I have been doing quite a bit of research here, and at places like AVSForum and there seems to be two contradicting lines of thought. As the title says, I have a pair of RF-83s (just got them and I love them, though I feel I am not doing them justice. I previously had the VF-35s which from Best Buy so the upgrade in question is HUGE) with an RC-62. When I move, I plan on upgrading the center to an RC-64 and start looking into getting a few surrounds, but that is a little down the road. Anyway, I am seeing two conflicting answers usually when it comes to getting an amp for these speakers which are...
A) The RF-83s are so efficient, getting an amp will make almost no difference.
The RF-83s recommended power is 250w and they love every bit of it.
Right now, I am driving them with a Pioneer VSX-1018 AH (110 watt / channel over 7 channels. I've done a little more research on the receiver and there are a lot of reports out there talking about how inefficient receivers tend to be, especially when it comes to some of the lower end ones. I've even heard people claiming I would be lucky to get 60 watts per channel out of the receiver. That is a far-cry from the claimed 110 watts.
So, to anyone who has direct experience with the RF-83s and amps and has a good ear, my question, did you find there was a difference in sound quality? I am digging the Emotiva XPA-3. It's right in my price range, and I haven't heard really any negative reviews about them. There was a Klipsch Dealer close that closed up shop, they were always good about letting me take speakers home to listen, are other dealers like that? Will they look at me like I am crazy if I ask to take an amp home to demo?
Thanks for any help and sorry, I am sure this question has been asked a ton of times already.