Jump to content

Help me Understand Rated Output Power


Winestone

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Youthman said:

My point was that the more speakers you add to your current receiver, the less power you will have to effectively drive each of them.  In my case, it was a Yamaha RX-V1800.  Looking at the specs....I was incorrect....it is a 130x7 (or so they claimed).  It sounded fantastic driving 5 speakers but after I added surround backs, I noticed I had to crank the receiver up quite a bit more and even increasing the volume, there wasn't the same dynamics that I heard with only the 5 speakers.  It wasn't until someone directed me to Sound and Vision's bench test of that receiver that I found out when you add all 7 speakers, you are no longer getting 130w per channel, but it dropped to merely 55wpc. 

I am curious--Were you using the RX-V1800 with RF-7s up front? The reason I ask is because I've developed a hypothesis after my research that it isn't necessarily the Watts per Channel, but the ability of lower end AVRs to cover the impedance dips of the RF-7s in a multichannel configuration. Without getting into the weeds, I noticed the same thing you described when I was happy with my Yammi RX-V 800 in a smaller room driving a 5.1 system and then moved the AVR to a larger room and it kept shutting down at louder volume...

 

...I then got a Denon AVR-4802R that was THX ultra II rated which advertised it was able to drive (ALL) speakers that dipped down to 3.2 Ohms in a 3,000 sq ft room, which was a major THX Ultra II spec. That was when I found not all AVRs were created equal and that the upper end units had beefier power supplies. I was disheartened when lightening struck and bricked the AVR-4802R and then received a AVR-4806 which also was THX Ultra II rated and loved both of those units....I kept an eye on the AVR-4311ci and was concerned it may not be able to drive my system efficiently but found it also was rated to drive 4 Ohm speakers all of the way around (I also have RB-75s on the side and rear and haven't seen their impedance curve but felt it's "8 Ohm compatible spec could be suspect because of that last word) Fwiw, I have been ecstatic with it and for the last 3 years, as before listen to material quite loud (80+ dB) on pretty much a nightly basis. :) 

 

Btw, here is the link to the Yamaha RX-V1800: http://download.yamaha.com/api/asset/file/?language=en&site=usa.yamaha.com&asset_id=35512 and on page 117 seems to confirm that using speakers that may be closer to 4 Ohm shouldn't be used or at least implied that by not mentioning it. I have also seen other manuals actually express not to use 4 Ohm speakers and those that can seem to use that as a selling point and are more expensive than their counterparts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wvu80 said:

Because I am in experimental mode with the newly upgraded Khorns this morning I played the same high quality 5.1 source material with which I am very familiar starting with 2.1, then 3.1, then 5.1.  I then listened in reverse order from 5.1 back to 2.1

Did you also use an SPL meter to see what volume you were comparing?

20 minutes ago, wvu80 said:

Running from low to high my system sounded really good in 2.1, a little degradation in 3.1, and very smooth in 5.1.  I was listening to dynamic LOUD horns and drums.  Smooth isn't good in that case and the side speakers added little to nothing in terms of audio content.

Hmm. I listen to mostly multichannel music disks and have RB-75s on the sides and rear to match my RF-7/RC-7 front soundstage and I'm never going back to 2 channel. :) That said, if you surrounds aren't as 'matched' to your front K-horns I could see where that could have diminishing results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zen Traveler said:

Did you also use an SPL meter to see what volume you were comparing?

No, I don't have an SPL meter.  My internal SPL meter tells me that as speakers get brighter, they tend to sound better.

 

Quote

Hmm. I listen to mostly multichannel music disks and have RB-75s on the sides and rear to match my RF-7/RC-7 front soundstage and I'm never going back to 2 channel. :) 

Nice setup.  RB-75's as sides and rears?  Outstanding.  Wow! 

 

That said, if you surrounds aren't as 'matched' to your front K-horns I could see where that could have diminishing results.

Good assumption.  The surrounds are Bose 301's and as such are much less efficient than my L/R.  The AVR does a good job of matching my mis-matched speakers, but when I add the 301's it really throws a wet blanket over the front sound.

 

And since you're stirring up trouble...  :P ...

 

I never really thought about this, but I do have another set of horn driven speakers and they are much larger than the Bose, but closer in efficiency and sound to your RB-75's.  In your honor, I may swap them out and see what happens. 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=133746&stc=1

 

I still don't think I will be a fan of side surrounds.  It always freaks me out when sound comes from beside me or behind me.  :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wvu80 said:

Good assumption.  The surrounds are Bose 301's and as such are much less efficient than my L/R.  The AVR does a good job of matching my mis-matched speakers, but when I add the 301's it really throws a wet blanket over the front sound.

 

And since you're stirring up trouble...  :P ...

 

Thanks for responding, but I wasn't trying to stir up trouble--legitimately curious. B) That said, I can also understand not appreciating multichannel music as much having completely tonally different speakers as surrounds (especially with K-horns as mains).

 

1 hour ago, wvu80 said:

I still don't think I will be a fan of side surrounds.  It always freaks me out when sound comes from beside me or behind me.  :wacko:

I have heard this as well. Otoh, it was something I became accustomed to going from concert videos which I didn't like crowd noises in the surrounds as much as well placed vocals and instruments meandering seamlessly through my system. I started off with classic Rock albums that were re-mastered in 5.1 and then on to Steely Dan/Donald Fagen which I wasn't privy too as a kid and then came full circle finding Talking Heads were made for this format! :emotion-21:

 

We started out watching movies, then concerts and now I primarily listen to DVD-As/SACDs with a few concerts mixed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...