Jump to content

Jim Naseum

Regulars
  • Posts

    2026
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Jim Naseum

  1. Absurd forms of drug abuse are exactly what is predicted when drugs become a central focus of law enforcing and criminal Justice. Young kids get locked up in juvi halls, where they can be sexually and emotionally abused by adults who hold power over them. This adds greatly to the emotional damage and almost assures high risk drug use with off color tainted drugs.

    And then the adults come along and blame kids for being screwed up by drugs! If we could lockup the many thousand of pedophiles and abusers who use the CJ system to find their prey we'd cut most of the problems down to size.

    When you find a large population of frigged up kids...... Look no further than abusing adults.

    Sent from my SM-T330NU using Tapatalk

    • Like 2
  2. Hint: Where do the suppose their dead relations go? Why do some of them meditate? Who is it that many of them are confessing to? From whence come the ideas of nihilism? Pantheism? The Trinity? Manifest Destiny?

    Metaphysics, not physics. Irrelevant to this thread and would simply result in a lock anyway.

    Dave

    Where have you been? Metaphysics has been part of this thread for days. Metaphysics is an essential part of cosmology. I can only assume you hadn't been reading along.

    Sent from my SM-T330NU using Tapatalk

  3. Does anyone have the actual paper related to the gravitational wave measurements? I'd like to learn more about their sensor configuration and all that.....the super nitty details, not the high level stuff.

    Back to Hawking - I have always found a stark contrast between Hawking and Einstein....in that Hawking is very much sensationalized and focuses on the fanciful. Einstein seemed way more grounded in reality. Perhaps that's the way Hawking is portrayed by the media, but I simply don't consider the two anywhere close to being in the same category. Has Hawking presented us with anything practical? I honestly don't know (that wasn't a rhetorical question). A quick glance through Wikipedia makes it sounds like all of his ideas have been contradicted by others? And lots of debates and challenges about things?

    Btw, don't forget that Einstein introduced us to the idea of "space-time" - which is to say the dimensions and time are one and the same (or intrinsically related). I've been meaning to sit down and run the special relativity mathematics to see what idea we can derive about how "fast" things were moving during a "Big Bang" or "Creation Event". The thing that surprises me is how similar the two mechanisms would manifest themselves. Why couldn't they be the same thing? I want to see what the different relativistic observation points would observe in terms of time elapsed. Perhaps someone has already conducted that analysis?

    What is practical about relativity? Einstein was very playful, and Hawking can't even speak. It's hard to imagine how 'fanciful' and 'sensational' are being applied here. I realize those at subjective, but I've never heard anyone inside or outside of science use those words for Hawking.

    Sent from my SM-T330NU using Tapatalk

  4.  It would be nice if people could revel in being healthy and alert and active.  

     

    For the most part, I agree - as a general sense. But, in all of history, there has always been a need and desire for mind altering drugs. The reasons are many. First, there is escapism from dire realities like fear, insecurity; second there is a desire for mind altering consciousness expansion (spirituality rituals);  and third is recreation. The need for various kinds of inebriation, and escape are universal in almost all cultures.

     

    Alcohol is the worst choice for general use because it has higher aggressiveness than other drugs, and no one has much claimed any conscious expanding on alcohol. I think the right and best answer would be to legalize institutional and professional use of all hallucinogens and empathogens. So that, psychiatrists for example, could treat mental disorders with these drugs. Simple inebriating drugs like MJ, and perhaps some opiates and empathogens, should be decriminalized. My reasoning is that it is very regressive that the upper classes can take advantage of these drugs with impunity, while the poor use them at great risk of prison.

     

    People deserve more personal freedom.  

    • Like 5
  5. Just strange since a few years ago I was thinking about buying a Hyundai Elantra just to drive to work in so I could save gave money. I have spent $100 to fill up my truck before. Two of those a month and that's a car payment. Driving a big truck just isn't an issue right now. Curious as to how long it is going to be like this.

     

    I wouldn't count on more than 18 mos. 

     

    Just take a look at the historical price chart. Full of peaks and valleys.

  6. Our reserves of gas are growing radically in the USA. It's even killing off solar! I can see that as gas reserves grow and prices keep plummeting, yes, manufacturing could come back here considering that unions have been decimated, and the surplus labor has risen to almost historical levels. Labor participation extremely low. People have to begin to take any job they can find to pay for the mandated health insurance now that fines are climbing to the $000 of dollars. 

  7. The incomparable Bob Carver was (maybe) the first to easily demonstrate that SS amps can be made to sound "identical" to tube amps. And he did it with only a few adjustments, which I believe were global feedback and output impedance controls. This, in spite of the fact the triodes and bipolars have totally different transfer functions. He made the game one of simple topology. 

  8. 5674, I have for a long time pondered that housing should ideally not be such a major component of the economy.  Germany has done quite well without much new housing.  This is to be expected with a stable population.  What do they do---well they actually make things and sell them to people who need or want them.

     

    True enough. But in pure GDP terms, those lost billions in housing must be made up. See my previous chart on global GDP growth? it's pathetic and has been on a long slide. Debt must be rolled over - and that demands higher GDPs! 

  9. By now everyone has owned 4 generations of PCs, 3 generations of Kindle readers, 4 generations of cheap tablets, 4 generations of flat TVs, and half dozen generations of miniature telephones. 

     

    Can that really keep going? I am very suspect of that. And yet look at the stock prices and valuations for Google, Apple, Facebook, Netflix and compare to Ford, IBM, Alcoa. 

  10. In the 20th century economic growth came from Housing, Infrastructure and Manufacturing. 

     

    We know where manufacturing went, we know that there is no infrastructure spending to speak of, and here's the housing starts chart,.

    Bond-Housing-Starts-041920-lg.gif

     

    Today, too much of the growth economy (based on stock prices) is nothing but internet adverts, cheap handheld computers and entertainment. 

    I'm not sure that will work.

  11. The historic oil price chart looks like a mountain range. It's a very volatile commodity. First, because actual reserves are essentially held in secret by the producing nations, and second, because the main players can very easily manipulate the market. This produces huge swings in the price. So, just as fast as it fell from 100 to 35, it can soar back to 100 again. It produces lots of new winners and new losers in each cycle. I wouldn't count on oil staying where it is now. 

  12. If you choose to ignore the warning signs that's up to you.
     

     

    Unless the popular mainline media provide the warnings, people will never listen to individual experts. The media can not provide a warning because that would be in opposition to their own economic interests. Can you just try to imagine mainline media saying, "This is not the time to finance a new house or car!" No, you can not. And, they never will. At best, they will report a little bit by looking in the rear view mirror. Looking ahead? No.

     

    The entire global economy is overleveraged. And, NO ONE wants to take a haircut of any kind. They all keep blowing the bubble higher by inventing a new financial product - a new derivative - while unable to expand the real economy, the one that makes desirable and necessary objects for life. You could visualize it like this: all the world's largest financial interest are at the poker table. The round of raises keeps circling the table, and each guy is borrowing (or simply printing) more money for the next raise. Eventually, like it or not, the raises must end, and the hands must be shown. Since all the raises were IOUs - simple debt instruments - the new "winner" has won nothing real, and all the other players have gone bankrupt. 

×
×
  • Create New...