Jump to content

sherman1125

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sherman1125

  1. I've been thinking of getting into HT via existing speakers. Would LaScala's in the front and KG5.2's in the rear be a good match? I would have to get a center speaker. I also have a set of Revel M20's but think the low sensativity wouldn't keep up with the LaScalas.

    John

  2. In a previous thread I stated my system components but left out, the leftovers from putting my present system togther. I was on a buying spree for awhile and have 3 sets of speakers, 2 amps, 2 preamps, and 2 cd players and one old Pioneer analog tuner from the 70's.

    Anyhoo, I picked up the KG 5.2's while visiting family in Ohio this past Christmas. I wanted to give them a try. (I hand't bought the LaScalas yet, just the Revels.)

    They sound fine even though they are a 2-way with a passive radiator. They could use more bracing which is the only real downside to them. No, they're not as precise in clarity as the Revels or LaScalas (only slightly) but for the money, they are a steal/deal. For someone on a reciever budget I would think this would be a great deal if you can still find them.

    Anyway, where did this series fit in to Klipsch's marketing? Was this the budget line? If so I'm very impressed.

    John

  3. Hello all. I have read this forum from time to time over the past year and noted that many of you run tube gear. Will a tube pre-amp and amp make that much of a difference in the sound quality or is it more of a percieved change?

    My gear consists of:

    Rega Planet 2000 cd

    Acurus RL-11 Pre-amp

    McCormack DNA-125 amp

    LaScala's and Revel M-20's for speakers

    I don't belive tube gear would run the Revels well.

    I swap out between the Klipsch and Revels at odd, long intervals.

    If the tube gear makes that much of a difference then I might consider selling the Revels.

    Thank you.

    John

×
×
  • Create New...