Jump to content

CANT

Regulars
  • Posts

    385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CANT

  1. My first question is does the orientation of the radiator affect its performance (or anything else)? I dont mean where on the box either I mean with the spider on interior of the box or on the exterior. I cant think of anything right off the bat that would affect the performance either way but there may be an issue with spider resonance or something? Second, If you were to mount the radiator with the spider on the exterior of the cabinet how might the opening affect its performance. I.E. mounting a 12in radiator over a 10in opening or a 4in opening? It might also be helpful to know this idea is in reference to woofer and not a subwoofer Thank you in advance for your assistance.
  2. Thank you to everyone who replied. I ended up picking up a pair of 76's on ebay for just shy of $40... So no I am off to sort out my crossovers... but that is for another post.
  3. I definitely appreciate the offer and can more than understand wanting to make your money back but the amount you are asking for is more than I would like to spend at this time... On a side note: I do have some extra parts if any wants to trade? 1 - T2A 1 - K53 Assy 1 - K22 2 - K400 (horns only)
  4. I'm still looking but will probably have to wait until after Xmas to pull the trigger so if anyone else has a pair of tweeters let me know... If I can't find anything by them I'll probably just start looking into the aftermarket (Eminence, Selenium, Beyma, etc.)?
  5. I would prefer to purchase them both at once but if I can't find a pair I will take you up on the single unit Gregg... Thank you for the replies, -J
  6. I've recently acquired a pair TH-SR-2's and would like to and a tweeter to them. All of the tweeters I can find on ebay are going for way too much as far as I'm concerned...
  7. ...while I was not a fan of using the PX in both positions this might be a great set up for someone who finds their speaker too bright and would like more midrange focus?
  8. I have actually read over the Humble write up a couple times. It's quite helpful. Actually the last time I looked at it I noticed this: Clarity Cap SA MKP 630VDC 5% tolerance Sound: The Clarity Cap range has an overall similarity in tonal balance, going up the range you gain a bit in clarity and spatiality. I find the SA to be neutral with a slightly warmish presentation but also a bit closed-in. Compared to the Clarity Cap PX definition and separation are better, the stereo-image is also little larger. I did find the top end to be slightly rolled-off, not that they lacked detailed but on some recordings I wanted a fraction more transparency - but all in all still very nice. On the downside the "S" and "T" in vocals can be a bit plasticy, this is probably due to the lack in transparency in the top octave, making the octaves below sound a little masked. Making a capacitor using about 90% Clarity Cap SA and about 10% Mundorf Supreme works very well, this tends to open up the top end just nicely without altering anything else. While he is talking about the SA line this does come fairly close to validating what I noticed with the lower PX line. I am also wondering if using more than one in series (eg. 3rd order network) compounds this flaw as I did not notice the issue, almost at all, when testing these capacitors in series with other brands. I actually liked using the PX in the 3uf position with a standard MCAP, which I also tested. The MCAP is a much brighter cap. An issue that I believe also gets compounded when used in both the 3uf and 8uf position. The two together seem to marry well though I'm not sure how much better this set up is compared to the Daytona/Bennic 1% caps I had in before I this wild testing hair appeared. In fairness though none of my test setups have/had near enough burn-in to fully judge them... I would still like to hear some of the other budget cap lines like the Janzten Standard-Z and Audyn Q4...
  9. A while back I replaced the capacitors in my KG4's with Daytona 1%'s which seemed like and was a fitting replacement at the time but I recently decided to try a different cap since I had a couple Clarity PX lying around. I was quite surprised by the difference... I had figured I might notice a difference between the Daytonas and something a bit higher end but thought the PX would be more or less identical? I was wrong... just not in a good way? Despite the PX seemingly superior build quality and Clarity's reputation, to me, they have an unpleasant midrange forward quality and lack the openness of the Daytonas. They make the KG4's sound flat and cheap? I was so befuddled I tried them in my KG1.2's as well, with a similar change in sound? I am now trying to figure out if any one else has noticed this or if it's just my ears or if these are bad caps? There is quite a bit of info out there comparing Daytona, Standard-Z, QS, PX and MCAPs to more expensive caps but little info comparing them to ea other? Any info could prove useful? Thank you for you time.
×
×
  • Create New...