Jump to content

Any chance this might be an interesting LaScala mod?


Recommended Posts

I've recently reintroduced my 80s LaScalas into our living room and, much to my satisfaction, managed to make the wife love them as well, though that is a different thread altogether... They've replaced the Forté I which had been our system's mainstay for the last 5 years.

 

I feel as though they're finally setup up properly, better than ever to be honest. Now I'd like to get my system to dig a little deeper, at least as deep as the Forté. It's a dedicated 2 channel music system, so no need for an asburd amount of subbass. Sor far, I'm leaning towards the bass bin mod, which I've followed on and off since it first appeared on this forum. I know, Claude, that I should try the Quarterpies, but I don't want my wife hating these after all my hard work intergrating them into the decor... one day surely.

 

This got my thinking of the Forté and their passive woofers. Would it be interesting to mount a passive woofer on the doghouse access panel, and have it downfiring? This would clearly mean puting some sort of higher feet on the LaScala. I wouldn't even know where to begin, as far as measuring the pressure and the size and weight of the passive subs, any thoughts or contributions? I'm willing to try it out if I can find a proper passive. Just saying.

dna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess this answers my question:

 

"The PR should never be down-firing, the high Mms will cause the diaphragm to be displaced downward immediately. The spiders will eventually be stretched permanently by this treatment, and the unit will need to be rebuilt."
(from www.aespeakers.com/PRFAQ.php ).
 
Ok then, the next question could be: rather than port the modded bass bin with 4" ports, could a backward facing passive radiator, something like the Forté, work? Maybe two small ones The above website has alot of info about choosing the proper PR, though like I said, I don't know a QTS from a Xmax.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not do the obvious, and just add a sub (or two)?

 

I don't know your budget or your WAF, but the DIY 18" subs seem very popular these days.  I think many LS owners here could give you some guidance.  Mustang Guy (directly upstream) has experience with traditional direct radiating subs and he has DIY horn loaded subs (Table Tuba) he alternates with his 6 La Scala setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not do the obvious, and just add a sub (or two)?

 

I don't know your budget or your WAF, but the DIY 18" subs seem very popular these days.  I think many LS owners here could give you some guidance.  Mustang Guy (directly upstream) has experience with traditional direct radiating subs and he has DIY horn loaded subs (Table Tuba) he alternates with his 6 La Scala setup.

 

Actually, this was my original plan. I was eyeing out the Bil Fitzmaurice 18" subs. For now though, it'll likely be the traditional bass bin mod until budget and WAF allow a couple of subs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I guess this answers my question:

 

"The PR should never be down-firing, the high Mms will cause the diaphragm to be displaced downward immediately. The spiders will eventually be stretched permanently by this treatment, and the unit will need to be rebuilt."
(from www.aespeakers.com/PRFAQ.php ).
 
Ok then, the next question could be: rather than port the modded bass bin with 4" ports, could a backward facing passive radiator, something like the Forté, work? Maybe two small ones The above website has alot of info about choosing the proper PR, though like I said, I don't know a QTS from a Xmax.

 

This is what I said, however, there is not a back, there are two fronts in a LaScala.

 

The K-33 woofer is facing the back of the cabinet into a flared horn. If you put your radiators in the front of the LaScala, they would be vertical, they may or may not provide added bass as in tapped horn, and they would look like giant nostrils. Who wouldn't want that?

Edited by mustang guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Build a tuba table. It matches the La Scala sound perfectly and you don't have to cut holes in your speakers. That was the original purpose of mine and you couldn't hear where one transistioned to the other. Just good horn bass down to the upper 20 HZ range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Build a tuba table. It matches the La Scala sound perfectly and you don't have to cut holes in your speakers. That was the original purpose of mine and you couldn't hear where one transistioned to the other. Just good horn bass down to the upper 20 HZ range.

 

So a single tuba table can suffice and mates well with the LaScalas, eh? I'm using a Scott 299b which has been totally reworked by Craig at NOSvalves, so how would I hook the sub up to the amp? It's got a center channel out, would that work? How difficult is the build, and how much can I expect it to cost?

 

Thanks in advance!

dna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Build a tuba table. It matches the La Scala sound perfectly and you don't have to cut holes in your speakers. That was the original purpose of mine and you couldn't hear where one transistioned to the other. Just good horn bass down to the upper 20 HZ range.

So a single tuba table can suffice and mates well with the LaScalas, eh? I'm using a Scott 299b which has been totally reworked by Craig at NOSvalves, so how would I hook the sub up to the amp? It's got a center channel out, would that work? How difficult is the build, and how much can I expect it to cost?

