Jump to content

Best woofer for Belle


Stevenarrow

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

MG,

 

A friend has them and I tested them  a while back and the only number on the was 11-15-046.  Here the specs I got using WT2.  Thanks.

 

 


Buffer[1] Vas                                                       Ver 7.01     

Completed: Sun Nov 09 21:57:31 2014

Drive level 69.504% [2.465 mA]

Sine,LoZP(LV/LA)->Vas,21 pts

;------------------------------------------------------------------

Re         =      4.9895 ohms

Fs         =     30.0773 Hz

Zmax       =    114.3375 ohms

Qes        =      0.3160

Qms        =      6.9247

Qts        =      0.3022

Le         =      3.6119 mH  (at 1 kHz)

Diam       =    336.5500 mm  ( 13.2500 in  )

Sd         =  88958.8296 mm^2(137.8865 in^2)

Vas        =    289.3886 L   ( 10.2197 ft^3)

BL         =     18.0167 N/A

Mms        =    108.7740 g

Cms        =    257.4179 uM/N

Kms        =   3884.7336 N/M

Rms        =      2.9685 R mechanical

Efficiency =      2.3415 % 

Sensitivity=     95.7130 dB @1W/1m

Sensitivity=     97.7634 dB @2.83Vrms/1m

Krm        =   8.289E-03 ohms     Freq dependent resistance

Erm        = 808.551E-03          Rem=Krm*(2*pi*f)^Erm

Kxm        =  63.176E-03 Henries  Freq dependent reactance 

Exm        = 677.122E-03          Xem=Kxm*(2*pi*f)^Exm

;------------------------------------------------------------------

Ftest                   =    21.975 Hz

Ftest/Fms               =    0.7306

Test Mass used          =   95.0000 g (Equal to 19.0 nickels)

Test Mass (Ft=Fms*0.90) =    25.515 g (Add -69.485g for Ft=27.070)

Test Mass (Ft=Fms*0.75) =    84.602 g (Add -10.398g for Ft=22.558)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my cell phone. Here are the t/s specs for the round magnet K-33. Perhaps you can compare these to your results. At first blush it looks like your driver would be OK. You need to consider how the crossover point will be influenced by the greater impedance.

https://imgur.com/pOwb57S

 

here are the K-33 square magnet specs https://imgur.com/jNN8AER

 

hete are the K-43 specs (found in pro LS) https://imgur.com/ZE5vPuy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2016 at 3:45 PM, longdrive03 said:

I ran the K-33 through the WT2 and got the attached results.  Looks like impedance at 400 hz is 5-6 ohms.  

K-33 15192 Klipsch 15 inch woofer

K-33 15192 Klipsch 15 inch woofer IMPEDANCE GRAPH

Without an extension, it's hard to open a file. I figure the file is a woofer tester file. The top part has text, but doesn't match the specs in the photo you uploaded. Based on the picture, here is a comparison of your Eminence and the two different K-33's and K-43.

 

t5bX54I.png

8TjS1mJ.png

oPf36ol.png

mmwklMV.png

 

Hope this helps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No self effacing allowed here. :) Compliments generously accepted even though not deserved. I am an utter amateur at this. What I know is because I have either learned it here or been inspired to go out and learn it from here. The true Sifu's are lurking and hopefully will be kind when they critique my response. 

 

First, your woofer is measuring 3.385Ω not 4.9. There will be little or no effect on the crossover as compared to the designated driver.

 

Second, the woofer you have seems very comparable in a 2cuft enclosure.

 

  • 1st graph: Although it is -2db from the round magnet K-33, it is still better than the square magnet version. 
  • 2nd graph: based on the resonance of the 2cuft enclosure, the woofer acts about the same as and the pro K-43 woofer. Still in the middle of all the compared woofers approved for the LaScala. I don't know what the actual internal volume of the Bell Klipsch is, but the La Scala is 2.04 cu ft.
  • 3rd graph: tells me the driver is more LF capable that all but the square magnet K-33. It is still in the middle of the 4 drivers compared.
  • 4th graph: The timing of the woofer will be as good as the other drivers. The delays are the same.

In my opinion, that woofer would work very well in a La Scala. If the Belle Klipsch has an enclosure with the same volume, it should work in it just as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2014 at 10:23 AM, ClaudeJ1 said:

Everything is a compromise in engineering. I'ts 4 ohm impedance is desirable for Klipsch mid/treble horn sections because the woofer section needs to draw more power from the amp to keep up with the horns on all Klipsch products.

 

 

That's not exactly untrue, but a little skewed.  A 4 ohm woofer places the woofer's impedance closer to the 8 ohm industry standard. 

 

The bass horn loads the cone so that the woofer's impedance is 6+ ohms in a La Scala and Belle (and something similar in the K-horn), pretty close to the nominal 8 ohms of any speaker.  Horn loading raises the efficiency to the 104 dB level.  And, the autoformer increases the impedance of the 107 dB squawker to attenuate its output to line up with the woofer.  The K-77s of the last 40 or more years have an impedance of 7.5-ish ohms and an output of 105 dB, pretty well in line with the other drivers. 

 

Pedantic?  Well,  ........  yeah. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...