I've spent quite a few days reading about different options for a speaker purchase. Perhaps I should have posted sooner to save myself some time.... but alas, here I am with a few questions for those that know more than me.
For quite some time I've been saying, "when we move I'm going to get a (5.1) HT system." Well the moving part hasn't happened and doesn't appear to be happening anytime soon judging by the kitchen renovation currently underway. So, I'm looking to purchase a 2.1 system that I can possibly grow in a year or two if we do get a larger house.
The primary use will be 70% music. 20% TV. and 10% movies. (so really 2.1 is probably all I'll ever need...but...)
For a current 2.1 I'm thinking either RP-160M or RP-150M. Then, when I grow the house/system I can use these as the surround speakers and buy RP-280s to replace them as fronts. Do you think the RP-160M is too big for a rear speaker? The RP-150M has a hook mount for mounting. The RP-160M does not but I have seen platform mounts for them (which would also help get them out from the wall a bit.) Looking forward, which would be a better surround speaker for 5.1? The RP-160M or RP-150M? Or is this generally a bad idea and the answer neither?
For current 2.1 use, if I have a sub will I notice much difference between the RP-150 and RP-160? I've read that without a sub the 160s are the way to go. But with a sub will it matter much?
And, the third question, would it be a sin to use R-10SW as the sub? I see myself wanting R-112/115SW in a larger home so the price of the R-10SW is attractive over R-110SW since it won't have a use later.
If I were to do towers the only thing I'd have room for is the RP-250F and at 15" deep that's really pushing it. They look so dinky compared to the RP-280F anyway I'd just assume wait until I have the room for 8" floors.
Thanks for any advice. And if you can think of another plan for this situation please let me know!