MTAudioLover

I live in Montana, where their's not quite as much traffic in the electronics stores. My local dealer has the RC-64 and I got to listen to it with the RF-63's and 4 RS-62's in a 7.1 setup. I was VERY impressed with the RC-64, man that thing is HUGE though. It almost needs its own stand lol. I was also very impressed with the 63's so I can't imagine how good the 83's are...wish I could hear them :-( As far as the new reference line, I LOVE mine (I just purchased a set, you can see it in my signature). I had auditioned the older reference stuff and I liked it but I was always one of those "Klipsch speakers are too bright and don't have a mid-range" guys after i heard some of the older reference stuff. Now I own Klipsch reference...need I say more. Klipsch has me for life. I can't compare them to your setup though, because I haven't had the pleasure of listening to some of those older speakers (My audio addiction began only a few years ago).

I think either speaker might be a little too much for the other speakers in your system...especially that C-1 (It might make side-to-side transitions in the front change in timbre a little). Also, on a side note, if you are watching movies most of the time like you said, a better center will give you more natural vocals, BUT, if they're a good deal, you can't pass them up and you can always upgrade the center and surrounds later. To directly answer the question at hand though, between those two speakers and the fact that they would be the same price...go reference all the way baby. It will be as sweet as a Colts superbowl victory!!! lol

I got them via accommodations, the closest MHT store is 8 hours away...too long of a drive for me and besides, I got a screaming deal on the set. I got the 62's mainly because i live in an apartment...I'm pushing it as it is. I was even contemplating the RB's, but then I decided if I'm going to spend the money, I might as well spend it...Also, For some reason, I could only get the RC-52 and the RS-42's through the accommodations for a center and surrounds so I thought they'd match the 62's a little better than the 82's... Someday when I grow up I'll have some RF-83's, an RC-64, 4 RS-62's, and a JL Fathom sub (If i ever grow up...) but for now, my upgraditis will be in remission for a few years at least.

I finally got my speakers. I ordered 2 RF-62 towers, an RC-52 center, 2 RS-42 surrounds, and an RW-12d sub. I just want to say I LOVE them. I work at Best Buy (Unfortunately) and I've listened to the Synergy series speakers many times, and I've helped install systems with synergy speakers. For anyone trying to decide whether to go with Reference or Synergy, don't think twice...Reference is the only way to go. Don't get me wron, Synergy speakers are great, but It's now obvious why Klipsch designates the reference series as their flagship speakers. I now know why people that buy Klipsch are fans for life. I can't stop listening to them...here's the amazing part, my girlfriend, who doesn't give a hoot about speakers (Typical freakin woman) even said they sounded great. Before my purchase, I was debating on receiver choice. I was juggling between a Yamaha HTR-5960, a Denon AVR-2807, a Pioneer Elite VSX-82TXv, and a Harman/Kardon AVR-445. I liked the Yamaha for value, the Pioneer for connectivity, the Denon for their reputation, and I wasn't sure why H/K appealed to me but I was considering them none-the-less (Maybe because they're pretty - lol). I did my research and Decided to give the H/K a try due to their American heritage (even though they are assembled in China) and their reputation for unrivaled neutral sound (Klipsch speakers sound great already, so why color the sound with the receiver right?) The verdict is that I couldn't be more happy. With H/K's underrated power stats and the ultra sensitivity of the reference towers, they are a match made in heaven. My local Reference dealer has their stuff hooked up to a Denon and Pioneer Elite, and I honestly think that The H/K sound's much more accurate, and it removes any criticism that Klipsch speakers are too "Bright." H/K and Reference speakers are a perfect complement to each other. I am hearing things I haven't heard before in movies I've seen several times. For anyone struggling with a receiver choice to pair with their new, or old, Klipsch's - I definitely recommend H/K. Sorry for the Long post...I'm just giddy with my new toys...I'm sure you all understand how cool it is when you get your first good system. Speaking of which, I'm going to go listen to it now. Klipsch Reference Rocks (My whole post wrapped up in three words)

I have RF-62's, an RC-52, and 2 RS-42's I am planning to set up in 5.1. I am looking at subs. I'm going to get the RW-12d or the RW-10d. The 10" is tempting for the amount of money I would save, but, for obvious reasons, i want the 12". How much would I be losing by going with the 10"? I have a small space and It is in an apartment...but i can always turn down the volume on the 12". I guess my question is: if I went with the 10" would I regret it. (I'm sure I'll live in a larger area someday, too). Also, completely unrelated to subwoofers, I am thinking of using a Harman Kardon reciever to run the show. Anyone have any opinions on H/K? I know their specs show really low watts per channel, but they say that's not important with their recievers since they use high current. Also, the Reference Klipsch's are VERY sensitive so they handle power well. Would H/K be a good reciever to use? The other Reciever I was looking at was a Yamaha. It has more advertised watts per channel, but I've heard the sound quality is awesome with H/K and accuracy is superb. Quality is what's important to me. Maybe i just answered my own question, but I'm interested in what everyone has to say based on their experience. Thanks, Trevor