Jump to content

Hesitant On New X-Overs....


SWL

Recommended Posts

Speakers (KLF-30's) are fifteen years old and quite frankly, I'm preferring them with solid state instead of tubes lately. Don't get me wrong, they sound great with tubes but just a little too 'relaxed' compared to the qualities that solid state throws out there.

 

I'm wondering if this is due to the age of the speakers and they are ready for a x-over refresh...but at the same time it seems that I'm always reading comments from people who refresh/upgrade their x-overs and then complain that they sound harsh/bright. It seems that a x-over refresh (a lot of times) puts the Klipsch speaker back to square one like when it was new......and bright....and forward....and harsh sounding. Then a certain amount of time later, the listener reports that it mellowed out a bit.

 

Did it mellow out or did the listener just get used to the 'new' sound? Maybe he found a more compatible amp/preamp? Some guys are throwing deadening material all over the cabinet/horns then say it's better. Is it really....or is it just another DIY placebo effect?

 

These are some reasons I'm hesitating on new x-overs. I feel I may be missing out on some detail but I sure as hell don't want to go back to another harsh, bright, forward sounding speaker.

 

Opinions and some insight on this much appreciated. Just had most of my vintage solid state restored and I'm very impressed. Speakers are next in line.

 

 

Thanks,

-Scott

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't go wrong updating you crossover capacitors, your ears just get used to the sound as they age so you think it sounds OK.

 

Are your crossovers bad ? Maybe, probably a little out of specification after 15 years but its only a guess.

 

First thing i notice when installing new capacitors is the improvement in imaging that was missing with the old parts.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't yet upgraded my Quartet crossovers, and those are ~25 years old.  I'm sure they would sound a bit better with an upgrade, but I haven't had the time/money just yet.  I can say that I have a set of Heresy III - so they have fresh crossovers/drivers.  I do not find the Heresy III harsh at all.  Brighter than the quartets? Sure, but not in a bad way - all the instruments are just there. I have heard the La Scala II, so again all new components, and those were not harsh at all - In fact, my ~37 year old completely stock Altec 19 are brighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't go wrong updating you crossover capacitors, your ears just get used to the sound as they age so you think it sounds OK.

 

First thing i notice when installing new capacitors is the improvement in imaging that was missing with the old parts.

Good point. The common denominator here is that people always criticize Klipsch as sounding bright, harsh and forward sounding....especially when they're new.... myself included. I suppose my concern is that I don't want to be limited to using tubes to remedy this.

 

My imaging and soundstage is awesome at this point.

Edited by SWL
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother owns my old pair of 30's and he's quite happy with them. I brought him over a pair of Chorus 1's to trade awhile back thinking they would be a nice "upgrade" for him. Well, the Chorus sounded extremely bright in comparison, unbearably bright in fact. In their defense his room is all wood panel ceiling and hardwood floors. What surprised me was how the 30's weren't bright sounding at all. I concluded that his crossovers were probably in need of repair and he just said that if they were broken, they were broken just right. I really couldn't disagree as they sound pretty good. I ended up just taking the Chorus back home with me.

Edited by jjptkd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't yet upgraded my Quartet crossovers, and those are ~25 years old.  I'm sure they would sound a bit better with an upgrade, but I haven't had the time/money just yet.  I can say that I have a set of Heresy III - so they have fresh crossovers/drivers.  I do not find the Heresy III harsh at all.  Brighter than the quartets? Sure, but not in a bad way - all the instruments are just there. I have heard the La Scala II, so again all new components, and those were not harsh at all - In fact, my ~37 year old completely stock Altec 19 are brighter.

Have you done the "ground lug mod" on your M19's? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't yet upgraded my Quartet crossovers, and those are ~25 years old. I'm sure they would sound a bit better with an upgrade, but I haven't had the time/money just yet. I can say that I have a set of Heresy III - so they have fresh crossovers/drivers. I do not find the Heresy III harsh at all. Brighter than the quartets? Sure, but not in a bad way - all the instruments are just there. I have heard the La Scala II, so again all new components, and those were not harsh at all - In fact, my ~37 year old completely stock Altec 19 are brighter.

Have you done the "ground lug mod" on your M19's?

