KEITH CANADA Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I SAW AN OLD SALES PAGE FOR THE LASCALA LSI IT'S ON EBAY ,BUT THEY WERE RATED FOR 300W CONT AT 8 OHMS AND 1200W PEAK,WAS THERE A DIFFERENT RATING SYSTEM IN THE 70'S AND 80'S ,OR ARE THEY THAT MUCH BEEFER THAN A STANDARD LASCALA FORM THE SAME TIME FRAME, WITH AL CROSSOVERS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest " " Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 There are many different spec's published for LaScala's, LSI's and TLSI's over the years. The most accurate one in my opinion, is the one that lists from 0 - 400hz=25 watts, 400-5000hz=100watts, 5000-20000hz=25watts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KanedaK Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 Don't know about the exact rating, but the Industrial version uses a different woofer (K43?) with more power handling, but it is also said to reach a little bit less deep in the lows than a K33 (don't know if it is true). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colterphoto1 Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 Hi Keith, welcome aboard. The last post gives the info you need but if you go to the Pro section below, you'll find out all kinds of information about the LS Industrial versions and other Klipsch Pro gear (they built quite a few models). If I was using them in live PA today, I'd hook em up to 400-500 watts each. Better to have too much power to avoid clipping. They can take it short term (don't let the amp LED's stay lit). Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.