Jump to content

Bryston Class AB Amplifiers


Dawson's Ridge

Recommended Posts

BRYSTON 

Bryston has used Class AB output stage architecture for many years because it provides an excellent platform for one of the things we find most important in music reproduction: Linearity. There are numerous ways to implement a high-current output stage for an amplifier meant to drive speakers. There is Class A where all output devices carry signal current at all times; Class B where the individual output devices carry signal current 50% of the time, each on one polarity of the signal; class AB where each polarity of output device carries signal current more than 50%, but less than 100% of the waveform cycle. 

There is also Class D, where the signal is converted to a varying pulse-width square-wave on a supersonic carrier, but that is beyond the scope of these comments. Suffice it to say that this can be a good, accurate way to amplify a signal, but the overall linearity is dependent on the accuracy of the conversion to an HF carrier, modulated square-wave. It also presents challenges with excluding the carrier itself from the final, delivered signal to the speakers. It can represent many hundreds of watts of RF energy, and the necessary filtering has a tendency to affect audio frequencies to some extent. 

Once we have chosen maximum linearity as one of the most important parameters of an output stage, we can look at the characteristics of the power devices to see where they perform best, and where they may have problems. Power transistors have a rather broad linear region in their transfer function, from just above their 'on' threshold, up to the higher current region closer to saturation, or fully 'on'. At very low current near threshold, and at very high current near saturation, the transfer function bends toward an overall 'S' shape. Thus, it becomes obvious that for the best linearity we want to keep the output devices operating within the optimal linear region of their transfer function. We can do that by operating the output transistors as opposite polarity pairs, switching from one polarity to the other at the zero-crossing region. Class B will inevitably show a discontinuity in the zero-crossing region, since as we saw above, the transistors are not linear at those low-Voltage, low current parts of the signal. Placing a known continuous biasing current on the transistors prevents them from entering that nonlinear part of their curve, and smoothes the zero-crossing region. There may still be a small discontinuity in the zero-crossing region if the upper and lower output devices do not have exactly equal and opposite characteristics at the crossover point. Unfortunately, opposite polarity devices have similar, but not exactly equal, characteristics.  

Attempting to overcome the small remaining zero-crossing discontinuity by increasing the bias current to a level that it keeps the output devices 'on' for 100% of the waveform cycle does nothing but push the devices into the nonlinear region at the high-current end of their transfer function. Distortion actually goes up, not down, all else being equivalent.  

Thus, Bryston began exploring the possibility of giving the two polarities of output transistor exactly 'equal and opposite' characteristics. In that way the zero-crossing region can remain linear. The way we found was to incorporate our 'Quad Complementary' output section, discussed in the white paper sent to you by James Tanner earlier. That output configuration goes a long way toward virtually eliminating zero-crossing artifacts from the signal, and sound quality is very improved. 

In the future, it remains to be seen whether Class D can achieve the overall musicality that a correctly designed Class AB amplifier can achieve. It is not there yet, but we feel it holds promise. 

In today's noisy world, there are challenges remaining in terms of an amplifier's immunity to RF and other noise signals coming in on the power-supplies and input cables. Our latest 'Cubed' models have demonstrated that it is quite important to take that into account as well as overall linearity of a test signal. That's also outside of this discussion, of course, but it matters. 

I hope this above is helpful, but please let me know if you have questions or comments.
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The future is now for Class D systems.  I have Acurus Class A/B amp and my SC 99 sounds just as nice.  I use these as much as my tube gear.  Class A, Class A/B, Class D have all been around for some time and great amps exist in all the classes.  As time goes forward, the old 50-100 amp will fall to progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wdecho said:

Run up the bias on a Class A/B and it will sound almost as good as an amplifier being run in Class A. 

 

Oddly, I talked to Mondial/Acurus about that about the time Klipsch bought them and I bought an A250 for my first pair of Larger Subwoofers.  Apparently my A125x5 could be rebiased to operate in Class A to several watts, if the heat sinks were bigger.  I was told there was just not a market for 50 watt/ch HT amps that operated in Class A to 10 watts, except for me.  B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 5/3/2017 at 6:32 AM, Schu said:

Who posts in blue... yikes.

Nice observation :blink:  My observation is it looks like Bryston marketing material vs. a post with marketing left out.

 

I myself had a set of Monarchy Class A amps and brought in a set of Bel Canto Ref 1000s to test.  Bought the Ref 1000s and sold the Monarchy's.  Never looked back.  The Bel Cantos will likely be there til they die.

 

With that, if I lived in NY or NH I probably wouldn't mind a set of Class A amps though I do like to leave my equipment on 24/7 which is not something you typically want to do with Class A amps.

 

Bryston are nice but you do pay for the pleasure of a 20yr warranty which with many, is a nice state of mind.  Many people on the Klipsch forum change hardware like ******wear so not sure :D

 

I do want to look more into the NuPrime IDA 8 type amps that marry Class A+D.  Not sure I want to spend another 1k to play though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Class A/B done right, and there is no need for anything else. Especially an energy hogging cap cooking class A amp. I would much rather have a Class A tube amp. I do agree Class D is the future. It is almost matured in the higher end Ncore amps, but still not quite there IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...