Nope, completely stock and sound great.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hesitant to upgrade the crossovers on my Fortes (made in 1986), but when I did, I was blown away by the improvement.  The sound became more open, pleasant, cohesive, with less distortion and fatigue.  I think the new crossovers made my speakers smoother instead of harsher.  I used Bob Crites crossovers btw.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original capacitors are Mylars/polyester. The internal resistance or ESR is higher than what is being used to replace them, which are typically polypropylenes. The new capacitors make the loudspeaker sound brighter in comparison to the old Mylars, which actually didn't measure that great to begin with. The polypropylenes are cleaner sounding, and the great majority consider it an acceptable trade off -- a bit of additional brightness to get the cleaner sound. For whatever reason, some interpret this additional brightness as "harshness". I put this down to break-in, which no one here believes in.

I try to use capacitors that kind of fall in between, and I like the Dayton Audio brand of capacitors. I also recommend Mills resistors. Good film and foils are even smoother, but I don't recommend doing that unless you have a lot of experience -- the parts are much bigger and they fight you all the way. I also just did some Chorus IIs using the films, and the customer was not happy with the results. Though a first, it's still a valid demonstration of how subjective this stuff is. Because of that experience, I've decided to start sourcing polyester capacitors and giving people a choice.

You need to do something. They're getting along in years and need some love.

If they were mine, and I knew that I was keeping them for the rest of my life - I would rebuild both networks using paper in oil capacitors and wax impregnated autoformers and coils.

I'm not taking on anymore work right now, but we're talking easy builds here - so don't be afraid to tackle the project if you can afford it.

Edited by Deang
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just add a very small amount of series resistance w/ the polypropylene caps to retain the original roll off characteristics? Personally I replaced what I thought were polyester caps that were in my Heresy II's w/ polypropylene and didn't notice any harshness or brightness, I have very good hearing in the upper octaves fwiw.

Edited by xxJPMxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've never had the x-overs out before.....much-less ever really looked at them. Any tips or things I should be aware of when changing out the old and putting the new ones?

 

Bob made it sound like it's pretty self explanatory once I dig in.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never had the x-overs out before.....much-less ever really looked at them. Any tips or things I should be aware of when changing out the old and putting the new ones?

 

Bob made it sound like it's pretty self explanatory once I dig in.

 

 

Thanks.

well guess my post was too late lol. if you are having pre built ones shipped to you, then it is easy. get access to them unscrew the terminals the hold the wires on. take out crossover. put in new one. nothing to be afraid of at all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original capacitors are Mylars/polyester. The internal resistance or ESR is higher than what is being used to replace them, which are typically polypropylenes. The new capacitors make the loudspeaker sound brighter in comparison to the old Mylars, which actually didn't measure that great to begin with. The polypropylenes are cleaner sounding, and the great majority consider it an acceptable trade off -- a bit of additional brightness to get the cleaner sound. For whatever reason, some interpret this additional brightness as "harshness". I put this down to break-in, which no one here believes in.

 

Do you ever have to measure actual values on capacitors?  I had to build a capacitor tester from scratch in engineering school, still have it, have yet to discover a real world use for it.  

 

Also are you saying the capacitor itself needs to go through a break-in stage?  

Edited by MetropolisLakeOutfitters
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Capacitors are a little cranky and the sound will settle down between 10 and 20 hours of listening. Some say it's just the ear/brain "getting used to the new sound" - I don't buy into that. I've spoken to several in the industry, including Richard Marsh, and ALL agree that there is a short settling in period.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deano,

 

You wrote, 

 

For whatever reason, some interpret this additional brightness as "harshness". I put this down to break-in, which no one here believes in.

Capacitors are a little cranky and the sound will settle down between 10 and 20 hours of listening. Some say it's just the ear/brain "getting used to the new sound" - I don't buy into that. I've spoken to several in the industry, including Richard Marsh, and ALL agree that there is a short settling in period.

 

Don't you find it strange that after the process of "breaking in" components e.g. speaker wire, interconnects, capacitors, etc., that the "sound" is always better, not worse? Surely one capacitor out of the thousands that are broken in using Deano's 10-20 hour window would change the sound for the worse. And what's to keep the component from changing back to its factory-fresh characteristics after a break in period? 

 

If I am purchasing capacitors that cost $20-40 each, I want a component that is stable, not one that needs breaking in, curing, aging or whatever the prevailing subjectivist BS jargon is this week.

 

Click on the link to read a classic two-part paper co-authored by Richard Marsh and Walt Jung on picking capacitors. Pretty ground-breaking stuff when it was written for audio magazine in 1980. There is also an article by John Curl on real-time testing of capacitors.

 

http://www.waltjung.org/PDFs/Walt%27s_Blog_2014_Classic_Articles_Page.pdf

 

 

 

Lee

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...