Jump to content

Is bi-wiring worth it?


Marios
 Share

Recommended Posts

On ‎12‎/‎1‎/‎2016 at 9:00 AM, wvu80 said:

I have an Onkyo TX NR717.  It has a specific feature via the on-screen display menu where I can set my speakers to bi-amp, so I used two discrete sets of cables (4 cables total) OUT from the AVR for bi-amp.  I have never understood what the 717 is doing, or how it is separating the signal or output power.  I've had lots of people guess, and there is nothing official from Onk.

 

I have seen this on various receivers before and it really is a nice option to have. What it does is allow you to use 4 of your receivers amp channels to drive a single pair of bi-ampable speakers adding additional watts. My Sunfire Receiver does not have that option but what I've done is used 4 channels anyway in bi-amp fashion and just set the processor to "party" mode which runs all selected channels in stereo. It worked as far as adding additional power that was noticeable but it did not allow for any surround modes obviously so it ended up just being an interesting experiment. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

So if I have 100w per channel left has two speaker 50w per speaker if hook two speakers. Right channel same. 
 So if I bi-wire my towers it will give 50w to subs (low) then 50w to tweeters ( highs) the tower dose not have to split signals with circuitry any longer. 
 I personally notice difference not huge but better highs n mids. Worth it 

kinda like jumping up your cartridge one notch on your TT. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Wes said:

So if I have 100w per channel left has two speaker 50w per speaker if hook two speakers. Right channel same. 
 So if I bi-wire my towers it will give 50w to subs (low) then 50w to tweeters ( highs) the tower dose not have to split signals with circuitry any longer. 
 I personally notice difference not huge but better highs n mids. Worth it 

kinda like jumping up your cartridge one notch on your TT. 
 


That method still uses the internal crossover in the speaker.

And it doesn’t split the 100 watts in the way you’re describing either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2022 at 5:31 PM, Wes said:

So if I have 100w per channel left has two speaker 50w per speaker if hook two speakers. Right channel same. 
 So if I bi-wire my towers it will give 50w to subs (low) then 50w to tweeters ( highs) the tower dose not have to split signals with circuitry any longer. 
 I personally notice difference not huge but better highs n mids. Worth it 

kinda like jumping up your cartridge one notch on your TT. 
 

No 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2022 at 2:31 PM, Wes said:

So if I have 100w per channel left has two speaker 50w per speaker if hook two speakers. Right channel same. 
 So if I bi-wire my towers it will give 50w to subs (low) then 50w to tweeters ( highs) the tower dose not have to split signals with circuitry any longer. 
 I personally notice difference not huge but better highs n mids. Worth it 

kinda like jumping up your cartridge one notch on your TT. 
 

It depends on the thickness of the wire.  If you have 100 wpc and use wire that is twice as fat then it will get 66 wpc and the smaller wire will get 33 wpc, the other watt gets lost in friction.  😝

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...