In the first place sir, if you think that was an attack you are mistaken.
In the second I am not the one pontificating about "My Mod is great EVERYTHING else is junk." Just because you say something is so doesn't make it true. Your anecdotal evidence about critical Klipsch management proves virtually nothing, except that you claim these people exist and they've said XY and Z. Please provide names and details. Please provide any research results. Their decision to use tractrix addresses many engineering goals. None of which means the exponential horns were junk nor poorly designed. They are different to be sure. Better is a judgement call. Unless you hold exclusive rights to judgement as well.
By playing nice in the sandbox I mean support your contentions, not with JBL literature or stomping your feet and name calling but with fact. Your replies are quite predictable and frankly beginning to bore the dogshit out of me.
What it's beginning to sound like is that you've dumped beacou dollars into your system and now you need to justify it.And everytime someone points even the mildest criticism your way you get hissy.
By the way, any and every time you introduce digital delay into a signal you've opened pandora's box in terms of imaging depth. The signal also tends to sound a bit sterile. Did the pro sound gods mention that? That's why Richard Vandersteen spent so long coming up with a way to do it passively. That's why I'd prefer to live with the Khorns as they are now rather than add digital delay to make them "measure" better.
As to point 2 in your reply, the part about you not being a scientist nor an engineer, that sir is quite obvious.
JWG