Chris A Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I have noticed that many 2-channel enthusiasts like to use the wide dimension of the room as the front (ref., PWK's 3-channel configuration with corner Khorns and a center Belle/La Scala/Cornwall/Heresy), while most 5.1/7.1 setups characteristically use the short wall for the front, using the surround speakers abreast or behind the listening positions to reinforce ambience and to keep the listening positions away from being too close to the walls. This would indicate that there are probably different opinions over the relative dimensions (length x width x height) of an ideal room between primarily 2-channel and 5.1/7.1 applications. For instance, consider an example room with relative dimensions: 1.6 x 2.6 x 1 to avoid dealing with potentially nasty room modes piling up on one another. Room modes play havoc with the size, number and placement of subwoofers, the placement of good listening positions, and with in-room EQ of mid-bass frequencies. The minimum desirable physical room dimension is probably something greater than 9 feet (~2.7 m, usually height...but not always) ) because of precedence effects and room reflections (unless you made the room into an anechoic chamber, which isn't very desirable IMHO). This would give us a minimum-sized room of 14.4 x 23.4 x 9 feet (4.4 x 7.1 x 2.7 m). Would you 2-channel guys still try to use the long dimension as the front wall in this example? Does anyone believe that it is better to use a room's wide dimension as the front in their HTs? Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artto Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 It’s an interesting dilemma that I’m sure even a lot of usold timers are encountering, including myself. I guess it depends on what your priorities are, and whatkind of seating capacity/arrangement is required by you. With HT I like the idea of having more space behind mesimply because of the 5-7 channel thing, so using the short wall as the “front”may be preferable. But it will certainly “shrink the stage” for musicalperformance. I my case, I have no intention of using the room as a hometheater with more than me, my wife and our dog, and maybe one or two morepeople, pretty much the same as with music, so the main speakers will mostlikely stay on the long wall. If your needs require a larger HT audience fromtime to time, then you might prefer the main speakers on the shorter wall somore people have the proper “view”, along with the rear speakers not beingimmediately behind their ears. And don’t forget, the recommendation that the speakers beplaced on the long wall, emanates from the typical size and proportions encounteredin most residences. On the other hand, if the room is quite large, say 30’x40’,the short wall will probably be very adequate for the mains. You can have yourcake and eat it too. I really boils down to how much real estate can youafford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.