storm300x

and actually liked them,not harsh as i have heard people so about horns so many times,maybe a tad bright but not harsh. The store was demoing the klf-30 with a cheap yamaha reiciever,knowing i had better electronics at home (plus they are being discountinued and were half off) i picked them up. Got them home nd really liked them,they have great dynamics with rock and country,and a nice midrange. I was expecting the bass to be too heavy also with 2 12" per speaker but it is nicely balanced. I'm still breaking them in,will report more as they open up.

main system: martin logan ascents adcom 1400 pre-amp rotel 971 hdcd cd player rel acoustics storm 3 subwoofer technics dvda-10 dvd-audio b&k st1400 amp transparent and aurelle dynamics rca straight wire speaker cable rca 38" 16x9 hdtv secondary: denon 2800 reciever b&w dm601 s2 playstation 2 dvd/cd/gaming straight wire speaker cable pc 1 monsoon mm-2000 pc 2 klipsch v.400

How many high end audio magazines review klipsch speakers? ummm.....0 Has klipsch ever been on Sterophile's list of recomended componets? nope,if they are so good why are they ignored by the major real hi-fi world?

there is a cure for the klipsch disease,its called Martin Logan.....

..should check out the Monsoon mm-2000. In my opinion it absoulty kills the Klipsch in midrange and high reproduction,no harshness only sweet planar sound. The sub isnt as loud but is much tighter and more defined,check them out if you like clean accurate sound. www.monsoonpower.com

i like the klipsch for non-serious gaming on my pc,but compared to my martin-logans the klipsch really,really suck