Jump to content

jnorv

Regulars
  • Posts

    393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jnorv

  1. If I remember right, Klipsch used different expansion rates for each section of the K-horn. He refered to it as a rubber throat. NOt sure which paper he thus discribed it, but it was in one of his writings.

    Upon further checking, he discribes this effect in "A Low Frequency Horn of Small Dimensions", 1941 and in "Improved Low Frequency Horn", 1942.

    Jim N

  2. I suspect that most high end TT manufacturers build their TTs with the idea that they will be put on non resonate , immoble stands. As a mechanical engineer, I find it hard to believe that any TT would not be better off setting on 3000 pounds of concrete imbedded in the ground rather than on some highly engineered rack on some unknown floor. It is the same argument made about the flexure of the panels of large horns that somehow adds to the listening enjoyment, as if the designers somehow tuned their speakers for panel flex.

    Jim N.

  3. The design of wall mounted racks is not rocket science. I built one for a friend out of 2x4s and plywood. Mounted on an outside wall it was absolutely stable. He was running a Linn with an air bearing ET arm. One of the few systems that I have listened to that could resolve the opening tracks of DSOTM. You could jump up and down on the floor next to it and not get mistracking.

    Jim N

  4. An old friend showed up from London and wanted to listen to some Stones. Since I did not have any on Cd I drug out the turn table and th boxes of old vinyl. Still dont like the Stones , but I did rediscover Hendrix. He does things with stings that rival Mingus and Coltrane.

    Jim N

  5. For almost no money, you can get a feel for what a RTA does. Go to WWW.trueaudio.com and download his free software. That and a $3 mike from Fry's will give you some idea of what an RTA will do. I bought into the full 1/24 octative analyzer for $100.

    Jim

  6. RTA - Real time analyzer. It takes an incoming signal and displays it's energy content as a funtion of frequency. For a perfect speaker, if you put in a pink noise signal, the output would be flat on an RTA. The Shark preamp does what any preamp does. It takes a low level signal and converts it to a higher level. This one also provides the power to drive the mike. I use mine to look at the frequency response of my various low end speaker experiments. I am trying to get flat to 30 Hz. So far I am down to about 35 with my 828's and 515B's.

    Jim N

  7. C&S,

    I am in the process of installing a pair of 2245s (18) in the bottom of my 828 cabinets. Sealing the upper portion for a horn loaded mid (515 B). Did you horn load your 515 or just do a BR box.? How low are you using your 515s? What frequency did you tune the 515 box to?

    Jim N

  8. Well they dont really have a sound. Do a search in 2 channel on tripath. Leok has done extensive work with them. He suggests some mods to the eval boards for better sound. I am just running them as they came from the factory, since I am an ME and am electronically challenged. I use them for background music during the week. For serious listening I use a 300B SET for the HF and a Rowland 5 for the LF. I think that that sounds better but not by much. Idle power is 0.6 watts. At 100 db, using 288s on 1005s and 515Bs in 828 cabinets, I see maybe 2.4 watts draw.

    Jim

×
×
  • Create New...