Jump to content

raeggis

Regulars
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by raeggis

  1. 28 minutes ago, MechEngVic said:

    I see two potential issues. First, isn't the chorus ii woofer crossing at 600hz? The Faital is rated up to 4000hz, sounds more like it's meant for a 2way. Second, it lists the ported box volume as 2.95ft3, I think the chorus is 6 or 7 cubic feet. That's what I remember having owned them many years ago. Correct me if I'm wrong. 

    Chorus bass is crossing at 600 hz

    Faital pro will do the same on Chorus. 

    The size of the speaker box should not be a problem.  Faital pro has almost similar measurement data as K-48

    Other brands that should work against K-48: Eminence Delta-15LF Eminence Kappa - 15 Eminence Kappa Pro 15 LF C

  2. 5 hours ago, PrestonTom said:

    To the OP and his original question, re-read what GLENS wrote in his first post. 

    Personally, I think you  are seeking a solution in search of a problem. The bass is fine on the Chorus. There are other things that I would tackle first. 

    Good luck,

    -Tom

    The first post is off topic. 

    Stop making trouble out of nothing, think positively and negatively when considering replacement bass speakers.  Feel free to make suggestions

    • Like 1
  3. 4 hours ago, jason str said:

    My speakers brain in the photo😀There are some off topic in this thread, but it is also interesting reading.  Faital Pro 15 PR 400 C 4 ohm vs K-48.  One thing is certain when switching between these bass drivers.  1. less watts and more bass.  2. Smoother frequency curve.  3. lighter membrane, which gives a faster response.  4. a better voice coil, for better cooling.  I have found only one drawback of this replacement speaker.  It is necessary to grind the outer diameter a little to fit the hole.

     

     

     

    IMG_20191210_190306.png

  4. 3 minutes ago, glens said:

     

    Rest what? Just different drivers on the horns or different horns too?  Because the drivers alone could alter the box volume, horns definitely so.

    New diaphgram on tweeter and mid horn😀 and new capacitors. 

    • Like 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, billybob said:

    Sounds like fun...Looked at your link and those Faital Pro look interesting at 8 pound weight.

    At 400 watt they're hard hitting and read like a decent replacement. The Eminence Kappa C is another used and mentioned here for optional. Looked for the specs on the K-48 but could not open, yet they can handle 100 watt continuous and 1000 Watt peaks.

    There are the kp and the EP.

    Out of my reference and memory frame.

    Know others will be chiming in...

    Yeah i like the pro speakers of Klipsch.  I think a doubble  K-48 will be right on chorus since the low spl on theme haha. 

  6. 23 minutes ago, billybob said:

    Understand...if you already have the other speakers, why not...if not it could get expensive.

    Used my Chorus like your recommendation for placement.

    Have you ever turned them up?

    Chest pounding bass aplenty.

     

     

    Yes I have several times with crazy sound pressure😀.  I only have the old basses, but the rest is new.

  7. 14 minutes ago, billybob said:

    The k-48 woofer used in the Chorus speakers are more than adequate for superb bass response, many have found.

    Always interesting to see what

    a different woofer  would make. 

    but...in this case!?

    Good fortune

    I totally agree as long as you use the back wall and side wall as bass reinforcement.  I'm reasonably happy with my speakers, but the idea of increasing the spl on the bass driver is there😀

    • Like 1
  8. 7 hours ago, pzannucci said:

    The only way to know is to take them apart again and try to reset them.  Sometimes you notice something in the process.  Also make sure you clean the slot for the voice coil.  I use post-its since they are a little sticky.  

    Problem solved 😀

    There was voice coil that was in contact with metal. I turned diaphragm 180 degrees. Then the stereo sound image came back.

    Should be able to buy new diapragm since there are minor damage to voice coil and the sound a little impaired on cymbals. This is my opinion compared to the other speaker.

  9. 21 minutes ago, pzannucci said:

    Take them apart and reset them.  It is easy for the diaphragms to get set in the slot wrong when reassembling.  As for the 5.3 vs 5.5, I wouldn't think it is a drastic difference, enough to hear though you should check each component before soldering to insure something isn't messed up.

    I want to double check if diaphragm runs freely. Is there any good method to get this checked?

  10. 13 minutes ago, Deang said:

    What do you mean by "midrange elements"?

     

    Did you replace the diaphragms for both the midrange and tweeter, or just the tweeter?

     

    Reheat all of the solder joints on the crossovers (and add a bit of solder while doing so).

    I replaced all diaphragms. 

    Elements is diaphragms. 

    I Will do as you say Deang 😀 Thanks for your response. Cheers

     

  11. There are new Titanium and mid-range elements in both speakers. Only bass elements that are original. Measured speakers on terminals of different value. One speaker plays much higher than the other. what is wrong?

     

    The speaker that plays the highest has a measurement of 5.5 ohms. The lowest player has a measured value of 5.3 ohms.

    Desibel difference is about 6 decibels.

     

    Speakers are swapped side to rule out amplifier problems.

  12. On 29.4.2016 at 4:39 PM, istics said:

    So I love my heresy ii's and my forte II's but I cant afford that nice tube amp yet so I am always looking for a way to lower the output of the tweeter and skwaker in both speaker sets as they are both a bit forward with my current solid state AV amp. Now I know that the answer is a better amp and that is coming!!!! but for the time being I was wondering if anyone has used L pads to attenuate the tweeter and skwaker of either of the 2 sets of speakers I own?

     

    If anyone has used them, how did it sound? did you use fixed or variable L pads? Where did you get them or who makes quality ones? or if fixed  was used what value resistors were used?

     

     

    Thanks guys

    Bryan

     

    IMG_20180501_125153.png

  13. 10 hours ago, Maximus89 said:

    I never tried it in the Chorus II. The universal can't be used with the Chorus II.  I sold the La Scalas along with the crossovers.  Still have the Chorus II.  My regret is that i sold both pairs of La Scalas when i should have kept 1 pair, but i love my Chorus II and hoping i can get some money saved up and get crossovers from DeanG.

    I have installed Bobs repair kit , and will test mid and tweeter with resistors (L-pad).

  14. 56 minutes ago, geoff. said:

    raeggis, thanks for the link!

     

    Here is a screenshot for when this one disappears into the darkweb too. Lol

    FB063495-CEA3-4088-883F-9A8D8BBC3A9D.png

    I have tested signal generator from bass to mid , and mid to high. I get the same tone at 600 Hz. The result from mid to high was 6000 Hz on Chorus II

  15. 47 minutes ago, pzannucci said:

    That is fine, I was just trying to figure out what specs you were referencing were wrong, where you were looking at the specs (web page).  The pointers in this thread point to several pages and I found the cut sheets which didn't list the crossover points from Klipsch.

     

    Since the crossovers are basically the same (very close) on a number of the line,  if the speakers are up in the efficiency of the KLF 30 / Chorus II with almost the exact same components, it seems most of the listed crossovers for the tweeter are 7K.  Same crossover components on the tweeter and natural rolloff on the midrange sans crossover.  Can a little measurement variation or evaluation account for a 1K difference?  Possibly but I don't references so can't verify.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20120422070407/http://www.klipsch.com/chorus-ii-floorstanding-speaker

×
×
  • Create New...