Jump to content

Would a RC-3 (rear) go with my RC-3II and RF-3II"s


zandern

Recommended Posts

Someone on this page is selling their RC-3 for $125. I thought it was a good deal. Anyways, I currenlty have a 5.1 setup, but my Denon 2802 allows DTS ES and NEO: 6. So I could go with the 6.1 set up. Would the older RC-3 go good as a center rear channel with my RF-3II's and RC-3II. Also does it also have the same size horn and 6" woofers as the II's or is it smaller. I know they have different wiring, but thats about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the only difference between an RC-3 'I' and an RC-3 II is that the 'II' version is internally wired with monster cable Z-series wire. I cannot imagine that would effect the sound that much. I would most certainly take that dude up on the $125 RC-3 to use as the rear center if I was in your situation 4.gif.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i'd definitely go for that. same sounding speak - no audible dif.

i did the same by adding in a C7as a rear center to my legends, cornwall sys. really was a great addition & filled in the gap between the surrounds great.

& you'll find that the denon plays rear center for any mode &/or format that uses the 5 speakers before, DD 5.1, DD EX, Prologic, dts 5.1 & es, & even 6 "channel"/speaker stereo. just as long as you set-up the speaker in the denon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the Denon 2802 also and was thinking of buying a single RS3-II for the back center....mainly because I can get it in white and it will match the surrounds...so does the rear center put out sound like the front center??

I was just wondering if it would sound diff. with a "center" speaker vs. a RS3-II.

thanks

RF3-II

RC3-II

RS3-II

Denon AVR 2802

Sub-still looking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could sound alittle different, but most people get the RS-3 just because it matches the other surrounds and maybe cheaper?? So you could definately go ahead with that since it would match much better. Infact I was looking at Sound and Vision magazine and when they tested the RF-7 set they used the RS-7 instead of the RC-7 for the rear center channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes there's both sides to whether to use a wdst like the rs instead of a direct like the rc. .6.gif lots of depends, but the best way would be to demo both in your room & see which you prefer w/ various material & modes.

one thing to keep in mind, if your receiver does dts 6.1 discrete, w/ more of that format out & coming, in that case the rear surround (6th channel) can contain entirely different sound/effects.

when a plane flys over your head, do you want it to go from the front center spot to all over the rear wall or maintain its direction in a direct radiating speak like an rc-3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good point boa, right now the position would be almost directly overhead in a 18x15 room. with the spread being about 14 ft, i am not sure if another rs would be right or if i could discern a direction with 3 rs' over me.

on the other hand, i would need a nasty tilt on the rc to get the direction i need. i just hate having an un-used channel. i guess something to look forward to in a bigger house.9.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...