Tyson68 Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 I'm trying to help out someone in another forum: http://www.dsmtalk.com/forums/showthread.php?s=12ad0d83100e6744eba6e1dc17c80a20&threadid=95608 I'm still dumbfounded by his remark about the RF-7's: >RF-7's lack some midrange realism to me. I do like there dynamics alot. I always thought that midrange realism was directly related to the source material. Use the wrong microphone and NOTHING will sound realistic, regardless of amp and speaker combo. Even in an A/B compare, if one set of speakers has 'midrange realism' and the other doesn't, which is the correct representation of the recording? If the recording was biased against realism (and I know this before the a/b compare) then that would mean the speaker that showed 'realism' was tweaking/coloring the sound, correct? I know that listening to speakers is subjective, and not everyone will hear the same thing from them, i'm just opening the theory box to get some logical answers/discussion on this. When you have Forte II's that make crap recordings sound like crap and great recordings sound great you tend to get crazy with the ?'s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.