jason str Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Claude brought up the F-20 before i mentioned the subject in post #64, i did not bring it up. Yes, Claude brought up the F-20 first. I was referring to your "knockoff" statement. I think Claude has some valid points. Why clutter up the "What is more accurate hornes or cones" thread with this. I am entitled to my opinion am i not ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CECAA850 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 We can close the subject if you like. I was finished then. Yes, as far as I know we're each entitled to our own opinion. I'll offer to close the subject again with apologies to the OP for the thread crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeJ1 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 (edited) Well since bass horns must use cones as drivers.............it's still relevant because we are talking horns. The F-20 is longer and has more cubic feet, so they are not the same low cutoff or efficiency. Either the THT or F-20 provide lower distrortion and more powerful sub bass at higher efficiency than the save driver in a ported box. It's just more lumber and worth it. Edited July 29, 2014 by ClaudeJ1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeJ1 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 On 7/28/2014 at 11:41 AM, ClaudeJ1 said: That is what I would build if I could afford the drivers. I created a flat pack of a modeled "slim" version of the refolded Gjallarhorn. I bought the drivers at a close out sale at PE. The will be done and measured this year. Sims tell me they will go down to 13 Hz. in my room. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the real Duke Spinner Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Horns always ..... lower excursion, = less distortion 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeJ1 Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 On 3/13/2023 at 11:41 AM, the real Duke Spinner said: Horns always ..... lower excursion, = less distortion The simplest, most direct form of a universal audio truth ignored by most mainstream consumers. Bose anyone? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OO1 Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 Hybrids.......Bass reflex LF + HF horns , welcome to 90% ++++++ of klipsch sales 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the real Duke Spinner Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 12 hours ago, ClaudeJ1 said: The simplest, most direct form of a universal audio truth ignored by most mainstream consumers. Bose anyone? BOSE. . Buy Other Sound Equipment. 😀😀 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the real Duke Spinner Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 12 hours ago, ClaudeJ1 said: The simplest, most direct form of a universal audio truth ignored by most mainstream consumers. Bose anyone? Exactly. 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babadono Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 On 3/10/2023 at 7:14 AM, ClaudeJ1 said: I created a flat pack Will you make these available to others(me)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeJ1 Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 On 7/29/2014 at 2:44 PM, jason str said: The THT was designed around the Adire Tempest 15 but the driver has been discontinued. The Dayton RSS390 is a much better driver anyways. I'be using two of those in my BT-7 horn to replace the NOT maintenance free servo drive (belts). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.