Jump to content

robc1976

Regulars
  • Posts

    250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by robc1976

  1. 9.1 has a lot of reflection points LOL!!

    Now don't get me wrong because your system looks very nice and I am jealous of all of the room you have. I've got 92 inches of space to cram the whole front in. And bare in mind I have not listened to a system like yours. Now my room is very cluttered with lots of crap so this could be taking place of the panels in a clean room like yours? But isn't surround sound designed to be reflected? Isn't that the reason for die-pole speakers? Have you ever had die-pole's in your system or listened to them to compare? I was thinking of using the RS-62 or 52 II for rear and RS-42 II for side and RS-41 or 42 II for heights.
    That is correct, the relection points I was refering to is only the front-soundstage....your surrounds you want some reflected sound off the sidewallls/backwall but NOT off the front wall. In a room the size of yours bipoles can make your room sound bigger than it is (a good thing)....but in my room I didn't care for them...I preferred the direct firing bookshelf. This could also be me to.....some love bipoles.
  2. Got my 6 242 GIK panels today and mounted them on the drop ceiling (that was NOT fun!!) and thought I would post some before and after pics....I havent ran Audyssey on it yet but the sound is a lot more crisp and smooth sounding. 9.1 has a lot of reflection points LOL!!

    Here is the foam before:

    Posted Image


    Here are the new panels:

    Posted Image

    Posted Image

    Posted Image

    Posted Image

  3. First, I wanna say I have NEVER and I mean never had such great servive anywhere....I have talked to Byran & christina on the phone and probally have sent byran 100 emails LOL!! if not more. He answer quickly and enjoys doing so....I just made 2 more orders on top of all of this and will be doing my other sysyem with GIK and will suggest them to ANYONE.

    figured I would post some pics of some traetments I have redone.

    Here is the foam I had with all reflection points "Left side MLP"

    Posted Image


    GIK suggested 3 panels on this side and the farthest panel is not touching the "tri-trap" although it looks like it LOL!!

    Posted Image


    Here is the foam I had with all reflection points "right side MLP"

    Posted Image

    GIK suggested 3 panels on this side also.

    Posted Image


    Here is the Tr-trap in the corner, I have 2 tops coming also that will stack on these full size ones and will extend it to the top.

    Posted Image

    Here is the foam I have on the ceiling with reflection points (all 3 seats) and I have 6 242 panels on the way to put in place of the foam.

    Posted Image

    So far the bass has improved dramitaclly and the detail has also increased dramitacly over the foam.

  4. back to davidness.I have a Yamaha RX-V665 which has these sound features your talking about and for me I think they are just a waste of time. I tried all the settings and to me all it does is add varying degrees of echo and I usually only listen in the 7.1 mode.You so right about the sound not being crisp and coming from all different directions and I can't stand it.For total transparency I'm running a set of Klipsch 500 smalls w/ an 8in pwrd sub.

    ???? are you serious...front heights are the single biggest improvment...welll actuallly the wides.....why would this make the surrounds not crisp.....something is wrong there or you have a VERY small room. Regular 7.1 is a waste because you never here S.Back.
  5. All panels are 2x4 absortion from acoustimac. Filled with ecoustimac material. I got them mainly to cut down on the echo in the room. I actually had four left over that I wasnt sure what to do with. Two of them went on the tv wall, the other two are sitting waiting. Debating on the ceiling?

    I bet those treatments made a difference, mine did for sure. Maybe some diffusion between those panels on the ceiling? I placed some over MLP and it made a unbelievable diference.
  6. Also, for music you may want to try the Audyssey flat curve, I like this alot more for music...but again my room is treated also...but I did prefer this when it wasn't. I used to use this for movies as well but realized the Audyssey curve is better for movies/games INMHO! Also make sure dynamic volume is NOT set to "evening"...if it is it will sound very weak compared to the "day setting" I turn mine off.

  7. Does anyone have a similar setup to the one I have? I ask because I am not thrilled with the sound i hear during music and movies. I do not get the "WOW" factor when listening. I am considering an external amp. Any advice?

    I have a 9.1 systym with 4 Rf-82II up font and Rc-64-II and it will blow you away. Klipsch speakers are pretty efficent and a lot of power is not needed.

    Here is my systym minus the surrounds:

    Posted Image

  8. I had mine done with ecoustic material. No fiberglass here. Dangerous. My whole room cost maybe $1100

    you also have pretty tall ceilings to if I am not mistaken? Bet it sounds good!
    No, not really. 8-9 foot peak.
    From the video I saw it looked to be 12-15 lol!! The vaulted ceilings are awesome though....have you considered any sound diffussion up there?, I am considering it on my back walll and above my listening position.
  9. I hear you on that Rob....

    Oh, some kind of staining.... hmmmm Why not simply paint to match (seal first with a 'BullsEye' product first) ? Easier and less expensive then total replacement, unless its trashed already Surprise

    Ok, have fun.............

    The theater here is coming together once again... Contractor coming over first thing Tuesday morning to put all new base board moldings in and doing some small wall repairs, then I get to clean the brand new floors up and start reconstruction... Been without since March but it will be so good to have it back once again Yes ...

    Post pics! When finished!
×
×
  • Create New...