Jump to content

Radioshack toslink? Should i change it ?


afraid

Recommended Posts

Does the Yamaha 595 support coax digital input on an RCA jack? If so, you might want to try using that rather than the TOSLINK connection. Lots of high end fuddy duddies ( ME Biggrin.gif ) think that the coax, probably as a result of the more extended bandwidth resulting in in phaseshift-induced jitter, sounds better than the relatively low bandwidth TOSLINK connection.

If you're lock into TOSLINK ( Wink.gif ) there's, like, a zillion alternatives at all sorts of price points. I just did a google search on the the string:

toslink digital cable

and got all sorts of on-line merchant sites.

Ray

------------------

Music is art

Audio is engineering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

to answer for ray: yes.

just pick up a rat shack gold series digital audio cable(what we like to call coax) for like $6.99 & see if you can hear a dif.

why spend another $40 for another optical cable? rat shacks are fine there too IMHO.

------------------

Klipsch KLF 30 (front), KLF C-7, Cornwall I (rear)

Velodyne HGS-18 sub woofer

Monsterbass 400 sub interconnects & Monster CX-2 biwire & Z-12 cable

Marantz SR-8000 receiver

Sony DVP-C650D cd/dvd player

Sony Trinitron 27" stereo tv

Toshiba hi-fi stereo vcr

Technics dual cassette deck

Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2000 digital cable box

Boa's Listenin Lounge:

Klipsch RF-3 (front), RC-3, cheap little Technics (rear)

Monster MCX Biwires

Sony STR-DE935 a/v receiver

Kenwood KR-9600 AM/FM stereo receiver (vintage 1975)

Russound AB-2 receiver switch to RF-3

Teac PD-D1200 5-disk cd changer

Technics direct drive turntable

Sega Genesis game player

Sub: None yet

rock on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

samuel, yes toslink & optical are same at least for this discussion. i was saying on another thread that this is one of the great "tastes great" - "less filling" debates. though there may be some measurable dif., i doubt highly it's an audible one. not for my comparisons definitely.

but jmo, don't want to get into it again Biggrin.gif

see the thread under i think general or HT "optical or coax" or something. you'll see many opinions.

------------------

Klipsch KLF 30 (front), KLF C-7, Cornwall I (rear)

Velodyne HGS-18 sub woofer

Monsterbass 400 sub interconnects & Monster CX-2 biwire & Z-12 cable

Marantz SR-8000 receiver

Sony DVP-C650D cd/dvd player

Sony Trinitron 27" stereo tv

Toshiba hi-fi stereo vcr

Technics dual cassette deck

Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2000 digital cable box

Boa's Listenin Lounge:

Klipsch RF-3 (front), RC-3, cheap little Technics (rear)

Monster MCX Biwires

Sony STR-DE935 a/v receiver

Kenwood KR-9600 AM/FM stereo receiver (vintage 1975)

Russound AB-2 receiver switch to RF-3

Teac PD-D1200 5-disk cd changer

Technics direct drive turntable

Sega Genesis game player

Sub: None yet

rock on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unlike with speaker cables and interconnects in the preamp, power amp, speaker chain I have been unable to detect any difference when I swap out cables between my CD players, my jitter reducer and my DAC, I have tried various brands of 75ohm and Toslink cables and really could not hear any difference...in the end I put the most expensive version of coax between my jitter reducer and DAC and went with the most expensive version of toslink from the CD to the jitter reducer...the build quality and RF protection seemed to be the major difference in cables, I genuinely could not hear any audible difference...with speaker cables and interconnects in the other chain I seem to have preferences...but not in this chain so far...Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunnysal,

That probably means that the digital interfaces (transmitter and receiver) in your equipment are well designed and have a high level of jitter rejection, or attenuation.

In less well engineered interfaces, where the receiver is not using some sort of phase locked loop or other type of de-jitter-fier, the restricted bandwidth of the TOSLINK cable vs the coax cable can cause a less precise determination of the "latch edge" of the signal coming into the receiver, potentially resulting in elevated levels of jitter.

Well designed interfaces will exhibit smaller, or no, differences between various types of digital cables.

Or so "they" tell me...

Ray

------------------

Music is art

Audio is engineering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...