Cody_Mack Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 In the signal path I say quality is essential but what about the cap used for the woofer rolloff. I see that a much cheaper non-polarized electrolytic cap is often used in this application. Comments? Rick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4tay Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I replaced all the caps in my Forte II's and it was like taking the speakers from behind a curtain for the 1st time. That was before I installed the ti diaphragms. Bob Crites has stated that the larger caps are very spendy to replace, and as a blocking cap, aren't a big change, unlike changing the tweeters cap. The one thing it does seem to do is help prevent image drift. I can tell you, ditching the electrolytic caps made a difference in that from the mids on up. Look at the caps in the palladium xover...and you can see what Klipsch's opinion is of high end component use...(they didn't skimp) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerohm Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 The capacitor [type/quality] on the woofer low pass makes almost no difference considering how it meshes up against the mid-bandpass. I would be almost willing to say it makes absolutely NO audible difference whatsoever [to mere mortals anyway]. The woofer is already naturally rolling off and it only steepens the slope. If extreme slope configurations were the norm, I might have to re-evaluate MY opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.