Jump to content

prodj101

Regulars
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3010

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by prodj101

    I'm finally content with my two channel system (v. finished speakers)

    in 2-Channel Home Audio

    Posted

    They're actually 7 inch drivers, but all the other info is correct. The

    bass extension is exceptional. While they're obviously not as loud as

    RF-5's, they have better low end extension (I don't need a sub at all

    with them, except for things like pomps and pipes). They're a bit more

    laid back, but I kind of like that. I used better crossover components

    than those found in the factor models, so the mid and high detail is a

    little bit better.

    JT, thanks for mentioning the bigger old mcintosh amps...somehow I had completel yforgotten they existed [:$]

    I'm finally content with my two channel system (v. finished speakers)

    in 2-Channel Home Audio

    Posted

    Over the long weekend, I finally got around to putting the finishing

    touches on my DIY Proac Response 2.5's...What can I say but amazing?

    Though for home theatre I'd give the edge to the old RF-5's, due to the

    efficiency and sheer power, for music, hands down Proacs...They sound

    absolutely incredible. They don't look bad with the red maple either.

    Unfortunately as I'm typing this, I'm starting to think about upgrading

    my preamp and amp...oh well, what can you do.

    post-10107-13819284079414_thumb.jpg

    Just finished my new computer sub...

    in Home Theater

    Posted

    Thanks...

    It is tuned to 31 hz. I have the promedia 2.1's and it absolutely

    destroys the sub in that system, and based on what I have heard of the

    5.1 sub (my friend owns that system) it does the same with that. One

    however, must take into account that it cost about $200 for just the

    parts, and you don't get any satilites, amps for those sats and

    whatever else. Because I tuned it so low and in such a large enclosure,

    it's not particularily loud, but it makes up for this in cleanliness,

    as well as low end extension. The RSW-15 is definitely superior, but

    this sub actually sounds much more neutral/flat, and is just as

    enjoyable to listen to for music (which is where it is needed).

    This computer setup is used for mixing/recording music.

    updated cabin home theatre system pictures.

    in Home Theater

    Posted

    They are RF-5's. And you are correct in saying that this gear was set up in my bedroom at my house in the city before. I aquired a pair of Proac Response 2.5's so those are now in use in my room (I easily prefer them to the RF's for 2 channel music). While the front line of the system is nice and uniform, the back is not. For the time being, I have 2 garbage RCA bookshelf speakers and a Kef center channel for the rear center position. Nothing special, but they get the job done for now. If I can work this summer I think I'll throw in a better DVD player and perhaps some RS-25's. Until then, it's good enough for me.

    Attatched is a picture of the cabin exterior.

    post-10107-13819266368912_thumb.jpg

    Anybody here use Proac Response 2.5's?

    in General Klipsch Info

    Posted

    I recently aquired a pair that I am now using with Mcintosh amplification.... I have to say I am completely stunned at how far superior they are to the RF-5's along with the RSW-15. They are superior in essentially ever way other than max volume and sensitivity...but with good amplification in my tiny room that's not really an issue. I would definately reccomend them to anyone thinking of making an upgrade from any of the current klipsch products, even the RF-7's.

    Sealed or ported?

    in Home Theater

    Posted

    Sealed and ported woofers have different extension types, not so much better or worse. Sealed woofers typically have a more gradual roll off, so if it's rated to 30 hz, it will gradually become softer from then on. Ported subwoofers typically have a sharp roll off, so from after 30 hz you'd get very little performance. Sealed subwoofers will also typically be more clean sounding, but it is very posssible to have a ported subwoofer that will perform comporably, you'll just have to spend a little more.

    $7K = Which Processor & Amps..?

    in Home Theater

    Posted

    Just out of curiousity, why are you mixing the THX Ultra 2 line with the Reference series? If you're going to be using this system for primarily movies (which it seems like you are) you'd get better performance from an all THX Ultra system. I realize that the 525's are only surrounds, but it is typically desireable to have a system that is 100% timber matched, which is what you would yield from either an all reference system or all THX system, not to mention it won't look goofy 9.gif .

    As for seperates, I too would reccomend B&K because I have a preamplifier made by them and I have been satisfied with it. However, with the amount of money your spending things like Krell and Sunfire are also highly acclaimed possibilities.

    Mere mention of Synergy turn you off???

    in Home Theater

    Posted

    ----------------

    On 12/29/2004 9:17:06 PM Steve_L wrote:

    I wouldn't know, but the F-3s sounded great to me against the other speakers I listened to in the same range; Paradigms, Polks, Saphhire and Bose, Boston Research.

    ----------------

    You merged two companies 3.gif . Boston Research is not a company, however Boston Acoustics and Acoustic Research are companies.

×
×
  • Create New...