Jump to content

Windstorm

Regulars
  • Posts

    118
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Windstorm

  1. 1. Try buying a stereo -> 2X mono splitter, plug this into the center/sub output, then plug your rear speakers into that. One of the channels will carry the center signal, see if that one buzzes.

    2. Try moving the SC to a different pci slot.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  2. The headphone jack on the GTXP will not be used for center/sub, there are already outputs on the back of the breakout box for that. The headphone jack (I imagine) will be used to output a rear center channel (or two), which are a part of DTS-EX, 6.1 (o 7.1) surround.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  3. Actually, all other things being equal, a 'digital' system will sound better than analog, for example were the Promedia 5.1 to have an external decoder, they would probably sound better than if they were connected to a soundcard via analog. The reason is that the digital to analog converters in external decoders are usually of better quality, and are isolated from the electrically 'noisy' environment of a PC. The problem, however, is that some digital systems compromise the quality of other components to keep the price down. So for example the DTT3500 will have a cleaner D/A conversion because of its external decoder, but the PM 5.1 will still sound better because the amp and speakers are of better quality. Simply put the overall quality of the system makes a bigger difference than the external decoder.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  4. Will the 5.1s send bass from all the inputs to the sub? Or will the sub be used exclusively for the sub input? Also are the sub and center inputs separate, or is it one minijack for both? I am planning to buy a game theater XP, but I think it has only separate RCA outputs for the center and sub. In that case I would need an adapter to connect these to the 5.1's center/sub input, correct?

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  5. I have a mouseremote from x10.com. Controls PC functions like volume etc, software, like a dvd or mp3 player, also has a mouse joystick on it. Also works as universal remote for tvs and stuff, and you can get it to control your house lights if you buy more crap with it. Their site is full of garbage but this remote works well.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  6. I did this to my 4.00's, soldered 16 gauge right to the speakers. Pretty noticeable difference, although it could be because my rear cables are about 40 feet. It was pretty easy to do on the 4.00's since they only have a cap btw the midbass and tweeters, the 4.1's have a croosover IC in each sat so it may be harder... but it did improve quality a bit.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  7. Forget about gaming if you get a G450. If you look at any reviews of the G450 vs Radeon VE, you will see the VE smokes the G450. I just got a VE and it benchmarks slower than my old TNT2. (Image quality is a lot better though!!) So just imagine how slow the 450 will be. Agreed that the 2D on the Matrox is top notch though. Personally I'd recommend a Radeon LE - its basically a 32meg radeon DDR with some high perf features disabled. The beauty is you can reenable them with tweaks you can find on any HW site. So its basically a Radeon DDR for next to nothing in price. I wuld have bought one myself, except I needed the dual heads the the VE has.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  8. That's exactly right, you can use either your sound card or the decoder to do the decoding. The only difference is the sound quality - for example when 3Dsoundsurge.com tested the midiland decoder they said that Dolby Digital decoding was better, by a "small but noticeable" margin. It all depends on how well your sound card decodes DD. Also the decoder may have additional features the sound card doesn't such as DTS decoding. In a nutshell though, the decoder and your 5.1 card will both do the same thing - although the consensus seems to be that hardware decoders are slightly better quality-wise.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  9. I have an athlon 500 @ 770, creative tnt2, 17" monitor, and 4.00's. Also have a pioneer 16X slot load dvd. Anyway my setup works great for HT, the only ***** is my 17" monitor, but I am getting a projector soon...mmmm..... 120" screen. My room is aboy 4X7m, the only thing I can think of is that a center channel would be nice since my sats are 4m apart.. other than that it works awesome for 2-4 people, except for the small monitor I currently have. Hardware wise my PC handles the DVD decoding flawlessly, just make sure you use a good program like powerdvd 3.0, or better yet, windvd 2000 4 channel.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  10. True center is better, especially if the satellites are far apart. On the other hand, you will not be disappointed by a phantom channel, unless you have a system with a true center to compare with.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  11. No reason why it shouldn't work, but it may affect the sound quality - I don't know how 'clean' the power coming from an inverter is. Also most of the cheap inverters are 300 watts, the pros can pull up to 600, so you would need an inverter that can handle this much. They are a little(a lot actually) more expensive.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

  12. Since you can't find a rca to stereo adapter, then get a mono to stereo splitter and plug that into the adapter you already have - the idea is to split the mono signal into a stereo sig with identical left/rights.

    ------------------

    Caring is the first step toward disappointment.

×
×
  • Create New...