Jump to content

Heritage_Head

Heritage Members
  • Posts

    5558
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Heritage_Head

  1. [

    Only because you asked I would have paid about 500 tops for the pair because of that corner. Ones in good shape sell for about 800-1000 I think. I have seen some that sell for around 600 with dented cones but you can replace the driver for about 150.

    Oh wow, looks like you're definitely a stickler eh? I mean the speaker sells for like $850 each brand new on Amazon right now (since it's the newer Classic RF-7 and all). I definitely didn't get THAT good of a deal then if 500-600 is what you'd pay. I did ask though so I appreciate your input. I can tell I will get my money's worth out of these babies already Big Smile

    Well they are definitely worth more than 500. I’m just

    saying on the used market with the smashed corner. Because they normally go for

    800-1000 is mint condition I think.

    All that matters is that you’re happy. I’m sure they sound

    amazing.

    Plus I’m not the authority on used gear.[:D]

  2. Be-A-utiful!!! Wow. I really like those. Love my cherry original 7's, but those are gorgeous.

    They remind me of "decorator" Heritage gear. Just stunning. If not for the corner blemish, the grills would never see the light of day in my house!!

    Congrats!!

    Ps- an added bonus is that 7s kick A LOT of tail in the sound department too!!!

    Thanks again kind sir. Yea I think even with the corner blemish I might keep the grills off most of the time (except when my friends are all over playing pool and ping pong in the adjacent room connected by a half wall...they're animals that can't be trusted). The room they're in is very dark most of the time due to blacked out windows and dim lighting so you only see the corner damage when up close and looking at it. Can't really tell from the listening position.

    On a side note - what do you think a good price for these is? Not that I'm at all uncomfortable with what I spent on them but I'm a curious dude. Chime in with what you would all individually pay for them if you were buying them used from someone. With knowledge of the corner damage of course because I knew that before buying as well and of course used to it to haggle the price a bit.

    Only because you asked I would have paid about 500 tops for

    the pair because of that corner. Ones in good shape sell for about 800-1000 I think.

    I have seen some that sell for around 600 with dented cones but you can replace

    the driver for about 150.

  3. Brunt I know this doesn’t help because it’s not onkyo but I set

    my avr mode to auto. And it reads the highest mode available. Pro llx will work

    really good though I have toggled to it

    and it sounds the same as auto to my ears. You will still have the lossless

    tracks with the added content in the rear. On blu rays with ES its basically

    6.1. In fact on my screen ES shows as 6.1. Here is a movie that is dts hd 5.1

    ES. (Just like lord of the rings)

    That’s what it shows on the ps3 blu ray player when I hit

    display on it.

    post-50231-13819663599124_thumb.jpg

  4. Using plain old Dolby Pro-Logic IIx: Movie is the most common way. Contrary to popular belief, Pro Logic doesn't alter everything, it just matrixes what isn't there to begin with. So it'll matrix stereo into all seven (or six) channels, but if it's a discrete 5.1 signal it will only touch the rears. Other proprietary options include Logic 7 on HK equipment, and less commonly, DTS Neo:6. THX Cinema usually uses the default Dolby Pro-Logic II algorithm, and then applies their proprietary filters on top of it.

    As for your random matrixing, if a disc is encoded with an EX tag, it automatically asks the receiver to matrix it. Content with EX tags have discrete content matrixed the other way (discrete sixth channel information downmixed into the side surround channels), that is then pulled back out by Pro Logic into 6.1 with the surround backs operating as one "channel". It's not quite as good as discrete 6.1 or 7.1, but it's an improvement. In your Onkyo receiver, there should be a setting that allows you to tell the receiver what to do with EX tagged material when it encounters it. By default, it's set to matrix automatically. "Matrix EX" doesn't change the inherent quality of the signal, it just mixes information from the surround sides into the rears...

    EDIT: For owners of recent Onkyo/Integra receivers, you can go into the menu, then go "3. Audio Adjust" -> "3-2 Dolby" -> "Dolby EX" and select either auto or manual. Setting it to manual will override the default EX tags and force your receiver to use the audio format you have selected as the default for that input...

    FYI, my Lord of The Rings is a Blu Ray...do Blu Rays have EX tags? I thought DTS EX was a DVD only format?

