $990 pair of 13"-high Polk speakers (great sound, good deep bass) which I fastened to the wall next to the TV cabinet, and an Arcam integrated amp which was shallow enough to fit behind the TV.

Fortunately, the Bravia has remote-adjustable volume, so remotes work just fine. HT it ain't (I don't have room for surround speaks), but I'm quite happy with it. The Polks have a nice dark cherry wood, and black grill cloth and black plastic tops, so people don't notice them. They produce full frequency range by hanging only 1" away from the wall, as designed.

Too bad TV manufacturers put such a pathetic emphasis on quality sound. It's market manipulation IMO to force people to buy HT amps and speaks instead of putting all good innards into the TV chassis.

"The baseline distortion level was so high I
couldn't turn it down because the distortion made even voices unclear,
and I couldn't turn it up because I couldn't stand the lousy,
irritating quality."

I
think you hit it right on the head Larry. In particular, voice is
extremely bad especially at low volume. I'm not positive, but I think
this is probably a fine example of amplifiers that have "lower
distortion" at higher levels, something we all know works real well on
the test bench but has no bearing on reality.

And since my
remodeling included new hardwood floors, the rooms are much more
reverberent making this all the more irritating. Considering these sets
are simply for office desks and kitchen there is no need to turn up the
volume just so it doesn't sound so terrible.

"Too bad TV manufacturers put such a pathetic
emphasis on quality sound. It's market manipulation IMO to force
people to buy HT amps and speaks instead of putting all good
innards into the TV chassis."

Excellent point that I hadn't thought of. Unfortunately you're probably right-on about this one too.

As
a side note, the Samsungs went back & exchanged for LG. I have a
61" Samsung LED DLP set which has a fantastic picture ~ extremely
enjoyable. So I reasoned that I'd go with Samsung on the smaller LCD
sets. No Way. No matter what I did I couldn't get the picture to "look
right", especially with SD signals, HD was OK. It's amazing how one
company can excel at one kind of product at the high-end of the market
but their smaller sets stink, yet they think they can still charge a
premium!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what I did I couldn't get the picture to "look right", especially with SD signals, HD was OK.


That may not be a Samsung problem, but an HD TV problem. Most people with HD TVs, no matter which brand, find the picture is terrible on non-HD channels. That's one of the other reasons I haven't bought an HD unit yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what I did I couldn't get the picture to "look right", especially with SD signals, HD was OK.


That may not be a Samsung problem, but an HD TV problem. Most people with HD TVs, no matter which brand, find the picture is terrible on non-HD channels. That's one of the other reasons I haven't bought an HD unit yet.

I generally agree with your assessment but I don't have this problem on the 61", maybe partially due to the cable set top box upsampling the video to 720i or 1080i. But even before the digital cable box was installed, the SD pictures never looked as bad as on the 61" as on the 19" & 22" Samsungs. You would think the smaller sets would produce a sharper picture at the same (supposed) resolution but it didn't. The SD picture, especially on facial/skin tones looked very "flat", like it was composed of only 3 or 4 color tones, no shadows, that kind of thing, almost like a bad "paint by number" painting. The LG aren't quite as bad (and less expensive). Keep in mind my smaller sets are simply hooked up directly to cable, no set top box, so the only HD channels are those that are normally broadcast over-the-air.

With the set top cable box and digital HD service (Comcast) on the large Samsung the picture is absolutely fantastic. IMO anyone who purchases an HDTV really needs to consider also upgrading to HD cable or satellite. Without that they're not going to utilize much of what they paid for in that HDTV. For me, these little sets, like the one in my office, are primarily used for business news (CNBC, Bloomberg) during the day, niether of which are in HD here anyway, which is why this became an issue for me.

The sound however is something else. I don't think I ever even had transistor radio when I was a kid that sounded this lousy, especially at low volume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pah, you call this a problem? I bought a 42 inch LG with the catchy title 42LG5000. Supposedly - according to the reviews this has great sound from invisible speakers. According to me - the speakers are invisible - correct - the sound is dreadful - and I mean diabolically bad.

Worse - there are no analogue audio outputs on the TV - just a digital out (optical). Funnily enough my tube amp doesn't have an optical in - so that is as much use to me as a gold plated tuba.

With a hell of a lot of cabling and some rather clever tricks I can now get the output from all my sources (and there are a lot of them) out to the stereo - but sometimes there is a slight pause as I try to remember how the hell I get the sound from a given source.

Needless to say my old 32 nich Sony had both great sound from its attached speakers (which could also stand alone if required) and an analogue audio out.

To be fair - the new TV does have an astounding picture on HD sources - but god knows why they even bother pretending it offers sound. It also has about 6 sound settings - bad, worse, attrocious, drunk under water, after the explosion and even deaf people complain - but they use other names - like cinema, clear voice and such like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max, that's hilarious!

