2-Channel Home Audio

Talk about stereo amp and speaker matching here.

30712 topics in this forum

    • 41 replies
    • 2418 views
    • 3 replies
    • 1345 views
    • 80 replies
    • 4627 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1246 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1334 views
    • 3 replies
    • 4265 views
    • 0 replies
    • 7113 views
    • 6 replies
    • 158 views
    • 3 replies
    • 33 views
    • 2 replies
    • 45 views
    • 5 replies
    • 46 views
    • 34 replies
    • 1054 views
    • 1 reply
    • 60 views
    • 23 replies
    • 341 views
    • 9 replies
    • 210 views
    • 45 replies
    • 1454 views
    • 50 replies
    • 947 views
    • 9 replies
    • 301 views
    • 323 replies
    • 8605 views
    • 1 reply
    • 59 views
    • 25 replies
    • 461 views
    • 33 replies
    • 598 views
    • 20 replies
    • 239 views
    • 6 replies
    • 163 views
    • 3 replies
    • 140 views
  • Recent Posts

    • Physical time alignment can work if the higher frequency horn (whose horn mouth is further away from the listener), isn't occluded by the midrange or lower frequency horn mouths.    Most multiway horns that are physically time time-aligned usually have real issues in that regard that cause other listening issues...like diffraction in the crossover region if the horn centerlines are more than 1/4 wavelength apart, and coverage issues around the room from the occlusion of the larger horn mouths.      Danley's multiple-entry horns are the only ones that are time aligned and aren't self-occluding...  
    • Welcome to the forum Eric!  I don't see why you'd have any problem using the CDT-5650's with your setup.  Call around for the best price.   Hope you stay around and post often!
    • As Thebes will attest, and I will back him up, there is nothing funny about the boy band in question, unless you like the colossal joke played upon the public which has shown no musical discretion in the matter.
    • Three two channel systems, trying to sell one, but if not, it will stay at home, some things happen for a reason.
    • Sweet!!!  Are you going to use the 15" ported cube from diysoundgroup?   http://www.diysoundgroup.com/ported-subwoofers-1/15-cube/cube15.html   How well does it model in a 3cf sealed box?  I get the impression that this driver is designed to deliver powerful mid-bass instead of real deep extension.
    • you guys drinking coffee while you’re doing all this crap?
    • I was fortunate that the two I got for $300 were only dirty.   
    • Thank you "JW", very kind of you to say it's break time...
    • You guys are a tough audience.   Pull at my necktie, "I get no respect."  I went to a store to buy some Klipsch.  The salesman said, "A  man of your intelligence should buy Bose."   No respect, I tell you.   OTimer, the CD (arranged by George Martin?) is about the same as the YouTube.    I put this up as humor rather than a copyright infringement action.    Smile,   WMcD
    • In my view, nothing to worry about.   For the Heritage speaks made in Hope they match veneer for pairs.  If the units are made overseas, who knows.  My Forte II and Chorus are good looking but I've never critiqued figuring of veneer.  The front panel of K-Horns should be matched but the sides of the others, who cares?   But the sequential serial number comes up from time to time.  We're really worried about the drivers with the thought that close sisters off the assembly line will have close performance even if more distant cousins drift off somehow and you get an unbalanced pair rather than twins.   Realistically, this is not like Department of Defense serial number tracing of components.  Someplace, a factory makes the drivers and horn, and crossover,  and put them in a box and then someone takes a pair out of the shipping box installs them in the speaker box.  I doubt if the components  are checked as being sisters. There may be QC that they all work within spec.   Without DoD prices, no one can afford to trace sequential drivers, horns, and crossovers, and caps and inductors, etc..    That is my thought.   WMcD