Mark4583

Im just woundering if I get a cleaner sound with a dedicated CD player and that a HT is more than I need since I wont be using it as a HT system, same with Reciver. Im more concerned with the sound I get from them.

Im setting up a home Audio system for music only and at the Moment looking at the RF-35's, just gona be a basic system, Reciever/cd with a Sub and book shelf speakers added later. Any advantage or disavantage going with a HT Reciver and DVD or would I have the better sound from a 2 chanel system. What works nicely with the RF 35's ? My budgets aabout $500 for the reciever and about $300 for the DvD/CD player. I listen to alot of Floyd, Parsons,SRV, Clapton, Clasic rock with some CW,R&B mixed in. Thanks

Walked into a Salvation Army one day about 10 yrs ago to drop some stuff off and sitting in the corner was a 66 Strat for $50 !!! Not saying it happends all the time but it might be a place to check out for one.

Im lookint at the RF 35's for a 2 channel home audio system and im woundering how they sound after break in, I listen to alot of clasic and accoustic rock. Seems like these have some nice high's but lack a little bass which a Sub should work nicely to take care of that.

Im considering purchasing the RF-35's and I want to match it with the Denon DRA-395 or 685, most likely the 395, should be plenty of power for me and probaly a Denon DVD, I want this just for music, I have a seperate HTS. Any RF-35 owners have this set up, hows it sound? Have a couple more speakers to listen to before I make a choice but I am leaning to the RF-35's, Any one DONT like them? and why? Thanks