It would be interesting to see what percentage of people actually listen to audio through their TV. Personally I haven't listened to any kind of audio through my last two TVs and it is the absolute last thing I consider when buying one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Are they trying to simulate the distorted standard computer or MP3 sound? "Ears will become habituated to inaccurate sound," PWK
  • This is just another sign of the arrogant contempt that too many manufacturers have for the consumer.
  • We will be getting a digital flat screen for our bedroom, and it had BETTER have good clean stereo analog outs! Right now, we are using Klipsch promedia with carefully padded down T35 (AKA K-77) tweeters, and they sound amazingly good, believe it or not. Either the TV program material is better than in the past, or we just haven't had halfway decent speakers and poweramps on a TV in a long, long time. Actually, when I was in high school and the first year of college (c1960) we had an RCA table top set (mono) playing through a JBL D130/o75 combo in a Karlson horn loaded enclosure, and I had wired in a Centralab continuously variable loudness control, with switches that gave one a choice between flat treble, or a maximum 8 or 12 dB boost up there -- I could make nearly any TV program or movie sound pretty good with that thing and all those choices. Can anyone recommend a smallish HDTV flatscreen with L and R RCA audio outs, so we can bypass the probably distorted TV power amp stages?
  • Max, I have a garage full of languishing gold plated tubas (McIntosh, Dyna, Luxman, Crown, EV)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sometimes there is a slight pause as I try to remember how the hell I get the sound from a given source.

Needless to say my old 32 nich Sony had both great sound from its attached speakers (which could also stand alone if required) and an analogue audio out.

To be fair - the new TV does have an astounding picture on HD sources - but god knows why they even bother pretending it offers sound. It also has about 6 sound settings - bad, worse, attrocious, drunk under water, after the explosion and even deaf people complain - but they use other names - like cinema, clear voice and such like.


Excellent descriptions, Max! Easy to imagine and fairly creative.

As for selecting your sources, is your system complex enough that it would make sense for you to print up a signal flow chart and leave it on top of your electronics stack?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure a flow chart would help either my wife or my daughter particularly.

Lets see:

  1. There are the new digital tranmitted channels that the TV picks up on its own.
  2. There are the normal terrestrial channels (for a while anyway) that are also dealt with directly by the TV - both coming from the antenna on the roof - wife and daughter manage these fine.
  3. There are the channels that come from out interent provider via the ADSL line through a separate reviever connected via Euroscart to the TV.
  4. There is the Wii box connected to the TV via RCA's - composite and left and right.
  5. There is the DVD player connected to the TV via Component plus left right audio.
  6. There is the WD HD box connected to the TV via the HDMI cable and separately connected to the stereo for left right audio.
  7. Connected tot he WD HD box are 2 hard disk drives - both 500 GB. One is powered and the other takes its power from the USB port itself. The powered one is used for archiving mainly whilst the other is portable so that I can copy content from the computer as the need arises. Actually the other drive can also be connected to the computer via USB by simply plugging it in to the 10 meter long cable I installed for the process.
  8. There is the video recorder connected 2 way via a Euroscart connector. The video audio output is connected to the stereo - allowing anything playing on the TV to come through on the stereo except for digital inputs which the TV refuses to decode for some reason.
  9. Connected to the third input on the VCR is the CD player (as I have run out of connections on the pre-amp and accompanying extension box).
  10. There is the Computer directly connected to the TV (setup as a second screen - an extension of the first screen) via VGA at 1680 (?) by 1076 which is enough for 720p but not 1080p that has to come via the WD HD box. The sound output from the computer goes to the externsion box on the pre-amp so the TV cannot play the sound from the computer - it has to come from the stereo, uniquely.
  11. In parallel the antenna is also connected to the radio (1970's panasonic unit with great sound) via a signal booster (the TV signal also passes through this) and that is connected to one of the inputs on the pre-amp extension box).
  12. Directly connected to the pre-amp is the TT - via the external phono-amp.

Of course things are not really as simple as they appear above.

The computer is networked with my wife's computer (a netbook) and an Ubuntu server. Content can be on any of the hard disks on the network (of which there are 5) - although actually most content exists in 2 locations on the network for security.

Then there are the rules:

  1. Digital music on CD is played from the Marrantz CD player as it sounds so much better than the Pioneer all in one DVD.
  2. All other forms of digital on disk (SACD, DVD, DVDa etc.) are played on the Pioneer.
  3. Digital music (soft) comes from the network and from the WD box unless it is loseless WMA in which case the WD doesn't support it. FLAC and MP3 can come from anywhere but only if using the VLC player - the Windows media player doesn't support FLAC.
  4. Digital video in HD form @ 1080p comes only from the WD.
  5. Digital video in HD from @ 720p can come from either the WD or the computers if the sound-track is not DTS which the WD cannot translate to its analogue outputs.

Actually there is a bit more desides - like the connections for my wife's phone, my phone and my daughter's MP3/4 player but I doubt anyone has followed me this far.

Isn't everyone's system like this by now? I just counted the power connections behind the TV - so not including the Computers - 18 items plugged in!

I am not even sure I can account for them all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...