Jump to content

folkdeath95

Regulars
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by folkdeath95

  1. I'm thinking about damping the cabinet walls (maybe with Dynamat or bitumen sheets).


    Dynamat
    and materials like that are meant to damp vibrations/resonances in
    metal car body panels. They can also be helpful with metal horns like
    K400s, but wooden panels already have more inherent damping than metal
    panels, so the benefits of applying it would be limited.


    I use the word "Dynamat" as a generic term. I'm not sure I will use this stuff. Bitumen sheets or material used in house buildind to damp walls or wooden doors could be interesting. I have some scrap of Dynamat, I will try it on some plywood board to see how it manage with vibrations.

    Another "cheat" for the H-I is to remove the original 1/2" rear panel and replace it with a 3/4" panel (45 degree router on the edges to bring the edge back to 1/2" thick takes care of the appearance issues...). Another "cheat" is to throw a couple of 3 pound "soft weights" (SCUBA) on the floor of the cabinet, up against the side panels. That'll really stop alot of unwanted resonance, vibrations, etc.....

    Cool

    I already replaced the back panel with a thicker one (19mm plywood). I can feel the difference when I put my hand on it. And I can hear it with a clearer, less draft (I'm not sure of the word) bass sound. A definitely essential mod.

  2. Thanks for your answers.

    Stiffening the walls seems to be a good idea. It must be worth the work. Nevertheless, I think that stiffening a cabinet can move parasitical vibrations to an upper frequencies, so maybe it could be usefull to put Dynamat after the bracing the enclosure.

    second, go grab a bag of the poly-fill sheet from walmart and glue them to the walls. also remember to put a sheet on top of the brace.

    Your idea seems logical, as in a closed enclosure, the rear wave of the speakers has to be totally absorbed (and this how most closed speakers are made). But it seems that lots of people who tried this on their Heresy didn't like the result. So I'm quite hesitant.

    Did you stuff your cabinet with polyfill?

  3. Hello,

    A lot of posts have been written about damping the Heresy's cabinet and it seems that almost everybody consider it as a bad thing. But all those experience were an attempt to damp the load of the woofer.

    I recently read a very interesting article about parasitic vibrations in speakers enclosures and I'm thinking about damping the cabinet walls (maybe with Dynamat or bitumen sheets). I already replaced the back wall with thicker plywood with good results, so I'm wondering if damping the walls could be as good. Does anybody here tried such a mod?

  4. Hi,

    so I received and insalled the 14 g. inductors. I'm sorry to report that I don't share the same enthusiasm as Antones on these. I'm not yielding any more bass output at all. In fact , less. Output is not increased and bass actually sounds leaner. I wanted to like these expensive inductors, but they just don't do it for me. Maybe it's just the combination with my port. After all, this hobby is pretty much about compromises isn't it.

    Stan

    Your experience seems to prove one thing: theory is one thing, pratice is another. Inductor's sound is not just a matter of DCR. Air core inductors are onften prefered even if they have higher DCR.

    Crossover design is an hard thing and requires lots of tests that can somtimes be disappointing. Let's hope you can have a refound and continue your work on your Heresy.

  5. Yes, you can sand your cabinets. When I bought mine, they were painted in green. I first had to scour them before sanding using an orbital sander. I used 80, 120 and 180 sanding paper and I didn't ruin the veneer.

    I also replace the back panel with and thicker one (18mm plywood) with banana plugs. I unglued the original sticker by the back panels over a pan filled with boiling water on my hob. The "cooking"[;)] takes approximately 15 minutes before the stickers started to unglue, then I gently peeled it from the wood.

  6. Has anyone ever calculated the amount of difference we should hear in db from the woofer with and without the DCR of the woofer inductor?

    I think the difference will be very, very small. When I was working on my Heresy, I measured the K22 with and without the crossover (I used a Behringer ECM8000 and the software used was Arta). IIRC, there was no visible differences between the two curves in the low end (before the inductor starts to act as a crossover). I haven't try to zoom on the two curves to see if there was any differences (but I could try when I'm back at home).

    But, theoritically, given that the K22 is less efficient that the other drivers, any small fraction of dB won by diminishing the inductor DCR can be considered as a good thing.

  7. On the simulations with WinISD, the K22 goes to 63Hz at -3dB, the Dayton goes to 60Hz. I don't know how deep goes the Crites, but in a Heresy cab, when trying to keep good efficiency in mind, it's hard to go deep (the best result I had on WinISD was 55Hz at -3dB with a Focal Audiom 12, but the Heresy needed to be trnasformed in a bass-reflex enclosure).