Thanks in advance!

dna

How easy to build is totally based on your skill set going into it. Google tuba table and you will find lots of info on it. You can easily get the materials including amp for $400 or less. The center out on your amp will be perfect for it, sub amps have built in crossovers. There are also other horn sub designs as well, I just mentioned the tuba table because of its relatively compact size and higher WAF when finished nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can build a Table Tuba for $400 including amp, that sounds like the deal of the century, especially for your Scala's.  I paid $300 for my Klipsch RW-12d and I think almost anybody here would tell you the TT would tromp my RW 12d, then chew it up and spit it out.

 

The point to me is that you are already going to have a fixed cost for two passive speaker drivers ($200?) and more money and effort making the mods to the LS.  Why not add a couple hundred more and have a big sound to match your LS's.

 

It's hard to describe the sound if you haven't heard it (which is what everyone else told me :rolleyes: ).  I don't know if you've ever been up close and personal with a real tuba, but within about 10 feet they resonate your chest cavity.  The TT can make the difference between hearing a simple note that sounds like a tuba, and actually having the visceral effect of having the tuba in the room.

 

I've heard LS's at Mustang Guy's Speaker Ranch with the TT TUBA HOME THEATER (thanks Tromprof) and the sound is beyond great.  The horn driven Tuba Home Theater (the two light colored boxes on the right) has a sound that matches the intensity of the LS's (two in black on the left side).  Edit:  (See Tromprof's note directly downstream for the explanation of my goof)

 

post-58280-0-76640000-1427573960_thumb.j

Edited by wvu80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above picture is a "tuba home theater," not a tuba table. The THT is the tuba table's big brother and goes lower and is bigger. Great sub but I don't want the OP scared by the size. The tuba table is a goof chunk smaller and can be made to look like .... a table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above picture is a "tuba home theater," not a tuba table. The THT is the tuba table's big brother and goes lower and is bigger. Great sub but I don't want the OP scared by the size.

 

The tuba table is a good chunk smaller and can be made to look like .... a table.

 

Logical statement sounds logical!

 

Sorry about my goof.  :wacko:  Thanks for the clarification.  :emotion-21:

 

"He who corrects my error giveth me a gold coin."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above picture is a "tuba home theater," not a tuba table. The THT is the tuba table's big brother and goes lower and is bigger. Great sub but I don't want the OP scared by the size. The tuba table is a goof chunk smaller and can be made to look like .... a table.

 

Yeah, I noticed the above subs were huge, they made the Lascalas look reasonably sized. The table is something like 30" x 30"x 16", so it could look good in my living room.

 

In Jim Smith's great "How to Get Better Sound" book, he recommends only ever using stereo subs for a music only system. He claims that, even if subs are indeed omnidirectional, a single sub somehow ruins accoustic recordings. What is the concensus around here as far as stereo vs. mono subs for music?

 

I suppose I could start with one, then when I can afford a second one, build it and place the Lascalas on top, thereby raising them. The 30"x30" footprint should be acceptable as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Build a tuba table. It matches the La Scala sound perfectly and you don't have to cut holes in your speakers. That was the original purpose of mine and you couldn't hear where one transistioned to the other. Just good horn bass down to the upper 20 HZ range.

 

So a single tuba table can suffice and mates well with the LaScalas, eh? I'm using a Scott 299b which has been totally reworked by Craig at NOSvalves, so how would I hook the sub up to the amp? It's got a center channel out, would that work? How difficult is the build, and how much can I expect it to cost?

 

Thanks in advance!

dna

 

 

The derived center channel of the 299b would do the trick to the single sub amp which I did successfully for a year or so.  I personally agree with Jim Smith about two subs.  I would go as far to say that I'd rather have NO sub than just one.  I think there are more than a few here that wouldn't agree with that but maybe it works better for them in their rooms than it does in mine.  That said... there is nothing wrong with starting with a single and building a 2nd later.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The derived center channel of the 299b would do the trick to the single sub amp which I did successfully for a year or so. I personally agree with Jim Smith about two subs. I would go as far to say that I'd rather have NO sub than just one. I think there are more than a few here that wouldn't agree with that but maybe it works better for them in their rooms than it does in mine.

 

 

Is he talking about two MONO subs, or two subs running off the stereo channels?  I presume two mono subs.

 

That said... there is nothing wrong with starting with a single and building a 2nd later.

 

 

And, I agree with you about building a single sub first.  I have a single, and no complaints, even though I know "the book" says to run 2, 3, or 4.

Edited by wvu80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...