-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by jamalstevens
-
-
6 hours ago, Bcovish said:
I have the same size room. The 260 is more than enough with a sub.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
I really wasn't planning on using a sub if I didn't have to. I'd like to keep this setup completely stereo.
-
7 hours ago, willland said:
Where is your location? Are you open to the idea of used speakers?
Bill
I'm in Michigan and yeah I'm totally ok with used.
-
1 hour ago, willland said:
Jamalstevens,
Welcome to the forum.
Your room is on the large side so I would say definitely go with the RP-280F's if you are not planning to use a subwoofer. If you are going to integrate a subwoofer, then the RP260F's will be just fine.
Bill
The room doesn't have to be bumping or anything, I normally sit about 8-9 feet from the speakers. I currently have a pair of smallll paradigm atom v.1's in in the room and they make it plenty loud but just don't have enough body.
I have been one click away from the rp-280f's I just didn't want to overshoot it for the space when I could save $150 or so and spend it on some tubes
-
Hey all,
New to the forum (and klipsch) but I've decided to bite the bullet and go with a pair of klipsch floorstanders for my main stereo setup. I plan on using them in stereo only and for music from my turntable or tidal HD streaming service. I have a room about 16 x 24ish feet with 12 ft ceilings. I'm wondering on whether or not I should save the money and go with the rp-260f's or spend the extra cash and go with the rp-280f's. What do you all think?
Thanks!
RP-260f vs. RP-280f
in General Klipsch Info
Posted
Bill,
Are the rf-63's really gonna be that much better than the new rp-280? I can get the rp-280s at my door brand new for $780. What makes the 63s so much better?
Tim, what size and brand sub would you reccomend?