Also, just curious how much were these Forte's brand new and what can you get them for now, because for the money I think the RF-3's are awfully hard to beat.
I have owned my Stero-link for about 6 months and love it. I have all my mp3's at 320 going to a Yamaha RX-V1000, RP-3's, RF-3's, and a Velodyne SPL12. Wow, to lazy to even use the cd Player anymore.
How about the Forte's compared to the RF-3? Just curious, I own RF-3's but have never heard Forte's (I or II) or the Hersey for that matter. I guess I was just wondering how these older speakers compare to something I'am familar with (RF-3's) which I love by the way.
I took a look and because of proper speaker placement, which was different than I thought, I will get the RS-3's and the RF-3's. RS-3's for surround and RF-3's for Main (. Thanks for the help.
This is what I was thinking
Main (a) RP-3's ( RF-3's
center- RC-3
surrounds- RS-3's
Sub-Velodyne SPL12
Then I started to think maybe I could just save some money and use my RF-3's for the Main (b's) and the surround's, since it's easy enough to move the banana plug.
But the question is would the RS-3's do a better job as the surrounds. I don't want to add a sub. My velodyne pounds and I have
2 10"'s in the RP-3's.
Thanks
Thanks for the reply. I use my system about 50/50 for HT and music, also I have found I prefer to listen to my music in 2 channel stereo, but maybe this is because I really have not listened in 5.1 very often.
Music is as important as HT to me.
Also my reciever is the Yamaha RX-V1000
I have:
Mains-RP-3's
Center-RC-3
Sub-Velodyne SPL12
My question is, think I should get the RF-3's for the surrounds or the RS-3's?
Would the RF-3's be alot better
I have:
Mains-RP-3's
Center-RC-3
Sub-Velodyne SPL12
My question is, think I should get the RF-3's for the surrounds or the RS-3's?
Would the RF-3's be alot better