    Lord of the rings is dts-hd ma 5.1 ES (6.1) not ex

  5. That's a pretty nice set, especially once you get about 15 foot away. Any closer and the reduced edge brightness becomes a bit of an issue, but it's quite impressive, especially for the price.

    The best part of that TV is that it shows us how close we

    are to getting to 70+ tvs for a really good price. I’m probably going to wait

    and see what comes next. But that TV came out in May 2011 so maybe around April

    2012 that TV might dip under 2k. If it does I might buy it.

  6. It’s a huge forum here is a link. You will have to dig in and look for it its over 800 pages....

    OMG. Surprise I am not going to dig through there, but suffice it to say without a link to the guys impressions of the differences between the RF-7 and RF-7II your picture is about as useful as a Youtube video that started this discussion. Indifferent

    Fwiw, that looks like the German version of the AVS Forum's Klipsch Owners Thread, which has turned into a fanboy club instead of anyone doing any critical thinking (with the exception of a few conscientious Heritage owners). Again. this isn't a shot at you reference head, but musings about how people buy speakers nowadays and believe everything they see on the internet. Computer

    Well the guy’s name is Harley. Lol

    didn’t want to go though it either watching football. It’s in the 600s I think if that helps. (feb

    2011 I think I will look later). Happy to be a 7 owner new or old big or small

    they sound great both of them!!!

  7. When blu rays first starting

    doing lossless audio they just called it uncompressed lossless audio. Then Dolby

    truehd came out. Shortly after that DTS

    HD MA. But all it really is is uncompressed

    lossless audio with a fancy HD name. When a blu ray player reads DTS HD MA 5.1

    ES its reading 6.1 separate channels. I just don’t understand how you don’t see

    that as a 6.1 lossless audio track regardless of what information is being sent

    to the 6th channel. It’s

    mixed as 6.1 and called ES. [:)]

  8. Interesting...... Yeah, I figured that the back surrounds would take the 'center' rear.... but you would not be listening to a high resolution audio since its not encoded as such correct ?

    Great on the bluray 7.1's you have, but how many blurays do you have that are not ?? Out of my very small collection of blurays, only TWO are in 7.1 while the rest are 5.1 ... Also a friend of mine made comment about the DTS vs. the Dolby thing, and it seems that its swung toward more releases in DTS these days. Have you found this to be true in your collection?

    ...........g

    Its high resolution lossless

    audio. Look at the pic again it shows it

    was at 4.4 mbps that’s super high resolution audio. I think you have a different

    idea to what DTS-HD 5.1 MA ES audio is. It’s an audio format not a gimmick or

    lesser audio format in resolution audio. Lord of the rings is DTS-HD MA 5.1ES audio;

    The Incredibles is as well just name a few.

    It’s a higher end audio then just

    basic DTS-HD 5.1 MA

    http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Lord-of-the-Rings-The-Motion-Picture-Trilogy-Blu-ray/5174/

    http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Incredibles-Blu-ray/96/

  9. Just looked at your recent photo...............Yes, DTS MA is discrete, but its NOT 6.1 ... Its 5.1 or 7.1 ... I am more curious as to what the NON highlighted 6.1 mode does...........as mentioned, by all correctness, you should never see that 6.1 unless you have a 6.1 format in the player... Also, your comment on 'Old Old' ..... Well, we didn't have BluRay in 2004 which was the orginal release date of the movie, however, HD 1080p are the upgrades to this movie and the audio portion is probably original...

    all for the moment...

    Put in any DTS MA 5.1 ES movie

    and the blu ray player will decode it into 6.1 channels. ES is 6.1 audio it’s

    not the same as the old EX. Here is a link to a brand new release in 6.1 audio.

    The blu ray player has to be able

    to decode ES or it won’t be 6.1. If you have an old blu ray player that doesn’t

    support ES then you won’t get 6.1.

    http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Star-Wars-Blu-ray/14903/

  10. What’s wrong with talking about the look?Huh?

    I care more about how a speaker sounds. Do you have a link to the review?

    Ok so do I but what’s wrong with

    talking about the looks to? Why are you getting

    defensive?

  11. Hello there....

    I thought I would continue with the discussion of the 6.1 rear center channel seems that is the theme as of late.

    You may have not seen many, if ANY of these, so, I dug up my one and only 6.1 BluRay.

    Here you can see the DTS 'ES' spec in discrete audio.... While the Dolby 'EX' is 5.1 with a mix or matrix to the rear center.