    If just looking the lowest frequency at -3dB, the Dayton could be considered as an improvement, even if I don't believe this 3 little Hz can be considered as an indication of sound quality.

  8. Well, the curves I posted are only simulations made by a software using the Thiele/Small parameters of the drivers. Moreover, the volume of the box is only an approximation. I measured my Heresy to calculate the internal volume and found 54.5L. I wish to consider the volume of the braces, speakers, horns and crossover but I was to lazy to calculate it, so I set the volume at 50L in the software. I don't if this is more or less than the real internal volume of my cabinets.

    My curves are certainly not as accurate as measurements in a anechoid room, but it's a good way to make some comparisons.

  9. Safe, as in load?

    The only safety problem is with the crossover points and shifting down the crossover lower than it should be and toasting a driver. Since the cap on the tweeter is after the autoformer, it should have minimal impact.

    Thanks.[;)]

  10. Since you will be going back to almost stock as far as the crossover for the mids, you may have to swap back out the higher cap for the lower since the impedence will change on the midrange circuit.

    With the swanping resistor, changing the position of the driver on the T2A doesn't affect the impedance seen by the amplifier, so the value of the capacitor can stay nearly the same.

    Going back to stock for the mids may make the mid/high to hot again which would force you to play with the resistor and crossover cap (because of the impedence change).

    With the squawker back to stock position, the midrange is not too bright (to my ears). Only the trebble need to be attenuated. When plugged on tap 2 (with the squawker) it's OK, but I'm not sure it's safe to have two drivers plugged on the same tap (that was my main question).

    Thanks to both of you for your answers.

  11. Not sure about your desired configuration. You said the speaker was too bright. Why don't you try a 39-40 ohm
    resistor parallel with the tweeter and put the midrange back to stock
    position. See what you think, this should smooth things out. Best
    regards Moray James.

    Sorry if I haven't been clear. The midrange is already back to stock position (tap 2) and I'm still trying to attenuate the tweeter. That's why I thought about pluging it on the tap 2 too.

    What will be the goal of the resistor in parallel with the tweeter?

  12. Hello,

    Like many people here, I found my Heresy rather on the "treble side". I discovered on this forum that the Type E crossover could be modified to change this. So I decided to try this mod:

    Type%20E%20Modified.jpg

    The result was a "smoother", more quiet treble, as I expected, but I found that the squawker was attenuated too much. So I thought about pluging the squawker back on tap 2. But, there will be two drivers connected on this tap and I don't know if the T2A can work like this...

    Hence this question: Is it possible to connect two drivers on the same tap of a T2A?

    Thanks.

  13. This inductance in the voice coil acts as built in 1st order crossover. This is true in any voice coil type driver. It is usually equivalent to a 1 mH inductor for large woofers -- though this depends on the driver..

    Your observation may be that the crossover inductor seems too small to work at the crossover freq. The reason, probably, is that the voice coil already has 1 mH worth of inductance.

    WMcD

    I've never heard of that before. From what I read, I thought the voice coil inductance wasn't included in the crossover calculation. On every source, the formula was: L=Z/(2*PI*Fc). From what you say, it should be read as L=(Z/(2*PI*Fc))-Le, right?

  14. I didn't know that. I must confess I only studied the Type E crossover as my Heresy are my first Klipsch speakers. So I didn't point the similarities in crossover components. That's a very interesting information. (It could explain why so many KHorn users tweak their crossovers or the crossover upgrades like Al K's offers..) Maybe a little work on the Type E could give good results too...

  15. Hello,

    Does anybody has ever seen the K22 impedance curve?

    The Type E crossover frequency for the woofer is said to be 700Hz and, so it seems that the 2.5mH self has been calculated for a 11 Ohms impedance. But I mesured my two K22 with Limp and the results are a little disturbing.Here is the curve of one of them (the second one is very close):

    k22-72550-clos.jpg

    At 700Hz, the impedance is close to 17 Ohms, so it should need a 3.9mH self...

    Can the age of my speakers (30 years) explain such a difference with the theorical impedance value? I've looked for a K22 datasheet with an impedance curve, but I didn't manage to find one....

    Does anybody has any clues?

    Thanks a lot.

×
×
  • Create New...