Jump to content

Zealot125

Regulars
  • Posts

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Zealot125

  1. In other words, a hit song may make me buy

    the album, but it's the other songs on the album that will keep me

    playing it.

    Couldnt have said it better myself. But dont be too quick to

    judge MP3s on that one experience. You dont even know what enoder

    was used, nor at what bitrate. Though I agree with uninvolving

    aspect of low-quality MP3s my original objective was just to let people

    know that to my virgin ears (if you will), I cannot tell the difference

    between a well encoded MP3 at a high VBR, and the real thing.

  2. "Midrange reproduction was accurate and crisp, but bass was severely

    lacking, which is surprising given the Reference series significant

    cabinet depth. Perhaps its horn tweeter system is so strong that the

    woofers are simply overpowered. Whatever the cause, there is a

    noticeable hole in their frequency response and a powered subwoofer is

    a definite necessity with the Klipsch Reference speakers I reviewed.

    The lack of bass problem notwithstanding, the Reference series speakers

    have exceptional dynamic range."

    I dont know what they listened to, but I KNOW that when set up correctly, RF-7s will knock the snot out of your nose with bass.

  3. What you say:

    [:@]

    I called my Klipsch dealer and asked

    to see how much would it cost to get two THX 120 passive subs and the

    matching THX 1000 amp,to my surprise they said they cannot get the THX

    series! This is utter garbage,I will not travel and buy from another

    place.

    So if anyone at Klipsch could PM me,I want these subs and

    will buy them with the amp if I can from my Klipsch dealer.If I cannot

    I will not buy them and go with dual SVS PB2-Ultra(yes two PB2-Ultra

    subs).

    So Klipsch what will it be,I want to give you guys a

    chance.As a long time Klipsch customer I deserve better than a "WE

    CANNOT GET THX subs because only THX authorised dealers can sell

    them".

    What I hear:

    "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!"

    Sorry, couldnt resist. [:P] In your heart you know that you want the THX subs. I call your bluff.

  4. wav format seems to be ok with me, no comprimise in

    audio quality in my opinion

    I would hope that everyone here shares that opinion. WAV is

    uncompressed, uncompromised music, which is exactly what was on the

    cd. It doesnt get any more accurate from a CD source.[;)] In

    comparison, both FLAC and Apple Lossless are at the same quality level

    as wavs, but they take up less space.

  5. Apple has a compression called "apple lossless" which is another of the

    good compressors out there. Whether it is native or not, I dont know; I

    dont have a mac. Anyways like FLAC it is lossless.

    Also, ont he topic of VBRs I really dont follow your logic. The

    way the algorithm was explained to me, it only uses a lower bitrate

    when it would be impossible for the listener to discern the degradation

    in quality. In extemely simplified terms, it could be loosely

    compared to instead of recording silence in the music, telling how long

    that there should be silence. Not sure if that is accurate or

    understandable, but this chart on hydrogenaudio claims that V0 (preset

    --extreme) encoded with LAME are pretty much exactly the same quality

    as 320 kbps CBR, but takes up less space.

    http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME

  6. The thing is, I have a fileserver "in the sky" consisting of around 750

    GB storing music, movies, tv shows, data, and everything in

    between. I have plenty of space. I wholeheatredly agree

    that OGG is better compression with better quality, but with my

    investement in an Ipod, I must make due with MP3s. In the future,

    I will end up ripping all of them with FLAC as well, just for archival

    purposes, but for the sake of having high quality music wherever I go,

    MP3 VBR with LAME is the best one can do with an Ipod.

  7. Well, Im going to have to take a rian check on the orchestral

    comparison, as his HT is unavailible at the moment. However, on a

    side note, I compared MP3s encoded at 320 kbps CBR by the windows MP3

    encoder with LAME encoded VBR MP3's ripped with the "preset --extreme"

    setting (VBR b/t 192 and 320kbps). Frankly, I was stunned by the

    quality transition my the LAME encoder. I was able to pick out

    the LAME MP3 every time in a self-blind test. Well, its time to

    re-rip all of my MP3s. The VBRs even save space!!!

  8. Well, I took it upon myself to do some blind comparisons using a

    friends music room. For the sake of purity, we kept all testing

    conditions constant, including household noise. We listened on a

    2.1 setup 2 RF-7's and a RSW-15 run of of a Denon (3801 or 4801,

    something like that, not exactly sure right now) at identical volumes

    and listening distances one person at a time. MP3's were ripped

    with Exact Audio Copy utilizing LAME encoding at 320 kb/sec CBR sample

    rate and VBR sample rate varying between 128 and 320 kb/sec.

    Audition music was various tracks from Dream Theater's Six Degrees of

    Inner Turbulence, Steely Dan Aja, The Very Best of Chicago, Alice in

    Chains Greatest Hits, The Best of Blood Sweat and Tears. After

    blind testing, it is now apparent to me without any analyses whatsoever

    that the results are completely random. I can see no trends

    whatsoever. This either means that we are inexperienced

    listeners, or that there is little or no audible difference unless you

    were a music connoisseur with an anechoic chamber with Khorns on an

    amazing amp. I would be happy to perform a T-test to rule out any

    significance in the data. May not be an extremely scientific

    experiment, but it proved a point to me.

  9. So given the choice, you would take two of these THX subs over two

    RSW-15s right? Would either set be more musical than the

    other? I am assuming that the THXs will go lower, but which

    sounds *better*. I have no way of actually listening to either

    (alone or side-by-side) so I must go by all of your collective wisdom.

  10. You dont need the media center edition to rip dvds....look for a piece

    of software called DVD Decrypter. Sony sued the guy who developed

    it, so the only version that is still availible for download is

    outdated, but it has worked for all of the DVDs that I have thrown at

    it. Eventually, a new copy protection will render it useless, but

    for now, it works. The DVD decryter rips dvds into an IFO and a

    VOB file. Then download a program called Auto Gordian Knot, which

    will encode these files into an avi file, which is basically a

    compressed version of the movie. You can decide what kind/how

    much compression, or you can give the program a target like 75% quality

    of the original DVD (still looks a thousand times sharper than VHS) and

    it will encode accordingly. This process is not particularly

    user-friendly, so if you dont feel confident with configuring these

    programs, then it is not for you.

    Also, in order to work as a TIVO, you will need 1 or 2 TV tuner cards

    (nvidia makes a great one). You'll need 2 if you want to be able

    to record a program and watch another at the same time. Again,

    the special edition is not actually REQUIRED, its just user-friendly.

  11. i thought it sound better. less boomy and tighter

    with it turned around. then was telling me it made no sense to hve the

    passive firing backwards. obviously he knew nothing. there are mayn

    subs that have ports in the back and sound fine. a passive rad is no

    different.

    This may be beside the point, but I do belive the Passive rad on the

    RSW 15 is on the front and the active driver does fire backwards "into

    the wall" if you will. There may be a reason, but correct me if I

    am wrong.

×
×
  • Create New...