    All for now..

    ............g

    That’s not even HD audio. That’s old

    old. When you run dts-hd ma ES and you look at the display on a ps3 its 6.1. The

    pic below is the blu ray player display for DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 ES.

    post-50231-13819663349968_thumb.jpg

  12. No it’s a guy on a different forum he reviews gear and speakers. He reviewed them side by side. I have seen and heard them side by side though. The new rf-7ii look like the old ones on steroids side by side. Surprise

    Well...There seems to be alot of talk about how a speaker looks as opposed to how it sounds and I would be interested in a link to that dudes audio review if you have it.

    What’s

    wrong with talking about the look?[:^)]

  13. TDK, not all of us are "Zen travelers." Granted, I live in Kansas, and we have more cows than people here, but I haven't found anywhere within 4 hours to listen to RF-7 IIs. There are several stores that "carry" them, but they require a deposit prior to ordering them. On the other hand, just 30 minutes away is a high end store that sells the complete Heritage and Palladium line. Over the course of a year they demo all of the high end Klipsch models for a one month period each. Listening is by apointment only.

    I can dig it...Then again, if what you are reporting is the new status quo there is Hope (pun intended) for the Palladium and Heritage lines because at that price point I don't imagine folks spend that kind of money without auditioning....Heck y'all are starting to convince me that folks that don't audition is who the New Reference series is geared towards.

    Not tuff to sell this Wink (new rf-7ii and old rf-7)

    They

    sell themselves

    (Points at rf-7ii) it’s big for a reason!

    That doesnt look like an RF-7 next to the RF-7 ll. The RF-7 and RF-7 ll are exactly the same except the RF-7 ll is half an inch taller. They are the same width and same depth. That RF-7 ll in this picture is way bigger than the speaker next to it. Those don't even look like 10's in the speaker.

    Vital the drivers are bigger in the new rf-7ii. Get a tape

    out and measure your 10s they are just barely 9” (if that). The new ones are a

    little over 9”. Also it’s not the same

    horn and it does look bigger but I’m pretty sure it’s the same size. I think

    his plastic feet are broken on one side and its leaning to one side. That might be why it looks narrower.

    post-50231-13819663343984_thumb.jpg

  14. Not tuff to sell this Wink (new rf-7ii and old rf-7)

    They sell themselves

    (Points at rf-7ii) it’s big for a reason!

    Do you own both speakers?

    No it’s a guy on a different forum he reviews gear and

    speakers. He reviewed them side by side. I have seen and heard them side by

    side though. The new rf-7ii look like

    the old ones on steroids side by side. [:o]

  15. TDK, not all of us are "Zen travelers." Granted, I live in Kansas, and we have more cows than people here, but I haven't found anywhere within 4 hours to listen to RF-7 IIs. There are several stores that "carry" them, but they require a deposit prior to ordering them. On the other hand, just 30 minutes away is a high end store that sells the complete Heritage and Palladium line. Over the course of a year they demo all of the high end Klipsch models for a one month period each. Listening is by apointment only.

    I can dig it...Then again, if what you are reporting is the new status quo there is Hope (pun intended) for the Palladium and Heritage lines because at that price point I don't imagine folks spend that kind of money without auditioning....Heck y'all are starting to convince me that folks that don't audition is who the New Reference series is geared towards.

    Not tuff to sell this [;)] (new rf-7ii and old rf-7)

    They

    sell themselves

    (Points at rf-7ii) it’s big for a reason!

  16. I’m guessing lagolas is super excited to get his new

    speakers and he wants to see some good video shots of them in action. I’m guessing

    that the sound he hears probably won’t really matter contrary to what he says. This

    would have probably gone over better if he had just said that and not that he

    wanted to hear them. Just my guess I could be wrong. But when I ordered mine I looked

    all over the internet that week online looking at pics and reviews.

    well your almost right, i said i really think that these are the one's for me. in action will drop the axes. it couldn't gone any different because i knew people will crucify Angry me when i'll ask them to post a demo and base my decisions on that, well what can i say? this is me. i'm trying to be as close as i can to the RF 7ii before i buy them, a demo for me does the trick.

    p.s. your system is great !!! i got your system pics as a screen saver on my HTC Big Smile

    Thank you for your kind words[:$]. If it helps it sounds better

    than it looks. [:D]

×
×
  • Create New...