Jump to content

CallMeJoe

Regulars
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CallMeJoe

  1. I had a similar problem with a KG-5.2. I found a small section of the rubber surround had come loose from the woofer basket.

    I removed the woofer, carefully pried the black plastic trim ring off the front of the woofer and resecured the surround with some white glue I had left over from replacing the foam surrounds on a pair of JBL L-26s.

    I'm not sure of the exact type of glue; it came with the surrounds purchased from Rick Cobb (looneytune2001 on eBay) .

  2. ...I had to do reglue the motorboard/side cabinet on a KG 5.5 once. Must have been the glue used at the time.

    It appears they used a hot glue that did not age well.

    Out of curiosity, what glue did you use? I've used Titebond III for my recent wood projects, but I cut my panels to a closer fit than the KG 3.5 motorboard and rear baffle. Would an expanding glue such as Gorilla be better, or should I just use Titebond and then RTV the seams?

  3. I had my doubts since the glue's grip on the basket had been so persistent, but I set the woofer face down on some newspapers and started to work at the edge of the rubber ring with my fingernail. It took a brief effort to get it started and then it peeled off the cone very smoothly. Either they use a different adhesive on the cone than they do on the basket or the adhesive they use doesn't bind nearly so well to the ICG cone as to the steel basket.

    Thanks for the tip.

  4. I recently purchased a set of KG 3.2s and found one of the woofers (K-1002-K) had a jagged 4 cm tear in the rubber surround. I found a suitable replacement surround and managed to pry off the plastic trim ring and remove the surround from the woofer frame, but the cone edge presents a different problem - the rubber is bonded far better than the foam surrounds I have encountered on previous woofer repair jobs.

    Can anyone recommend a solvent to soften the glue without damaging the ICG cone material?

    Toluene? Acetone? MEK?

  5. Searching for a different woofer problem, I found this thread and realized I never responded.

    Woofer rattle is cured and the KG 5.2s have been playing merrily for the last 21 months. I have just moved them to a secondary system since I completed my Faux Forte II cabinets and moved those to primary stereo duty. I shall be tearing down the 5.2s soon to check cabinet integrity, as I recently found the baffles separating on my 3.5s and want to ensure the 5.2s are sound. While out of service I shall also refresh the cabinets by restoring some battered corners and laying on a fresh red oak veneer.

    Thanks again for the advice.

  6. Apologies for the NecroThread, but I just found this and am truly impressed by your concept and execution. It inspires me to start watching for a set of LaScalas myself!

    ...That old piece of ply is also the port shelf, notice the rails are 15" apart and the area between them it 10-5/8 long.

    I note you give precise horizontal dimensions for your port slot, but no vertical figure...
  7. Fresh to the Forums.

    I very recently bought a pair of RF-62 speakers and an RC-62. My question is. When Klipsch says the speaker sizes are 6.5" woofers.. Why do mine only measure out to be only 5.75"?

    I'm guessing you measured the speaker cone at 5.75"; the 6.5" figure is a "nominal" size, typically measured across the speaker basket.

  8. >They must have been equalized
    in the preamps, since the equalization was to correct for the spectral
    character of the microgroove albums. As you surmise, there were vastly
    different qualities of RIAA curve implementation.

    I
    disagree. I have a considerable number of early microgroove records
    and they do not exhibit "vastly different" curves. For one thing, the
    curves were based on a number of physical issues that yielded pretty
    much the same curve no matter who calculated it. The curve was set in
    stone in 1955, but previous LP's were already close enough for the
    playback to be correct already. In fact, as I go back through recorded
    history it is only in the 30's that significant variants begin to be
    heard.

    Dave


    Mea Culpa; I stated that poorly. Recording companies were relatively consistent in implementation of the recording curve. It was the playback curve that was poorly implemented by some hardware manufacturers.

  9. I offer for example the Pat-5 Bi-FET , phono input " High -- Low switch " please elaborate on what it's function must be ?


    Phono Input Acceptance:

    LO: Greater than 115 millivolts at 1 KHz.

    HI: Greater 45 millivolts at 1 KHz


    Impedances:


    Magnetic Phono: 47,000 ohms in parallel with 220 pF.

    High level: 50,000 ohms http://home.indy.net/~gregdunn/dynaco/components/PAT5/index.html

    That is a High/Low Gain switch, giving an additional 6 dB of amplification in the "High" position. It has nothing to do with cartridge compliance. The impedances noted are for two different sets of inputs, the Phono (Low level) and Aux, Tuner, etc. (High Level); also not compliance related.

    You can find a passable primer on phono cartridge compliance here at Galen Carol Audio (the first link I found through Google)http://www.gcaudio.com/resources/howtos/tonearmcartridge.html' title="here">.

  10. 1) Were there stereo ceramic pickups? Maybe.

    Yes, there were.

    2) When a preamp had an input for ceramic, did the preamp use RIAA
    equalization? That might change with the sophistication of the preamp.

    They must have been equalized in the preamps, since the equalization was to correct for the spectral character of the microgroove albums. As you surmise, there were vastly different qualities of RIAA curve implementation.

    Low compliance or High compliance for properly implementing the "RIAA curve" for phonograph input, Impedance matching (Z)

    Compliance is a mechanical characteristic of the cartridge's stylus and cantilever. It has nothing to do with RIAA curve or electrical impedance.

  11. Find yourself the microscope that was made and sold for kids that connects to your usb port and allows you to use your monitor as the display.

    It has an amazing ccd and will more than adequately work. The cartridge rebuilder in Georgia swears by this.

    You can find them occaisonally in garage sales as I picked one up for $5.

    There are drivers available up to XP. I have not tried it on win7 or linux yet.

    I think that may be the Intel QX3 (Play) microscope I mentioned earlier in the thread. It only goes to 200X magnification, but I still find it useful for stylus work.
×
×
  • Create New...