bernmart Posted December 27, 2004 Share Posted December 27, 2004 I've owned a pair of the original Fortes for several years now, and love them. But Forte IIs seem to have a big following on the Forum. I understand on a bsic level the spec differences between the two--the IIs have a bigger passive woofer, and a different midrange horn--but in what ways do they sound different? I admit that this is pretty much a matter of curiosity, but I've never run into a Forte II owner so I could listen and judge for myself, so. . . . Thanks in advance, Bernie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 9 Posted December 28, 2004 Share Posted December 28, 2004 If you "search" back through previous posts you will find your question has been answered by some people here who have owned both. I own the Forte II but have not heard the Forte I. In general, the most common comparative observations has been that the Forte II goes noticeably a little deeper because of the passive radiator and sounds a little smoother in the mids because of the Tractrix horn. A tractrix, in theory, provides a more consistent wavefront than an exponential horn. Interestingly enough, there are some who prefer the Forte I's nontheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j-malotky Posted December 28, 2004 Share Posted December 28, 2004 I for one prefer the Forte 1. IMO, the 1 sounds more like vintage Heritage than the Forte 2. They both a kick butt speakers, but if your looking for an upgrade and get more sound, look into the Chorus, CornW, LAS, Belle, or khorn depending on your room. JM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.