Center Speaker for KSP-400's Wanted

[Dan Salden]

I just purchased a pair of KSP-400's. The manual indicates that I should use the KSP-C6 for a center speaker. Unfortunately this speaker has been discontinued. The speaker matching chart (on the Klipsch web page) indicates RC-3's as a match, but this chart is undated--so I don't know which suggestion precedes the other. What would be the best match? I am interested if anyone has a KSP-C6 for sale or knows where I might locate one. If so, please contact me! I am currently using an SC-1, which I obtained when I bought a pair of SF-1's in December. Fortunately, at that time I also got a pair of KSP-S6's--not knowing I would upgrade so soon!! FYI I am currently testing an Integra DTR 9.1 receiver (the upgrade for the Onkyo DS989), which the dealer loaned me. If I bite :-), I may also be looking for a pair of rear effect speakers (the S6's become the surround speakers and are placed along the side of the room--according to Onkyo's manual). Any help would be sincerely appreciated. Thanks.

[BLOOMIS914]

Dan, keep posting for the C6 Center, there are many floating around on this BB. You probably already got some private messages or e-mails. Good luck, I too was in the market for the C6 but I decide on the Legends KLF-20's, C7, KSW-15 and S6 surrounds. I was very impressed with the BASS form the 400's WOW. Good luck.

[Dan Salden]

Thanks for your response. I was hoping that I might receive some more feedback concerning the relative merits of the KSP-C6 speaker versus the RC-3 (which is listed as the matching speaker--probably because the C6 is no longer in production). With such "rapid" turnover in regard to series "in" production and "out," it is difficult to plan a HT system. I have not heard from anyone regarding the availability of a KSP-C6. None are currently being offered on the auction block (ebay, etc.). However, I suspect that this is the way I'll go (getting the C6 over the RC-3). Of course, if I purchase the Integra DTR-9.1 receiver, I'll also have to choose rear effects speakers--using my S6's as the side surrounds. Oh, is there ever an end?!!:confused:

[Drew Morgan]

I have the 400's too. I could (and still can) get the C-6 but I wanted the Mohoganny finish--which is only on the C-7. It too is a good match--with a little timber adjustment.

I'm in CA and the Good Guys can still order me one if I want so you may be able to get one there. I've also seen them for sale around here.

I'd personnaly stay away from the RC-3? I had that one with the copper cone--and returned it for the C-7. A much beter match I thought.

The side speakers you are referring to are designed for just that--to be mounted on the sides since they are difuse radiating speakers. The new Onkyo wants two additional rear speaker for the matrix rear channel, as I recall. The new Denon 58000 is going to utilize two additional rear discrete channels--something you may want to consider. But I would think a good direct radiating speaker would be better--if they're good. THX wants di-poles so they can control the "average" home theaters sound. If you do it right, scrap the THX and go for direct radiating speakers in the rear--and sides?

I personaly think that 3 in the front and 2 in the rear is more than enough. But the speaker manufacturers--and amplifier companies--along with dts encoders would have us all believe differently--to sell more equipment?

[Dan Salden]

Thanks for the comments, Drew. I finally located a KSP-C6 by canvasing Klipsch's Dealer Locator section of the BB. Along the way, I also located some KSP-S6's. So they are out there if you look hard enough. Unfortunately, I think that some dealers recognize the scarcity, and this is reflected in their tendencies to ask for manufacturer's suggested retail prices. I do want to thank all who responded to my questions. Interestingly, I never heard from anyone with Klipsch concerning C6 vs. RC-3.

I have not made a decision concerning the need for a new receiver--and if "yes," which one It seems every manufacturer has a different concept about 7-channel. The more a person asks, the more confusing it gets (not unlike the time when I first began exploring computers!). Most recently, a local installer asked why I would want something as expensive as an Integra DTR-9.1 or Yamaha RX-V1 when something less expensive would probably more than satisfy my needs. He probably has a point--I suspect many of us are "driven" by the quest for "bigger, better, and unfortunately, costlier." His suggestion was to look into a Pioneer 908 or maybe a Pioneer Elite (they have 3 EX, THX, "7-Channel" models). I am not sure what kind of 7-Channel sound is offered here. Does anyone have experience with elite Pioneers? These models are $700-2000 less expensive than the Onkyo or Yamaha (retail).

I recognize there are numerous Denon supporters on this BB. Unfortunately, I have not heard a Denon receiver (such as the 5800), and none of the dealers that I've been working with carry them. Hence, I don't have a basis for comparison. Ditto for those who suggest going the route of separate components (e.g., Sunfire). Sure it would be nice, but I don't have circa $5000 to spend, and if I did, I might prefer to look toward a HD-ready monitor (I am primarily video oriented).

Maybe this will start a new dialog on HT. Specifically, a dialog focusing not necessarily on the merits of various brand names, but rather on the issue of a good HT system versus HT system overkill. Let's face it, sometimes the decision for a heavyweight item leads to the need for 4, 5, or more other items in order to take advantage of it. I don't know about you folks out there, but I really can't afford it. My KSP-400 purchase has lead to the potential purchase of (or at least consideration of) 3 new Klipsch speakers, a new receiver, maybe a new HDTV, and possibly a progressive scan DVD! Ah,"For want of a nail...." In addition to this, I now have a "backup" HT system of SF-1's, SC-1, and KSW-100! How many homes need a Multiplex?!

[blklab]

please check your mail