Jump to content

CNET RC-25 Review


ct1615

Recommended Posts

"The RC-25's tonal balance is ever so slightly lightweight...We have one caveat: Avoid mating a bright or even slightly harsh receiver with the RC-25, which will highlight that weakness. Our setup involved first-class electronics, and our reference discs sounded awfully good. "

What is a bright receiver?????

For the full article go here

http://reviews.cnet.com/Klipsch_RC_25/4505-7869_7-30582947-2.html?tag=top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with their review. I had the opposite experience. I compared the RC25 (in my home) against the Boston Acoustics VRC, CSW MC300 and the Axion 150. I felt that the RC25 had a significant edge in bass response over the VRC and gave weight to vocals...very warm sounding. It also was not as bright as either the VP150 or the VRC. I gave the Klipsch the edge over the other centers based on it's "mid-range" warmth and dialogue inteligibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

i don't like cnet,

but an example of a bright receiver would be yamaha compared to an hk,

a yamaha reciever is a birghter sound in general than that of hk

as onkyo is brighter than hk as well. hk is a warmer sound.

i don't know if you can call a receiver bright unless you are comparing it to something that is not as bright...

i'm not sure if that makes total sense.

EDIT

Also be sure not to confuse "detailed" sound and brightness they are different!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response Grams. The writer (Steve Guttenburg) does a lot of work for HT magazine and I have enjoyed several of his articles. I just don't understand why you would leave that info out? You would not write a food review like that and state the best way to prepare a chicken kiev in with "good spices". Why are reviewers so scared to call out electronic manufacturers on their products?...yes I know sales $$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been said, but let me reiterate that Yahmaha builds bright recievers. I'm sure Yammys sound good on some other speakers, but I'm running a mid-entry level Yahmaha and it sounds pretty harsh in the high notes. Currently upgrading to a serious AVR. Stupid money...

Scott

P.S. I've been told that Denon recievers are a bit bright for Klipsch speakers as well; I haven't owned one, so I don't know, but I thought I'd pass the warning along. Anyone have personal experience?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------

On 2/6/2005 5:33:54 PM ottscay wrote:

P.S. I've been told that Denon recievers are a bit bright for Klipsch speakers as well; I haven't owned one, so I don't know, but I thought I'd pass the warning along. Anyone have personal experience?

----------------

I wouldn't call Denon receivers bright at all, in fact if anything Denon tweaks their receivers to sound overly warm an full, and therefore more powerful. Sort of like the old "loudness contour" setting that used to be popular in stero amps and receivers, except with no way to defeat it.

JR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...