Jump to content

Eight K55V drivers


Recommended Posts

Hi guys.

The picture below is an item up for bids now (March 26, 2001) on eBay:

8-k55v.jpg

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1224869985

I have not been able to confirm it from the seller yet, but I think all

these drivers are the later version of the K55V having the phase plug

modification done by PWK to smooth the frequency response. These can be

identified by solder-on connections rather than push-on connections. If this

is the case it represents 4 sets of drivers for home stereo speakers! The

pictures seem to show solder-on connections, but I can't tell for sure.

The price is probably going to go to high for me to buy it just to get one

set of two. If four of us get together and buy it as a group, we could all

divide the drivers between us (2 each at least).

Would anybody else be interested if I can confirm that they are the later

versiom K55V?

Al K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those ARE the late drivers. I have 2 of those and one of the early K-55-Vs. I can't hear a difference other than the fact that the newest late driver has less output than its twin. I have had the disphragm replaced and found the voice coil was rubbing apparently from abuse.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

You might be right about not being able to hear the difference. PWK himself said virtually the same think in a "Dope from Hope" outlining the phase plug chage. I think it will ultimatly cost less than the K55M.

As to the bigger throat, If you are going to have the same taper and start with a biger throat, you must wind up with a bigger mouth. How am I going to get that into a Belle Klipsch?

Al K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>John Albright Those ARE the late drivers. I have 2 of those and one of the early K-55-Vs. I can't hear a difference other than the fact that the newest late driver has less output than its twin. I have had the disphragm replaced and found the voice coil was rubbing apparently from abuse. << The K55V with solder lugs sounds better than the ones with spring loaded terminals because the connections can't vibrate.The Atlas PDMR, the Atlas model designation for the new phase plug design, both measures and sounds different than the K55V. >>John Warren What the big deal with these drivers??

I've got a pr of them on LaScalas I don't think they sound a any different than the

K55M (they all suck).There is no magic fix here---> you need a midrange with a bigger throat. it physics nothing else, stop fooling yourselves<< We are in total agreement.These drivers are from the MCM1900 which originally used the Gauss HF4000 2" throat midrange driver.My favorite 2" midrange driver for the K/B/LS is the Community Light and Sound M200 ftp://ftp.voicenet.com/communit/specs/new/m200.pdf This driver sounds much better than the current crop of titanium 2" stuff.>>Al Klappenberger As to the bigger throat, If you are going to have the same taper and start with a biger throat, you must wind up with a bigger mouth.<< For the same taper rate if you start out with a bigger throat you end up with the same mouth area and a shorter horn.Done it many times with the K400.See figure 5.11 in Acoustical Engineering by Olson.Shows a 100hz horn with different throat sizes.Absolute best horn reference book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot of stuff I can't hear or can't hear easily in the room I use. However, I have seen the Dope from Hope introducing the solder terminal -V and it's response curves. The latest -V is obviously smoother than the previous one and has better output from 4k - 6k. That's why I went to the trouble to find a second solder-terminal driver. I expected to hear something, but didn't. Maybe if I had 2 of each and swapped both at once, I'd hear it.

Why does Klipsch use such a small throat in the K-400? When I first saw it I thought it looked too small, but I barely understand the physics. Is the small throat a way of getting a horn with a 263 Hz cut-off in the space alotted? If the throat were larger and the length the same (with a small increase in mouth size, perhaps) would the cut-off rise to an unacceptable frequency? Specifically, what does the small throat do to sound (velocity too high?)?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

I am NO horn expert, but as I understand it, a longer horn has it's first discontinuity at a lower frequency. The narrow throat makes the horn longer. A big throat is only necessary for extreme power levels. The big throat means a bigger driver which requires a bigger voice coil and that limits the high frequency end. PWK knew what he was doing!

Al K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al-It's air movement. large diaphragm (large throat) moves less for a given SPL. small diphragms like K55M strains at moderate levels results in air compression instabilitites at throat=distortion. You hear what goes on in the throat in a mid horn because your ear is at max sensitivity in that region.

The Khorn mid cannot reproduce strings or solo piano at moderate SPLs without appreciable distortion. djk recommends to hack a few inches of the Klipsch K400 and mount 2" compresion unit. I've not heard this setup but it is reasonable and in the right direction. an adapter of some type is needed and if you have a plastic horn it might not be feasible.

throwing away the OEM crossovers and replacing with other units isn't a viable fix IMO. Like auto engines, there is no substitute for cubic inches.

PWK has admitted that the mid-range is a tough nut to crack and it is evident in the many variations in the horn over the years.

I don't really know why PWK held on to the K55-series driver for so long, maybe it was some sort of passion but pice gets high when compression drivers get large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compression instability (also termed "air overload distortion"): 2cnd Harmonic distortion caused by the non-linear relationship between pressure and volume of the air in the throat of the horn as it undergoes adiabatic compression and expansion.

Mathematically--

%2nd Harmonic distortion =

<1.73(F/Fc)I>x10^-2

where:

F= driving frequency

Fc = cut-off frequency

I = throat intensity (watts/sq.cm)

So Ed, as you state the speed of sound in air for a given temperature, pressure and humidity is a constant....now that I've explained compression instability can you explain this statment and were it was supposed to take us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

Plugging different values into the formula you provided:

%2nd Harmonic distortion =

<1.73(F/Fc)I>x10^-2

where:

F= driving frequency

Fc = cut-off frequency

I = throat intensity (watts/sq.cm)

seems to indicate that the % 2nd harmonic is going to be very, very low for most of the range of the driver, but I have no idea what the watts/sq.cm value refers to. I mean, the sq.cm is, I assume, the cross sectional area of the horn's throat, but where? At the point just in front of the driver, or at the narrowest point, or somewhere else? Also, what are "watts" ? Acoustic power output? Electric power input to the driver? Am very curious...

Thanks for the informative posts, by the way...

Ray

------------------

Music is art

Audio is engineering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...